Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Robert Frost

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Robert Frost

Organization Information
District:Lawrence (01490000)School type:Elementary School
School:Robert Frost (01490018)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 3
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 74, Target = 86.2CPI = 74, Target = 86.2CPI = 74, Target = 86.2 76.4 65.9 74.0 8.1 86.2 88.2 1424250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 67.6, Target = 85.7CPI = 67.6, Target = 85.7CPI = 67.6, Target = 85.7 75.4 63.4 67.6 4.2 85.7 87.7 1717350Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 69.2, Target = 66.7CPI = 69.2, Target = 66.7CPI = 69.2, Target = 66.7 63.7 63.7 69.2 5.5 66.7 81.9 21146100Above Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 62, Target = 85.8CPI = 62, Target = 85.8CPI = 62, Target = 85.8 75.7 58.1 62.0 3.9 85.8 87.9 227350Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 41, Target = 73.4CPI = 41, Target = 73.4CPI = 41, Target = 73.4 54.4- 41.0 1.8 73.4 77.2 43650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------14--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 70.7, Target = 84.6CPI = 70.7, Target = 84.6CPI = 70.7, Target = 84.6 73.6 62.3 70.7 8.4 84.6 86.8 4218650Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White  82.0---- 91.0-30--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 79.3, Target = 86.7CPI = 79.3, Target = 86.7CPI = 79.3, Target = 86.7 77.2 81.3 79.3 -2.0 86.7 88.6 2524125No Change
High needsCPI = 75.6, Target = 85.8CPI = 75.6, Target = 85.8CPI = 75.6, Target = 85.8 75.7 79.2 75.6 -3.6 85.8 87.9 481720Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 77.2, Target = 80.4CPI = 77.2, Target = 80.4CPI = 77.2, Target = 80.4 78.6 78.6 77.2 -1.4 80.4 89.3 5214525No Change
EL and Former ELCPI = 74.7, Target = 86.5CPI = 74.7, Target = 86.5CPI = 74.7, Target = 86.5 76.9 79.2 74.7 -4.5 86.5 88.5 53730Declined
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 64.6, Target = 70CPI = 64.6, Target = 70CPI = 64.6, Target = 70 48.5- 64.6 7.8 70.0 74.3 513650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------14--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 76.5, Target = 85.4CPI = 76.5, Target = 85.4CPI = 76.5, Target = 85.4 75.0 79.3 76.5 -2.8 85.4 87.5 631850Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White  83.6---- 91.8-30--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 2.3 5.824225 22.8 13.624225
High needs 3.0 3.517325 25.3 18.517325
Econ. Disadvantaged 2.9 3.414625 24.1 16.414625
EL and Former EL 1.5 2.77325 32.3 24.77325
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0360 59.5 58.3360
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--14---14-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino 1.1 4.318625 25.9 16.718625
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--30---30-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 24.2 19.92410 7.3 11.62410
High needs 22.3 14.01720 7.8 14.51720
Econ. Disadvantaged 21.9 15.21450 7.3 12.41450
EL and Former EL 21.5 13.7730 7.7 16.4730
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 11.13625 35.1 33.3360
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--14---14-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino 18.9 16.21850 8.6 14.11850
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--30---30-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51 25.5 44.5 19.0 51.0Yes102100Above Target
High needsSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 26.0 41.0 15.0 51.0No70100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 25.0 42.0 17.0 51.0No55100Above Target
EL and Former ELSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 30.0 48.0 18.0 51.0Yes33100Above Target
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-7--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51 24.5 42.5 18.0 51.0Yes78100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-13--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 18.5, Target = 51SGP = 18.5, Target = 51SGP = 18.5, Target = 51 21.5 18.5 -3.0 51.0No1040Below Target
High needsSGP = 19, Target = 51SGP = 19, Target = 51SGP = 19, Target = 51 20.0 19.0 -1.0 51.0No720Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 19, Target = 51SGP = 19, Target = 51SGP = 19, Target = 51 14.0 19.0 5.0 51.0No5750Below Target
EL and Former ELSGP = 26.5, Target = 51SGP = 26.5, Target = 51SGP = 26.5, Target = 51 46.0 26.5 -19.5 51.0Yes3475On Target
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-7--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 16.5, Target = 51SGP = 16.5, Target = 51SGP = 16.5, Target = 51 21.0 16.5 -4.5 51.0No800Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-13--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 72.0 60.09325
High needs 72.0 60.09325
EL and Former EL 72.0 60.09325
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students263263100Yes260260100Yes----
High needs193193100Yes190190100Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged164164100Yes162162100Yes----
EL and Former EL8787100Yes8585100Yes----
Students w/ disabilities3737100Yes3737100Yes----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian14---14-------
Afr. Amer./Black6---6-------
Hispanic/Latino205205100Yes202202100Yes----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.6---6-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White3232100Yes3232100Yes----

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles