Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Morris

View selected organization
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Morris

Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91, Target = 92.5 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 91, Target = 92.5 75 or Higher All Students 87.1 91.8 91.0 -0.8 92.5 93.6 7416425No Change
High needsCPI = 79.5, Target = 82.9 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 79.5, Target = 82.9 75 or Higher High needs 70.7 85.6 79.5 -6.1 82.9 85.4 68500Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 84.2, Target = 90.7 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 84.2, Target = 90.7 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 89.9 89.9 84.2 -5.7 90.7 95.0 84300Declined
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.1, Target = 93.8 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 91.1, Target = 93.8 75 or Higher White 89.3 92.3 91.1 -1.2 93.8 94.7 6714925No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.8, Target = 90.8 - All StudentsAll Students-CPI = 92.8, Target = 90.8CPI = 92.8, Target = 90.875 or Higher All Students 84.3 90.5 92.8 2.3 90.8 92.2 83164100Above Target
High needsCPI = 82.5, Target = 82 - High needsHigh needs-CPI = 82.5, Target = 8275 or Higher High needs 69.1 82.4 82.5 0.1 82.0 84.6 785075On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 86.7, Target = 88 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 86.7, Target = 88 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 86.9 86.9 86.7 -0.2 88.0 93.5 893025No Change
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilities -------17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.8, Target = 92 - WhiteWhite-CPI = 93.8, Target = 92CPI = 93.8, Target = 9275 or Higher White 86.3 91.3 93.8 2.5 92.0 93.2 83149100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.7, Target = 91.6 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 87.7, Target = 91.6 75 or Higher All Students 85.6 90.5 87.7 -2.8 91.6 92.8 74570Declined
High needs -------18--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------11--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------9--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.9, Target = 92.1 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 88.9, Target = 92.1 75 or Higher White 86.5 90.1 88.9 -1.2 92.1 93.3 705425No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 24.2 16.51640 2.5 1.816425
High needs 7.4 6.0500 5.6 6.0500
Econ. Disadvantaged 7.1 6.7300 2.4 3.3300
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 24.2 16.81490 2.0 2.01490
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 41.0 50.616425 2.5 1.816425
High needs 16.7 28.05025 3.7 6.0500
Econ. Disadvantaged 16.7 30.03025 2.4 0.03025
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities--17---17-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 42.3 51.714925 2.7 2.014925
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 50.9 33.3570 1.8 3.5570
High needs--18---18-
Econ. Disadvantaged--11---11-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--9---9-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 50.9 35.2540 1.9 3.7540
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 60, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 54.0 60.0 6.0 51.0No112100Above Target
High needsSGP = 48, Target = 51 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs SGP = 48, Target = 51 75 or Higher High needs 52.0 48.0 -4.0 51.0No3150Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 57, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 5175 or Higher White 54.0 57.0 3.0 51.0No10275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 78, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 78, Target = 51SGP = 78, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 64.0 78.0 14.0 51.0Yes112100Above Target
High needsSGP = 62, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 59.0 62.0 3.0 51.0No31100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-19--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 78, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 78, Target = 51SGP = 78, Target = 5175 or Higher White 64.0 78.0 14.0 51.0Yes102100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.011.00-
High needs- 60.011.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.011.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students16916899Yes16916799Yes605998Yes
High needs555498Yes555396Yes21---
Econ. Disadvantaged333297Yes333197Yes12---
EL and Former EL14---14---5---
Students w/ disabilities18---18---9---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian6---6-------
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino11---11---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.1---1-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White15115099Yes15115099Yes565598Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles