Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Leicester High
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Leicester High
Organization Information
District:Leicester (01510000)School type:High School
School:Leicester High (01510505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:CentralTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 98.6, Target = 97.6CPI = 98.6, Target = 97.6 95.8 96.8 98.6 1.8 97.6 97.9 61109100Above Target
High needsCPI = 96, Target = 94.2CPI = 96, Target = 94.2CPI = 96, Target = 94.2 90.1 92.3 96.0 3.7 94.2 95.1 6031100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------23--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 98.5, Target = 97.5CPI = 98.5, Target = 97.5 95.7 97.3 98.5 1.2 97.5 97.9 44100100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.2, Target = 93.5CPI = 92.2, Target = 93.5CPI = 92.2, Target = 93.5 88.8 93.0 92.2 -0.8 93.5 94.4 5110925No Change
High needsCPI = 83.1, Target = 87.6CPI = 83.1, Target = 87.6CPI = 83.1, Target = 87.6 78.7 86.5 83.1 -3.4 87.6 89.4 54310Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------23--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.5, Target = 93.2CPI = 92.5, Target = 93.2 88.4 94.6 92.5 -2.1 93.2 94.2 3910075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.3, Target = 93.6CPI = 94.3, Target = 93.6 89.0 94.8 94.3 -0.5 93.6 94.5 6410175On Target
High needsCPI = 88, Target = 89.6CPI = 88, Target = 89.6CPI = 88, Target = 89.6 82.1- 88.0 -4.3 89.6 91.1 72250Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------19--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.1, Target = 93.5CPI = 94.1, Target = 93.5 88.8 95.8 94.1 -1.7 93.5 94.4 529375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 46.5 45.01090 0.0 0.91090
High needs 23.1 22.6310 0.0 3.2310
Econ. Disadvantaged--23---23-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 47.6 46.01000 0.0 1.01000
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 47.0 39.41090 2.0 1.810925
High needs 30.8 19.4310 3.8 6.5310
Econ. Disadvantaged--23---23-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 49.4 41.01000 1.2 2.01000
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 27.2 34.710125 1.1 1.01010
High needs 28.2 16.0250 0.0 4.0250
Econ. Disadvantaged--19---19-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 28.6 37.69325 0.0 1.1930
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51 47.0 45.5 -1.5 51.0Yes9875On Target
High needsSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 44.0 43.0 -1.0 51.0Yes2875On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-20--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 52.0 44.0 -8.0 51.0Yes9075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 36.0 42.0 6.0 51.0No9850Below Target
High needsSGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51 35.0 46.5 11.5 51.0No2875On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-20--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 36.5 43.0 6.5 51.0No9050Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.03-
High needs- 60.03-
EL and Former EL- 60.03-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 86.1, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 86.1, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 86.1, Target = 80 91.8 86.1 -5.7 80.0 90.011575On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 78.9, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 78.9, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 78.9, Target = 80 86.9 78.9 -8.0 80.0 90.0570Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.02--
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.019--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.02--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.01--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.07--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.03--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 84.3, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 84.3, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 84.3, Target = 80 92.5 84.3 -8.2 80.0 90.010275On Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 93.4, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.4, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.4, Target = 85 89.3 93.4 4.1 85.0 95.012275On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 88.5, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 88.5, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 88.5, Target = 85 88.9 88.5 -0.4 85.0 95.06175On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.01--
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.014--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.05--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.03--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.04--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.03--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 94.4, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.4, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.4, Target = 85 88.3 94.4 6.1 85.0 95.010775On Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 1.6, Target = 0.5 0.9 0.7 1.6 -0.9 0.5 0.5394330Declined
High needsDropout Rate = 3.8, Target = 1.5 2.6 1.1 3.8 -2.7 1.5 1.3291040Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------62--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------58--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------27--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteDropout Rate = 1.6, Target = 0.6 1.1 0.8 1.6 -0.8 0.6 0.6273810Declined
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students114114100Yes11411298Yes11411197Yes
High needs3535100Yes353397Yes353296Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged25---25---25---
EL and Former EL4---4---4---
Students w/ disabilities13---13---13---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.2---2---2---
Asian4---4---4---
Afr. Amer./Black2---2---2---
Hispanic/Latino5---5---5---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.------------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White101101100Yes101101100Yes101101100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles