Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Halifax Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Halifax Elementary
Organization Information
District:Halifax (01180000)School type:Elementary School
School:Halifax Elementary (01180005)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.6, Target = 94.5CPI = 88.6, Target = 94.5CPI = 88.6, Target = 94.5 90.6 88.8 88.6 -0.2 94.5 95.3 6531425No Change
High needsCPI = 78.2, Target = 86.2CPI = 78.2, Target = 86.2CPI = 78.2, Target = 86.2 76.4 77.1 78.2 1.1 86.2 88.2 6211050Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 84.3, Target = 82CPI = 84.3, Target = 82CPI = 84.3, Target = 82 80.4 80.4 84.3 3.9 82.0 90.2 8570100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 69, Target = 80.6CPI = 69, Target = 80.6CPI = 69, Target = 80.6 66.7 67.9 69.0 1.1 80.6 83.4 635850Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 88.5, Target = 94.6CPI = 88.5, Target = 94.6CPI = 88.5, Target = 94.6 90.8 88.7 88.5 -0.2 94.6 95.4 5130325No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.6, Target = 92.9CPI = 90.6, Target = 92.9CPI = 90.6, Target = 92.9 87.9 88.7 90.6 1.9 92.9 94.0 7431550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 79.1, Target = 83.8CPI = 79.1, Target = 83.8CPI = 79.1, Target = 83.8 72.2 77.6 79.1 1.5 83.8 86.1 6411050Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 85, Target = 83.7CPI = 85, Target = 83.7CPI = 85, Target = 83.7 82.2 82.2 85.0 2.8 83.7 91.1 8570100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 67.7, Target = 78CPI = 67.7, Target = 78CPI = 67.7, Target = 78 62.3 65.1 67.7 2.6 78.0 81.2 605850Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 90.8, Target = 93.1CPI = 90.8, Target = 93.1CPI = 90.8, Target = 93.1 88.1 88.3 90.8 2.5 93.1 94.1 6730450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 81.2, Target = 90.1CPI = 81.2, Target = 90.1CPI = 81.2, Target = 90.1 83.1 88.0 81.2 -6.8 90.1 91.6 50890Declined
High needsCPI = 70, Target = 82CPI = 70, Target = 82CPI = 70, Target = 82 69.1- 70.0 -9.4 82.0 84.6 58350Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------21--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 81, Target = 90.6CPI = 81, Target = 90.6CPI = 81, Target = 90.6 83.8 88.0 81.0 -7.0 90.6 91.9 31880Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 15.6 13.73140 3.4 3.53140
High needs 4.8 4.51100 9.5 9.11100
Econ. Disadvantaged 7.2 5.7700 5.8 5.7700
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0580 17.0 15.5580
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 15.7 13.93030 3.5 3.63030
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 32.5 32.73150 4.3 3.531525
High needs 15.2 10.91100 10.5 10.01100
Econ. Disadvantaged 15.9 12.9700 7.2 4.37025
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 11.3 5.2580 20.8 19.0580
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 32.3 32.63040 4.5 3.330425
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 18.3 7.9890 4.2 6.7890
High needs 14.7 2.9350 2.9 17.1350
Econ. Disadvantaged--21---21-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--18---18-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 18.8 8.0880 4.3 6.8880
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 50.0 50.0 0.0 51.0No21150Below Target
High needsSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 53.0 40.0 -13.0 51.0No6725Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 51.0 50.0 -1.0 51.0Yes4575On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 55.0 34.0 -21.0 51.0No3025Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 50.0 50.0 0.0 51.0No20250Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 54.0 65.0 11.0 51.0Yes212100Above Target
High needsSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 56.0 65.0 9.0 51.0No67100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51 50.0 66.0 16.0 51.0No45100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 65.5, Target = 51SGP = 65.5, Target = 51SGP = 65.5, Target = 51 62.0 65.5 3.5 51.0No30100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 53.0 65.0 12.0 51.0Yes203100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01-
High needs- 60.01-
EL and Former EL- 60.01-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students31931498Yes31931599Yes918998Yes
High needs11311097Yes11311097Yes363597Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged717099Yes717099Yes22---
EL and Former EL1---1---1---
Students w/ disabilities615895Yes615895Yes19---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian3---3-------
Afr. Amer./Black1---1-------
Hispanic/Latino2---2-------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.4---4-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1---1---
White30830398Yes30830499Yes908898Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles