Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Harrington
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Harrington
Organization Information
District:Lexington (01550000)School type:Elementary School
School:Harrington (01550030)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.6, Target = 97.4CPI = 92.6, Target = 97.4CPI = 92.6, Target = 97.4 95.5 94.0 92.6 -1.4 97.4 97.8 8222575On Target
High needsCPI = 81.6, Target = 92.8CPI = 81.6, Target = 92.8CPI = 81.6, Target = 92.8 87.7 83.7 81.6 -2.1 92.8 93.9 776125No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------15--
EL and Former EL -------17--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 80.6, Target = 89.4CPI = 80.6, Target = 89.4CPI = 80.6, Target = 89.4 81.8 78.4 80.6 2.2 89.4 90.9 894050Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 95.5, Target = 98.8CPI = 95.5, Target = 98.8CPI = 95.5, Target = 98.8 97.9 96.0 95.5 -0.5 98.8 99.0 6699100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------11--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.8, Target = 97.1CPI = 91.8, Target = 97.1CPI = 91.8, Target = 97.1 95.1 95.3 91.8 -3.5 97.1 97.6 71910Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.4, Target = 96.6CPI = 95.4, Target = 96.6CPI = 95.4, Target = 96.6 94.2 93.6 95.4 1.8 96.6 97.1 95225100Above Target
High needsCPI = 87.9, Target = 90.1CPI = 87.9, Target = 90.1CPI = 87.9, Target = 90.1 83.1 83.3 87.9 4.6 90.1 91.6 936075On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------15--
EL and Former EL -------17--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 84, Target = 87CPI = 84, Target = 87CPI = 84, Target = 87 77.7 73.0 84.0 11.0 87.0 88.9 943975On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 99, Target = 99CPI = 99, Target = 99 98.3 96.7 99.0 2.3 99.0 99.2 8798100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------11--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.3, Target = 96.4CPI = 94.3, Target = 96.4CPI = 94.3, Target = 96.4 93.8 94.7 94.3 -0.4 96.4 96.9 8792100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.7, Target = 94.8CPI = 91.7, Target = 94.8CPI = 91.7, Target = 94.8 91.0 92.0 91.7 -0.3 94.8 95.5 898175On Target
High needs  79.6---- 89.8-20--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------4--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 93.2, Target = 96.6CPI = 93.2, Target = 96.6CPI = 93.2, Target = 96.6 94.2 92.6 93.2 0.6 96.6 97.1 4733100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.4, Target = 95.5CPI = 92.4, Target = 95.5CPI = 92.4, Target = 95.5 92.2 95.5 92.4 -3.1 95.5 96.1 8536100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 36.1 25.32250 1.7 1.322525
High needs 9.5 8.2610 6.3 4.96125
Econ. Disadvantaged--15---15-
EL and Former EL--17---17-
Students w/ disabilities 2.7 5.04025 8.1 5.04025
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 46.5 36.4990 2.0 1.09925
Afr. Amer./Black--11---11-
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 31.6 19.8910 0.0 1.1910
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 55.7 57.82250 3.1 1.822525
High needs 23.8 25.0600 11.1 6.76025
Econ. Disadvantaged--15---15-
EL and Former EL--17---17-
Students w/ disabilities 13.5 15.43925 18.9 10.33925
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 71.4 77.6980 2.0 0.09825
Afr. Amer./Black--11---11-
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 50.5 42.4920 2.1 2.2920
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 34.6 30.9810 2.5 1.28125
High needs--20---20-
Econ. Disadvantaged--4---4-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--15---15-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 43.2 33.3330 2.7 0.03325
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 30.3 30.6360 0.0 0.03625
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 59.0 52.0 -7.0 51.0No14275On Target
High needsSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 45.0 40.0 -5.0 51.0No3725Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-10--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-11--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
AsianSGP = 63.5, Target = 51SGP = 63.5, Target = 51SGP = 63.5, Target = 51 56.0 63.5 7.5 51.0No62100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51 60.0 49.5 -10.5 51.0No5650Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51 63.5 66.0 2.5 51.0Yes141100Above Target
High needsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 54.0 58.0 4.0 51.0Yes3775On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-10--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-11--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
AsianSGP = 77, Target = 51SGP = 77, Target = 51SGP = 77, Target = 51 79.0 77.0 -2.0 51.0Yes60100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 58.0 60.0 2.0 51.0No58100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.016-
High needs- 60.016-
EL and Former EL- 60.016-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students241240100Yes239238100Yes878699Yes
High needs6868100Yes686799Yes252496Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged15---15---4---
EL and Former EL24---24---8---
Students w/ disabilities4040100Yes403998Yes16---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian108108100Yes10810799Yes383797Yes
Afr. Amer./Black11---11---3---
Hispanic/Latino12---12---5---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.12---12---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White979699Yes9696100Yes3737100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles