Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Business Management & Finance High School

Districts
Schools

2016

This organization is currently closed.

2016 Accountability Data - Business Management & Finance High School

Organization Information

District:

Lawrence (01490000)

School type:

High School

School:

Business Management & Finance High School (01490530)

Grades served:

09,10,11,12

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 4

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		72.7	88.9	89.3	0.4	84.1	86.4	5	124	100	Above Target
High needs		71.7	86.8	87.3	0.5	83.5	85.9	9	100	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		85.8	85.8	89.6	3.8	87.0	92.9	10	84	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		76.3	76.7	78.8	2.1	82.2	88.2	39	39	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		71.8	87.7	88.8	1.1	83.6	85.9	28	112	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		50.0	74.7	71.8	-2.9	70.8	75.0	6	124	75	On Target
High needs		49.7	72.3	68.3	-4.0	70.7	74.9	7	100	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		72.0	72.0	70.5	-1.5	74.3	86.0	7	84	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		57.1	57.8	55.8	-2.0	67.8	78.6	34	39	25	No Change
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		48.2	73.4	69.6	-3.8	69.8	74.1	22	112	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		49.1	59.8	67.9	8.1	70.3	74.6	5	95	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		48.1	58.5	64.4	5.9	69.7	74.1	6	73	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		56.7	56.7	66.0	9.3	60.3	78.4	7	61	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	22	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		47.7	56.5	66.0	9.5	69.5	73.9	21	83	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	13.3	12.1	124	0	4.4	3.2	124	25
High needs	13.5	9.0	100	0	5.4	4.0	100	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	14.9	10.7	84	0	6.0	1.2	84	25
EL and Former EL	3.3	2.6	39	0	10.0	10.3	39	0
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	13.0	11.6	112	0	5.2	3.6	112	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	22.2	14.5	124	0	16.7	15.3	124	0
High needs	20.3	12.0	100	0	17.6	17.0	100	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	20.9	14.3	84	0	17.9	15.5	84	25
EL and Former EL	10.3	5.1	39	0	31.0	33.3	39	0
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	19.5	13.4	112	0	18.2	17.0	112	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	0.0	5.3	95	25	12.5	11.6	95	0
High needs	0.0	1.4	73	25	12.8	13.7	73	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.0	1.6	61	25	14.6	13.1	61	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	22	-	-	-	22	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.0	4.8	83	25	14.0	13.3	83	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		48.0	41.5	-6.5	51.0	No	88	50	Below Target
High needs		50.5	42.0	-8.5	51.0	No	67	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		48.0	40.0	-8.0	51.0	Yes	57	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	23	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		46.5	41.5	-5.0	51.0	Yes	80	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		50.0	34.0	-16.0	51.0	No	87	25	Below Target
High needs		48.0	35.0	-13.0	51.0	No	67	25	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		43.0	35.0	-8.0	51.0	No	57	25	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	23	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		48.0	31.0	-17.0	51.0	No	79	25	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	82.5	60.0	92.00	25
High needs	82.5	60.0	92.00	25
EL and Former EL	82.5	60.0	92.00	25

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		77.7	86.0	8.3	80.0	90.0	121	75	On Target
High needs		77.2	85.5	8.3	80.0	90.0	117	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	37	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	18	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		76.7	86.0	9.3	80.0	90.0	100	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	17	-	-

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		72.7	79.7	7.0	85.0	95.0	148	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		73.1	79.3	6.2	85.0	95.0	145	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	24	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	24	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		74.5	78.3	3.8	85.0	95.0	120	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	20	-	-

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		9.8	2.5	2.2	0.3	5.7	4.9	29	490	100	Above Target
High needs		9.6	1.7	2.7	-1.0	5.6	4.8	39	370	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		1.4	-	-	-	-	0.7	-	289	-	-
EL and Former EL		4.2	3.1	2.3	0.8	2.5	2.1	64	87	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	94	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		10.4	2.5	1.9	0.6	6.1	5.2	53	426	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	51	-	-

Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more) About the Data
	2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged	PPI Points
All students	1	0
High needs	1	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	133	133	100	Yes	133	133	100	Yes	134	134	100	Yes
High needs	109	109	100	Yes	108	108	100	Yes	109	109	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	92	92	100	Yes	91	91	100	Yes	92	92	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	43	43	100	Yes	42	42	100	Yes	43	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	19	-	-	-	19	-	-	-	19	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	121	121	100	Yes	121	121	100	Yes	122	122	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.