Massachusetts School and District Profiles

East Meadow
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - East Meadow
Organization Information
District:Granby (01110000)School type:Elementary School
School:East Meadow (01110004)Grades served:04,05,06
Region:Pioneer ValleyTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.6, Target = 93.1CPI = 89.6, Target = 93.1CPI = 89.6, Target = 93.1 88.1 88.6 89.6 1.0 93.1 94.1 6819450Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 80, Target = 84.2CPI = 80, Target = 84.2CPI = 80, Target = 84.2 72.9 80.0 80.0 0.0 84.2 86.5 707025No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 84.6, Target = 87.6CPI = 84.6, Target = 87.6CPI = 84.6, Target = 87.6 86.5 86.5 84.6 -1.9 87.6 93.3 864725No Change
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 60.7, Target = 82.5CPI = 60.7, Target = 82.5CPI = 60.7, Target = 82.5 70.0 63.7 60.7 -3.0 82.5 85.0 39280Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.3, Target = 93.2CPI = 90.3, Target = 93.2CPI = 90.3, Target = 93.2 88.3 89.5 90.3 0.8 93.2 94.2 6317350Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.3, Target = 90.8CPI = 82.3, Target = 90.8CPI = 82.3, Target = 90.8 84.3 82.5 82.3 -0.2 90.8 92.2 3519125No Change
High needsCPI = 69.6, Target = 81.3CPI = 69.6, Target = 81.3CPI = 69.6, Target = 81.3 68.0 71.1 69.6 -1.5 81.3 84.0 246925No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 70.7, Target = 70.6CPI = 70.7, Target = 70.6 67.9 67.9 70.7 2.8 70.6 84.0 274675On Target
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 54.5, Target = 76.4CPI = 54.5, Target = 76.4CPI = 54.5, Target = 76.4 59.5 63.7 54.5 -9.2 76.4 79.8 21280Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.1, Target = 90.8CPI = 84.1, Target = 90.8CPI = 84.1, Target = 90.8 84.2 83.8 84.1 0.3 90.8 92.1 2917150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.2, Target = 93.5CPI = 88.2, Target = 93.5CPI = 88.2, Target = 93.5 88.9 88.6 88.2 -0.4 93.5 94.5 765525No Change
High needs  75.0---- 87.5-24--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------16--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.6, Target = 93.6CPI = 90.6, Target = 93.6CPI = 90.6, Target = 93.6 89.0 89.1 90.6 1.5 93.6 94.5 794875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 17.4 21.619425 5.0 4.61940
High needs 5.7 12.97025 11.4 12.9700
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 17.04725 5.1 10.6470
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities 6.5 3.6280 25.8 28.6280
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--15---15-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 19.0 23.117325 4.3 4.61730
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 23.9 33.519125 9.5 8.91910
High needs 8.6 10.16925 20.0 18.8690
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.1 10.94625 23.1 21.7460
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities 6.5 3.6280 29.0 35.7280
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 25.5 35.717125 8.7 6.417125
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 16.5 21.85525 3.8 1.85525
High needs--24---24-
Econ. Disadvantaged--16---16-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 17.1 25.04825 2.6 2.14825
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51 61.0 67.0 6.0 51.0Yes193100Above Target
High needsSGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51 59.0 66.0 7.0 51.0Yes70100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 56.0 65.0 9.0 51.0Yes47100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 61.0 60.0 -1.0 51.0No28100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-15--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51 61.0 68.0 7.0 51.0Yes172100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51 59.5 67.0 7.5 51.0No190100Above Target
High needsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 53.5 60.0 6.5 51.0No69100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 67.5, Target = 51SGP = 67.5, Target = 51SGP = 67.5, Target = 51 50.0 67.5 17.5 51.0No46100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-8--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 48.0 50.0 2.0 51.0No2850Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-3--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 68.5, Target = 51SGP = 68.5, Target = 51SGP = 68.5, Target = 51 62.0 68.5 6.5 51.0No170100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.04-
High needs- 60.04-
EL and Former EL- 60.04-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students20719596Yes20719396Yes635695Yes
High needs767196Yes767196Yes272593No
Econ. Disadvantaged504998Yes504896Yes18---
EL and Former EL9---9---2---
Students w/ disabilities312895Yes312895Yes11---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian3---3-------
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino15---15---5---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White18617497Yes18617396Yes564995Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles