Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Spark Academy

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Spark Academy

Organization Information

District:

Lawrence (01490000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Spark Academy (01490085)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		72.6	70.4	81.8	11.4	84.0	86.3	19	391	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		72.3	67.9	80.1	12.2	83.8	86.2	47	334	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		69.0	69.0	80.9	11.9	71.6	84.5	37	292	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		63.0	56.7	72.6	15.9	78.4	81.5	48	126	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		59.7	57.4	64.7	7.3	76.5	79.9	36	104	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		71.5	69.9	81.2	11.3	83.4	85.8	48	357	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		59.6	72.0	77.6	5.6	76.4	79.8	45	387	75	On Target
High needs		59.5	69.6	75.3	5.7	76.4	79.8	91	330	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		71.1	71.1	76.0	4.9	73.5	85.6	80	288	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		53.9	59.3	71.4	12.1	73.1	77.0	76	126	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		52.3	59.3	56.9	-2.4	72.2	76.2	72	105	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		58.1	70.9	76.7	5.8	75.6	79.1	83	354	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		51.2	72.0	65.1	-6.9	71.5	75.6	23	116	0	Declined
High needs		51.2	70.7	60.1	-10.6	71.5	75.6	46	92	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		71.5	71.5	59.7	-11.8	73.9	85.8	39	80	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		46.8	59.6	45.6	-14.0	69.0	73.4	65	34	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		52.1	63.8	50.9	-12.9	72.1	76.1	46	28	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		50.8	70.2	64.5	-5.7	71.3	75.4	78	107	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	4.8	8.4	391	25	21.4	10.0	391	25
High needs	4.6	7.8	334	25	24.6	11.1	334	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.1	8.2	292	25	22.8	10.3	292	25
EL and Former EL	2.8	3.2	126	25	40.8	16.7	126	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	1.0	104	25	33.9	20.2	104	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Hispanic/Latino	4.5	8.1	357	25	22.0	10.6	357	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	15.2	20.7	387	25	21.3	16.8	387	25
High needs	13.6	18.5	330	25	23.9	19.1	330	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	14.6	18.4	288	25	22.4	18.8	288	25
EL and Former EL	5.6	9.5	126	25	36.4	23.8	126	25
Students w/ disabilities	3.5	4.8	105	25	33.0	41.9	105	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Hispanic/Latino	14.0	18.6	354	25	21.9	17.5	354	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	3.6	2.6	116	0	17.1	23.3	116	0
High needs	2.4	2.2	92	0	17.3	29.3	92	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.7	2.5	80	0	16.8	30.0	80	0
EL and Former EL	1.7	0.0	34	0	28.3	52.9	34	0
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	28	0	23.4	42.9	28	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Hispanic/Latino	3.1	2.8	107	0	18.6	25.2	107	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		28.0	56.0	28.0	51.0	Yes	349	100	Above Target
High needs		29.5	56.0	26.5	51.0	Yes	293	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		31.5	56.0	24.5	51.0	Yes	261	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		30.0	67.0	37.0	51.0	Yes	102	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		20.0	53.5	33.5	51.0	No	80	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		29.0	56.0	27.0	51.0	Yes	319	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	16	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		48.0	67.0	19.0	51.0	Yes	351	100	Above Target
High needs		48.0	68.0	20.0	51.0	Yes	295	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		48.5	67.0	18.5	51.0	Yes	262	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		35.0	79.5	44.5	51.0	Yes	106	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		35.0	61.0	26.0	51.0	No	82	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		48.0	66.0	18.0	51.0	Yes	322	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	83.0	60.0	59.00	25
High needs	83.0	60.0	59.00	25
EL and Former EL	83.0	60.0	59.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	439	437	100	Yes	439	433	99	Yes	134	130	97	Yes
High needs	379	377	99	Yes	379	373	98	Yes	107	103	96	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	326	324	99	Yes	326	320	98	Yes	92	88	96	Yes
EL and Former EL	158	158	100	Yes	158	158	100	Yes	41	41	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	116	115	99	Yes	116	116	100	Yes	30	29	97	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	12	-	-	-	12	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	404	402	100	Yes	404	399	99	Yes	123	120	98	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	19	-	-	-	19	-	-	-	5	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.