Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Winthrop
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Winthrop
Organization Information
District:Ipswich (01440000)School type:Elementary School
School:Winthrop (01440015)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.2, Target = 91.4CPI = 88.2, Target = 91.4CPI = 88.2, Target = 91.4 85.3 87.9 88.2 0.3 91.4 92.7 6220750Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 78.1, Target = 80.9CPI = 78.1, Target = 80.9CPI = 78.1, Target = 80.9 67.2 73.4 78.1 4.7 80.9 83.6 626550Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 82.6, Target = 78.8CPI = 82.6, Target = 78.8CPI = 82.6, Target = 78.8 76.9 76.9 82.6 5.7 78.8 88.5 7833100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 73, Target = 76.3CPI = 73, Target = 76.3CPI = 73, Target = 76.3 59.4 61.4 73.0 11.6 76.3 79.7 723750Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.4, Target = 92.1CPI = 88.4, Target = 92.1CPI = 88.4, Target = 92.1 86.4 88.3 88.4 0.1 92.1 93.2 5118150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.7, Target = 90.4CPI = 91.7, Target = 90.4CPI = 91.7, Target = 90.4 83.5 87.6 91.7 4.1 90.4 91.8 78206100Above Target
High needsCPI = 82.4, Target = 80.6CPI = 82.4, Target = 80.6CPI = 82.4, Target = 80.6 66.8 75.4 82.4 7.0 80.6 83.4 7764100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 84.4, Target = 78.2CPI = 84.4, Target = 78.2CPI = 84.4, Target = 78.2 76.2 76.2 84.4 8.2 78.2 88.1 8232100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 77.7, Target = 75.2CPI = 77.7, Target = 75.2CPI = 77.7, Target = 75.2 57.5 66.9 77.7 10.8 75.2 78.8 8337100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------12--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93, Target = 90.8CPI = 93, Target = 90.8CPI = 93, Target = 90.8 84.3 88.7 93.0 4.3 90.8 92.2 80181100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.1, Target = 90.6CPI = 90.1, Target = 90.6 83.8 86.5 90.1 3.6 90.6 91.9 846875On Target
High needs -------18--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------10--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.4, Target = 90.8CPI = 92.4, Target = 90.8CPI = 92.4, Target = 90.8 84.3 88.0 92.4 4.4 90.8 92.2 8556100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 19.7 14.52070 5.7 3.420725
High needs 3.2 9.26525 17.5 10.86525
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.0 15.23325 12.5 6.13325
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 2.73725 30.3 13.53725
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.0 14.91810 5.6 3.318125
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 35.7 37.42060 4.8 2.420625
High needs 12.5 20.36425 10.9 7.86425
Econ. Disadvantaged 17.1 25.03225 14.6 6.33225
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 2.9 13.53725 11.8 10.8370
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--12---12-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 38.5 39.21810 3.1 1.118125
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 21.2 33.86825 3.5 4.4680
High needs--18---18-
Econ. Disadvantaged--10---10-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 22.5 33.95625 2.8 1.85625
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51 47.0 47.5 0.5 51.0No13650Below Target
High needsSGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51SGP = 47.5, Target = 51 50.0 47.5 -2.5 51.0No3850Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-22--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 45.0 47.0 2.0 51.0No11750Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51 47.0 69.0 22.0 51.0Yes137100Above Target
High needsSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 55.5 64.0 8.5 51.0Yes39100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-23--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 71, Target = 51SGP = 71, Target = 51SGP = 71, Target = 51 46.0 71.0 25.0 51.0Yes117100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.09-
High needs- 60.09-
EL and Former EL- 60.09-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students208208100Yes207207100Yes696899Yes
High needs6666100Yes6565100Yes19---
Econ. Disadvantaged3434100Yes3333100Yes10---
EL and Former EL4---3---1---
Students w/ disabilities3838100Yes3838100Yes11---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian4---3---1---
Afr. Amer./Black2---2-------
Hispanic/Latino8---8---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.12---12---7---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White182182100Yes182182100Yes575698Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles