Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Humanities & Leadership Development High School

Districts
Schools

2016

This organization is currently closed.

2016 Accountability Data - Humanities & Leadership Development High School

Organization Information

District:

Lawrence (01490000)

School type:

High School

School:

Humanities & Leadership Development High School (01490532)

Grades served:

09,10,11,12

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		90.8	96.6	98.5	1.9	94.6	95.4	58	118	100	Above Target
High needs		90.2	95.9	97.8	1.9	94.3	95.1	80	81	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		96.0	96.0	97.5	1.5	96.3	98.0	71	70	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		90.3	96.6	98.4	1.8	94.3	95.2	89	111	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		75.7	79.1	83.0	3.9	85.8	87.9	18	119	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		74.7	75.6	77.4	1.8	85.2	87.4	29	82	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		78.2	78.2	80.6	2.4	80.0	89.1	30	72	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		75.3	78.8	82.6	3.8	85.6	87.7	67	112	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		67.3	66.7	71.1	4.4	80.9	83.7	9	116	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		67.0	63.0	65.5	2.5	80.8	83.5	7	79	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		64.2	64.2	66.7	2.5	67.2	82.1	8	69	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		66.6	66.8	71.1	4.3	80.5	83.3	34	110	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	29.7	35.6	118	25	0.8	0.8	118	0
High needs	22.8	23.5	81	0	1.1	1.2	81	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	25.9	27.1	70	0	1.2	1.4	70	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Hispanic/Latino	30.2	34.2	111	25	0.9	0.9	111	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	19.1	37.8	119	25	14.8	11.8	119	25
High needs	13.5	30.5	82	25	16.9	17.1	82	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	15.2	33.3	72	25	13.9	13.9	72	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Hispanic/Latino	19.5	38.4	112	25	15.0	12.5	112	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.0	4.3	116	25	13.1	12.9	116	0
High needs	0.0	3.8	79	25	17.3	15.2	79	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	4.3	69	25	13.8	14.5	69	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Hispanic/Latino	1.0	2.7	110	25	13.4	12.7	110	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		75.5	73.5	-2.0	51.0	Yes	102	100	Above Target
High needs		75.0	71.0	-4.0	51.0	Yes	67	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		74.0	70.0	-4.0	51.0	Yes	59	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		76.0	73.0	-3.0	51.0	Yes	97	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		48.5	46.0	-2.5	51.0	Yes	105	75	On Target
High needs		51.0	55.0	4.0	51.0	No	69	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		54.0	56.0	2.0	51.0	No	61	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		48.5	45.5	-3.0	51.0	Yes	100	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	65.0	60.0	37.00	25
High needs	65.0	60.0	37.00	25
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	37.00	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		88.2	81.8	-6.4	80.0	90.0	137	75	On Target
High needs		88.1	80.9	-7.2	80.0	90.0	131	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	30	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	28	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		87.0	82.0	-5.0	80.0	90.0	122	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	8	-	-

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		80.7	88.2	7.5	85.0	95.0	136	75	On Target
High needs		80.9	88.1	7.2	85.0	95.0	135	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	25	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	29	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	6	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		80.3	87.0	6.7	85.0	95.0	123	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	4	-	-

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		5.3	0.6	2.1	-1.5	3.1	2.7	31	578	75	On Target
High needs		5.3	0.6	2.2	-1.6	3.1	2.7	46	408	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		0.6	-	-	-	-	0.3	-	335	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	70	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	112	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		5.6	0.6	2.0	-1.4	3.3	2.8	51	542	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-

Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more) About the Data
	2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged	PPI Points
All students	-	-
High needs	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	131	125	95	Yes	131	126	96	Yes	131	129	98	Yes
High needs	93	87	96	Yes	93	88	95	Yes	93	91	98	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	79	74	96	Yes	79	76	96	Yes	79	78	99	Yes
EL and Former EL	20	-	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	19	-	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	124	118	95	Yes	124	119	96	Yes	124	122	98	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.