Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Hopkins Academy
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Hopkins Academy
Organization Information
District:Hadley (01170000)School type:Middle-High School or K-12
School:Hopkins Academy (01170505)Grades served:07,08,09,10,11,12
Region:Pioneer ValleyTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.3, Target = 97.3CPI = 94.3, Target = 97.3CPI = 94.3, Target = 97.3 95.3 92.4 94.3 1.9 97.3 97.7 7212250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 75, Target = 91.8CPI = 75, Target = 91.8CPI = 75, Target = 91.8 86.0 81.3 75.0 -6.3 91.8 93.0 16220Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------11--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 95.1, Target = 97.3CPI = 95.1, Target = 97.3CPI = 95.1, Target = 97.3 95.3 93.0 95.1 2.1 97.3 97.7 6410875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 79.3, Target = 88.9CPI = 79.3, Target = 88.9CPI = 79.3, Target = 88.9 80.9 79.6 79.3 -0.3 88.9 90.5 4512325No Change
High needsCPI = 52.2, Target = 74.5CPI = 52.2, Target = 74.5CPI = 52.2, Target = 74.5 56.3 66.3 52.2 -14.1 74.5 78.2 8230Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------12--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------15--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 80.7, Target = 90.1CPI = 80.7, Target = 90.1CPI = 80.7, Target = 90.1 83.1 82.1 80.7 -1.4 90.1 91.6 3010925No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 78.3, Target = 93.8CPI = 78.3, Target = 93.8CPI = 78.3, Target = 93.8 89.3 87.6 78.3 -9.3 93.8 94.7 48750Declined
High needs -------15--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------6--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 80.8, Target = 95.2CPI = 80.8, Target = 95.2CPI = 80.8, Target = 95.2 91.7 89.6 80.8 -8.8 95.2 95.9 41650Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 28.9 27.01220 4.4 4.11220
High needs 5.0 13.62225 15.0 22.7220
Econ. Disadvantaged--11---11-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--15---15-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 30.9 27.81080 2.7 3.71080
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 31.1 29.31230 14.1 15.41230
High needs 7.5 8.72325 27.5 43.5230
Econ. Disadvantaged--12---12-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--15---15-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 33.9 29.41090 11.9 13.81090
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 19.8 21.3750 3.3 12.0750
High needs--15---15-
Econ. Disadvantaged--6---6-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 22.2 21.5650 1.4 9.2650
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 51.5, Target = 51SGP = 51.5, Target = 51 44.0 51.5 7.5 51.0Yes11475On Target
High needs --- 51.0-18--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-9--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 44.0 48.0 4.0 51.0Yes10375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 43.0 45.0 2.0 51.0No11650Below Target
High needsSGP = 24.5, Target = 51SGP = 24.5, Target = 51SGP = 24.5, Target = 51 37.0 24.5 -12.5 51.0No200Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-10--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 45.5 45.0 -0.5 51.0No10450Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.03-
High needs- 60.03-
EL and Former EL- 60.03-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 95.3, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.3, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.3, Target = 80 95.5 95.3 -0.2 80.0 90.043100Above Target
High needs --- 80.0 90.011--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.03--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.01--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.02--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.01--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.01--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 94.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.7, Target = 80 100.0 94.7 -5.3 80.0 90.03875On Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 95.5, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.5, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 95.5, Target = 85 97.6 95.5 -2.1 85.0 95.044100Above Target
High needs --- 85.0 95.010--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.01--
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.05--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.01--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.01--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.03--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 100, Target = 85 100.0 100.0 0.0 85.0 95.039100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 1.7, Target = 0.6 1.0 0.6 1.7 -1.1 0.6 0.5371790Declined
High needsDropout Rate = 3.6, Target = 2.8 4.8 2.6 3.6 -1.0 2.8 2.431280Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------12--
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------6--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteDropout Rate = 1.3, Target = 0.4 0.6 0.7 1.3 -0.6 0.4 0.3341520Declined
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students12912899Yes130130100Yes8080100Yes
High needs242396Yes2525100Yes17---
Econ. Disadvantaged13---14---8---
EL and Former EL2---2---2---
Students w/ disabilities15---15---12---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian4---4---4---
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino8---8---6---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.4---4---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1---1---
White11211199Yes113113100Yes6767100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles