Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Henry K. Oliver Middle School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - UP Academy Oliver Middle School

Organization Information

District:

Lawrence (01490000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

UP Academy Oliver Middle School (01490049)

Grades served:

06,07,08

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 4

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		74.2	71.1	71.4	0.3	85.0	87.1	7	295	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		73.7	69.0	67.8	-1.2	84.7	86.9	8	249	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		71.3	71.3	71.5	0.2	73.7	85.7	10	212	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		47.3	50.8	51.8	1.0	69.3	73.7	5	99	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		52.9	40.7	54.3	13.6	72.5	76.5	13	58	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		73.7	71.4	71.4	0.0	84.7	86.9	17	281	25	No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		50.6	69.1	66.2	-2.9	71.2	75.3	15	295	0	Declined
High needs		50.1	67.5	61.9	-5.6	70.9	75.1	44	250	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		70.6	70.6	65.4	-5.2	73.1	85.3	40	213	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		27.8	52.1	48.0	-4.1	57.9	63.9	24	99	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		31.0	35.1	36.0	0.9	59.8	65.5	9	59	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		50.1	69.7	66.4	-3.3	70.9	75.1	53	281	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		48.1	62.4	53.7	-8.7	69.7	74.1	10	115	0	Declined
High needs		47.0	59.8	50.0	-9.8	69.1	73.5	13	94	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		60.1	60.1	54.9	-5.2	63.4	80.1	24	76	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		40.0	44.4	38.8	-5.6	50.0	70.0	40	38	0	Declined
Students w/ disabilities		27.2	-	-	-	-	63.6	-	23	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		48.0	62.9	55.1	-7.8	69.7	74.0	43	107	0	Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	5.0	4.7	295	0	24.1	21.7	295	25
High needs	4.8	3.6	249	0	26.4	24.5	249	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.1	4.2	212	0	23.9	19.8	212	25
EL and Former EL	1.0	0.0	99	0	43.9	41.4	99	0
Students w/ disabilities	1.9	0.0	58	0	59.3	36.2	58	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Hispanic/Latino	5.2	5.0	281	0	23.5	21.4	281	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	20.6	20.0	295	0	28.9	31.5	295	0
High needs	19.9	18.0	250	0	30.8	36.8	250	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	22.0	20.7	213	0	26.7	32.9	213	0
EL and Former EL	7.4	7.1	99	0	47.4	51.5	99	0
Students w/ disabilities	1.9	3.4	59	25	73.1	67.8	59	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Hispanic/Latino	21.3	20.3	281	0	28.2	31.7	281	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.0	2.6	115	25	28.9	36.5	115	0
High needs	1.1	2.1	94	25	31.0	41.5	94	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	1.3	2.6	76	25	31.2	35.5	76	0
EL and Former EL	0.0	0.0	38	0	51.9	50.0	38	0
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	1.1	2.8	107	25	28.0	34.6	107	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		66.0	51.0	-15.0	51.0	No	272	75	On Target
High needs		65.0	49.0	-16.0	51.0	No	227	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		65.0	49.0	-16.0	51.0	No	192	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		59.5	54.5	-5.0	51.0	No	80	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		40.0	64.0	24.0	51.0	Yes	54	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		66.0	51.0	-15.0	51.0	No	258	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		85.0	69.0	-16.0	51.0	No	272	100	Above Target
High needs		85.0	68.5	-16.5	51.0	No	228	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		86.0	69.0	-17.0	51.0	No	193	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		75.0	67.5	-7.5	51.0	No	80	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		51.0	50.0	-1.0	51.0	No	56	50	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		86.0	69.0	-17.0	51.0	No	258	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	6	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	74.5	60.0	78.00	25
High needs	74.5	60.0	78.00	25
EL and Former EL	74.5	60.0	78.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	336	322	96	Yes	335	320	96	Yes	122	120	98	Yes
High needs	290	276	95	Yes	289	275	95	Yes	101	99	98	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	244	231	95	Yes	244	232	95	Yes	80	78	98	Yes
EL and Former EL	126	123	98	Yes	125	121	97	Yes	44	42	95	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	63	59	97	Yes	63	60	95	Yes	24	23	96	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	7	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	319	306	96	Yes	318	304	96	Yes	113	111	98	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-	4	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.