Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Samoset School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Samoset School

Organization Information

District:

Leominster (01530000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Samoset School (01530045)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Central

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		81.8	90.5	89.8	-0.7	89.4	90.9	47	451	75	On Target
High needs		70.9	84.0	82.3	-1.7	83.0	85.5	62	225	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		86.6	86.6	85.4	-1.2	87.7	93.3	58	166	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		56.9	82.7	83.9	1.2	74.9	78.5	79	28	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		55.6	72.7	69.7	-3.0	74.1	77.8	51	104	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		71.4	-	-	-	-	85.7	-	37	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		70.0	84.3	83.5	-0.8	82.5	85.0	57	123	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		87.5	92.8	92.5	-0.3	92.7	93.8	52	270	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		71.1	78.9	79.6	0.7	83.1	85.6	52	445	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		57.4	68.9	70.2	1.3	75.2	78.7	80	221	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		71.2	71.2	72.1	0.9	73.6	85.6	66	162	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		44.8	68.3	70.5	2.2	67.8	72.4	74	28	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		42.7	55.5	55.6	0.1	66.6	71.4	68	103	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		64.3	-	72.9	8.7	79.2	82.2	81	36	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		56.3	68.8	71.7	2.9	74.5	78.2	71	121	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		78.0	83.2	83.9	0.7	87.2	89.0	58	267	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		62.7	64.1	66.5	2.4	78.2	81.4	26	142	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		49.3	50.3	61.6	11.3	70.4	74.7	53	67	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		56.4	56.4	62.0	5.6	60.0	78.2	49	46	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		39.4	42.9	56.0	13.1	64.7	69.7	65	29	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		47.3	54.6	56.9	2.3	69.3	73.7	53	29	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		69.3	69.0	69.5	0.5	82.1	84.7	15	96	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	11.8	9.3	451	0	3.1	4.7	451	0
High needs	5.7	5.3	225	0	6.2	9.3	225	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	7.9	6.6	166	0	5.3	9.0	166	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	7.1	28	25	3.8	10.7	28	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	1.0	104	25	13.4	18.3	104	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	37	-	-	-	37	-
Hispanic/Latino	6.8	3.3	123	0	6.8	8.1	123	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	14.3	11.1	270	0	1.4	2.2	270	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	18.2	16.4	445	0	13.3	15.5	445	0
High needs	5.8	7.2	221	25	21.6	25.8	221	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	7.3	8.6	162	25	19.3	24.7	162	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	3.6	28	25	15.4	28.6	28	0
Students w/ disabilities	2.1	1.0	103	0	36.8	41.7	103	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Afr. Amer./Black	10.0	5.6	36	-	23.3	22.2	36	-
Hispanic/Latino	10.3	9.9	121	0	23.9	24.0	121	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	21.4	19.5	267	0	9.1	10.5	267	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	0.6	0.0	142	0	20.5	8.5	142	25
High needs	0.0	0.0	67	0	37.8	14.9	67	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	0.0	46	0	29.8	15.2	46	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	29	0	52.4	24.1	29	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	0.0	29	0	31.6	27.6	29	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	0.9	0.0	96	0	14.8	3.1	96	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		53.0	37.0	-16.0	51.0	No	416	25	Below Target
High needs		52.0	36.0	-16.0	51.0	No	197	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		52.5	36.0	-16.5	51.0	No	148	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		55.5	59.5	4.0	51.0	No	26	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		50.0	35.0	-15.0	51.0	No	81	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	34	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		51.0	39.0	-12.0	51.0	No	111	25	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		55.5	35.0	-20.5	51.0	No	252	25	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		38.0	34.0	-4.0	51.0	No	417	25	Below Target
High needs		38.0	31.0	-7.0	51.0	No	198	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		32.0	34.5	2.5	51.0	Yes	148	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		45.0	39.5	-5.5	51.0	Yes	26	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		40.0	27.0	-13.0	51.0	No	83	0	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	34	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		34.0	36.0	2.0	51.0	Yes	111	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	13	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		38.0	31.0	-7.0	51.0	No	251	25	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	7.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	7.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	7.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	471	465	99	Yes	471	458	97	Yes	150	147	98	Yes
High needs	239	237	99	Yes	239	232	97	Yes	74	72	97	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	175	173	99	Yes	175	168	96	Yes	51	49	96	Yes
EL and Former EL	29	29	100	Yes	29	29	100	Yes	5	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	110	110	100	Yes	110	109	99	Yes	31	31	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	41	41	100	Yes	41	40	98	Yes	12	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	130	128	98	Yes	130	125	96	Yes	31	29	97	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	13	-	-	-	13	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	279	275	99	Yes	279	272	97	Yes	100	100	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.