Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Leicester Middle

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Leicester Middle

Organization Information

District:

Leicester (01510000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Leicester Middle (01510015)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Central

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		89.6	80.8	83.6	2.8	93.9	94.8	25	417	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		81.1	67.0	72.3	5.3	89.0	90.6	15	130	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		74.7	74.7	77.8	3.1	76.8	87.4	23	90	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		67.0	47.4	58.6	11.2	80.8	83.5	22	58	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		97.7	-	-	-	-	98.9	-	29	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		89.7	81.5	82.9	1.4	94.0	94.9	9	361	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		78.8	70.0	73.7	3.7	87.6	89.4	32	417	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		64.2	52.1	57.5	5.4	79.1	82.1	21	130	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		56.9	56.9	61.7	4.8	60.5	78.5	24	90	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		45.1	33.3	44.0	10.7	68.0	72.6	28	58	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		80.7	-	-	-	-	90.4	-	29	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		79.7	70.5	73.9	3.4	88.2	89.9	18	361	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		72.6	76.0	76.8	0.8	84.0	86.3	55	142	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		60.4	59.5	63.6	4.1	76.9	80.2	63	44	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		65.5	65.5	64.3	-1.2	68.4	82.8	57	35	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	19	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		73.9	77.4	75.8	-1.6	84.8	87.0	39	123	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	2.4	4.1	417	25	10.7	6.7	417	25
High needs	0.0	1.5	130	25	26.2	13.8	130	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	2.2	90	25	18.1	10.0	90	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	58	0	46.6	25.9	58	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	29	-	-	-	29	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	2.7	4.2	361	25	9.9	7.5	361	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	8.9	16.1	417	25	19.9	20.1	417	0
High needs	3.3	5.4	130	25	42.1	36.9	130	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	4.8	6.7	90	25	34.9	30.0	90	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	1.7	58	25	71.9	55.2	58	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	29	-	-	-	29	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	9.0	15.8	361	25	19.5	19.7	361	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.6	3.5	142	25	10.2	6.3	142	25
High needs	0.0	2.3	44	25	23.8	18.2	44	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	2.9	35	25	17.2	17.1	35	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	1.8	3.3	123	25	9.6	7.3	123	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		28.5	38.0	9.5	51.0	No	410	75	On Target
High needs		24.5	41.5	17.0	51.0	No	124	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		27.0	39.0	12.0	51.0	No	84	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		24.0	42.5	18.5	51.0	No	58	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	29	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		28.0	38.0	10.0	51.0	No	356	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		43.0	55.0	12.0	51.0	Yes	408	75	On Target
High needs		42.0	53.0	11.0	51.0	Yes	123	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		45.0	55.0	10.0	51.0	Yes	84	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		39.0	52.0	13.0	51.0	No	57	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	29	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		43.0	55.0	12.0	51.0	Yes	354	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	-	-
High needs	-	60.0	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	428	428	100	Yes	428	428	100	Yes	146	146	100	Yes
High needs	139	139	100	Yes	139	139	100	Yes	48	48	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	98	98	100	Yes	98	98	100	Yes	38	38	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	60	60	100	Yes	60	60	100	Yes	19	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	7	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	12	-	-	-	12	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	31	31	100	Yes	31	31	100	Yes	8	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
White	367	367	100	Yes	367	367	100	Yes	125	125	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.