Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Arlington Middle School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Arlington Middle School

Organization Information

District:

Lawrence (01490000)

School type:

Middle School

School:

Arlington Middle School (01490017)

Grades served:

05,06,07,08

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 3

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		65.4	64.1	69.2	5.1	79.8	82.7	5	494	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		65.4	62.9	66.6	3.7	79.8	82.7	7	434	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		65.5	65.5	69.5	4.0	68.4	82.8	8	370	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		46.1	43.8	52.8	9.0	68.6	73.1	7	202	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		46.6	44.4	48.2	3.8	68.9	73.3	6	69	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		65.4	63.9	69.0	5.1	79.8	82.7	12	480	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		44.9	56.2	60.0	3.8	67.9	72.5	8	490	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		44.8	54.7	58.1	3.4	67.8	72.4	23	430	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		57.1	57.1	60.3	3.2	60.7	78.6	20	368	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		32.1	41.5	49.6	8.1	60.4	66.1	30	200	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		30.1	35.7	36.2	0.5	59.2	65.1	10	69	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		45.0	56.2	60.1	3.9	67.9	72.5	30	476	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		40.5	39.6	43.5	3.9	65.3	70.3	6	230	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		40.4	39.1	42.0	2.9	65.2	70.2	6	205	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		41.1	41.1	43.0	1.9	46.0	70.6	9	176	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		29.5	28.3	36.3	8.0	58.9	64.8	33	95	50	Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities		33.3	31.8	33.6	1.8	61.1	66.7	7	32	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		39.6	39.0	43.6	4.6	64.8	69.8	20	225	50	Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	1.7	2.6	494	25	30.2	23.1	494	25
High needs	1.8	2.1	434	25	32.1	25.6	434	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	1.8	2.4	370	25	27.5	22.4	370	25
EL and Former EL	0.0	1.5	202	25	57.8	40.6	202	25
Students w/ disabilities	1.6	0.0	69	0	58.1	40.6	69	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Hispanic/Latino	1.5	2.7	480	25	30.6	23.5	480	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	5.8	9.0	490	25	38.9	34.5	490	25
High needs	5.6	8.1	430	25	41.3	36.5	430	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	6.0	8.7	368	25	38.1	33.7	368	25
EL and Former EL	2.3	4.0	200	25	60.3	47.5	200	25
Students w/ disabilities	4.9	2.9	69	0	70.5	66.7	69	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Hispanic/Latino	4.9	9.0	476	25	38.6	34.5	476	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	0.9	0.9	230	0	56.3	49.1	230	25
High needs	0.9	0.5	205	0	57.2	51.7	205	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	0.5	0.6	176	25	54.7	49.4	176	0
EL and Former EL	1.1	0.0	95	0	76.1	63.2	95	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	32	0	72.7	68.8	32	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Hispanic/Latino	0.9	0.9	225	0	57.1	48.9	225	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		37.0	49.0	12.0	51.0	Yes	440	75	On Target
High needs		37.0	49.0	12.0	51.0	No	380	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		37.5	48.0	10.5	51.0	Yes	337	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		43.0	55.0	12.0	51.0	No	156	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		36.0	49.0	13.0	51.0	No	63	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		37.0	49.0	12.0	51.0	Yes	427	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		47.0	46.0	-1.0	51.0	No	439	50	Below Target
High needs		47.5	46.0	-1.5	51.0	No	379	50	Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		45.5	41.0	-4.5	51.0	No	335	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		50.0	53.5	3.5	51.0	Yes	158	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		41.0	38.0	-3.0	51.0	No	64	25	Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		48.0	46.0	-2.0	51.0	No	427	50	Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	82.0	60.0	151.00	25
High needs	82.0	60.0	151.00	25
EL and Former EL	82.0	60.0	151.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	567	566	100	Yes	567	563	99	Yes	275	273	99	Yes
High needs	505	504	100	Yes	505	501	99	Yes	249	247	99	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	420	419	100	Yes	422	418	99	Yes	210	208	99	Yes
EL and Former EL	265	265	100	Yes	264	263	100	Yes	133	133	100	Yes
Students w/ disabilities	73	73	100	Yes	73	73	100	Yes	35	35	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	7	-	-	-	7	-	-	-	2	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	549	548	100	Yes	549	546	99	Yes	267	265	99	Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	11	-	-	-	11	-	-	-	6	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.