Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Frost Middle School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Frost Middle School

Organization Information

District:

Lawrence (01490000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Frost Middle School (01490525)

Grades served:

05,06,07,08

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		84.6	82.7	84.8	2.1	91.0	92.3	27	464	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		82.6	77.8	81.0	3.2	89.9	91.3	52	306	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		80.9	80.9	83.8	2.9	82.5	90.5	51	265	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		64.0	62.9	73.4	10.5	79.0	82.0	50	63	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		68.6	58.7	57.8	-0.9	81.7	84.3	20	77	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		83.4	80.9	83.6	2.7	90.3	91.7	59	384	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		90.1	85.8	87.7	1.9	94.2	95.1	25	51	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		74.0	75.3	72.7	-2.6	84.8	87.0	29	462	0	Declined
High needs		71.5	69.9	66.4	-3.5	83.4	85.8	64	305	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		72.1	72.1	69.3	-2.8	74.4	86.1	55	264	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		58.5	59.3	59.1	-0.2	75.8	79.3	51	63	25	No Change
Students w/ disabilities		60.1	53.3	43.8	-9.5	76.7	80.1	27	77	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		72.2	72.8	70.4	-2.4	83.8	86.1	65	382	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		81.3	82.2	78.9	-3.3	89.1	90.7	38	51	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		58.8	69.3	57.2	-12.1	76.0	79.4	14	223	0	Declined
High needs		57.2	63.0	51.8	-11.2	75.0	78.6	15	149	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		65.2	65.2	53.0	-12.2	68.1	82.6	20	133	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		44.8	47.9	41.9	-6.0	67.8	72.4	50	34	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		52.7	56.6	38.3	-18.3	72.4	76.4	13	32	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		55.4	66.7	56.0	-10.7	74.0	77.7	50	189	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		70.9	81.0	57.1	-23.9	83.0	85.5	3	21	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	10.0	8.2	464	0	11.5	6.3	464	25
High needs	7.5	6.5	306	0	15.7	8.5	306	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	8.3	7.5	265	0	12.1	6.4	265	25
EL and Former EL	4.8	1.6	63	0	30.6	12.7	63	25
Students w/ disabilities	1.2	0.0	77	0	34.9	27.3	77	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Hispanic/Latino	9.5	6.8	384	0	12.2	6.8	384	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	8.6	5.9	51	0	13.8	3.9	51	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	26.0	19.3	462	0	15.8	20.8	462	0
High needs	19.3	12.8	305	0	20.3	27.2	305	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	21.2	13.3	264	0	17.8	23.1	264	0
EL and Former EL	8.1	4.8	63	0	29.0	36.5	63	0
Students w/ disabilities	2.4	3.9	77	25	33.3	54.5	77	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Hispanic/Latino	22.2	16.0	382	0	17.6	23.0	382	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	37.3	33.3	51	0	11.9	13.7	51	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	5.0	1.8	223	0	17.2	31.4	223	0
High needs	3.5	0.0	149	0	23.6	36.9	149	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	4.1	0.0	133	0	20.3	33.8	133	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	34	0	36.1	52.9	34	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	32	0	36.8	68.8	32	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Hispanic/Latino	4.4	0.5	189	0	20.6	31.2	189	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	8.0	9.5	21	25	4.0	42.9	21	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		52.0	55.5	3.5	51.0	No	442	75	On Target
High needs		50.5	61.0	10.5	51.0	No	285	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		50.5	61.0	10.5	51.0	No	246	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		53.5	69.0	15.5	51.0	Yes	54	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		51.5	54.0	2.5	51.0	No	69	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		52.5	58.5	6.0	51.0	No	364	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		44.5	48.0	3.5	51.0	No	49	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		58.0	47.0	-11.0	51.0	No	443	50	Below Target
High needs		58.0	45.0	-13.0	51.0	No	287	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		57.0	46.0	-11.0	51.0	No	248	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		44.0	51.0	7.0	51.0	No	54	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		55.5	35.0	-20.5	51.0	No	72	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		56.0	46.0	-10.0	51.0	No	364	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		65.0	44.5	-20.5	51.0	No	50	50	Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	83.0	60.0	33.00	25
High needs	83.0	60.0	33.00	25
EL and Former EL	83.0	60.0	33.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	497	496	100	Yes	499	497	100	Yes	247	246	100	Yes
High needs	337	336	100	Yes	339	338	100	Yes	171	171	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	290	289	100	Yes	292	291	100	Yes	151	151	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	86	86	100	Yes	87	87	100	Yes	50	50	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	85	85	100	Yes	85	85	100	Yes	37	37	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	18	-	-	-	18	-	-	-	7	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	9	-	-	-	9	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	414	414	100	Yes	415	413	100	Yes	209	209	100	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	53	52	98	Yes	54	54	100	Yes	24	23	96	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.