Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Grafton High School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Grafton High School
Organization Information
District:Grafton (01100000)School type:High School
School:Grafton High School (01100505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:CentralTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 98.5, Target = 99.2CPI = 98.5, Target = 99.2 98.7 99.2 98.5 -0.7 99.2 99.4 58195100Above Target
High needsCPI = 92.4, Target = 96.4CPI = 92.4, Target = 96.4CPI = 92.4, Target = 96.4 93.8 97.1 92.4 -4.7 96.4 96.9 31360Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------16--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 98.7, Target = 99.1CPI = 98.7, Target = 99.1 98.4 99.2 98.7 -0.5 99.1 99.2 51170100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.2, Target = 97.8CPI = 95.2, Target = 97.8CPI = 95.2, Target = 97.8 96.2 93.2 95.2 2.0 97.8 98.1 6719150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 77.3, Target = 92.2CPI = 77.3, Target = 92.2CPI = 77.3, Target = 92.2 86.7 79.4 77.3 -2.1 92.2 93.4 283325No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------15--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------16--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.2, Target = 97.8CPI = 95.2, Target = 97.8CPI = 95.2, Target = 97.8 96.3 94.6 95.2 0.6 97.8 98.2 5816750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.4, Target = 97.3CPI = 94.4, Target = 97.3CPI = 94.4, Target = 97.3 95.4 94.3 94.4 0.1 97.3 97.7 6519350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 81.9, Target = 92CPI = 81.9, Target = 92CPI = 81.9, Target = 92 86.3 82.6 81.9 -0.7 92.0 93.2 453625No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------16--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94, Target = 97.1CPI = 94, Target = 97.1CPI = 94, Target = 97.1 95.0 94.4 94.0 -0.4 97.1 97.5 5116825No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 60.3 66.21950 0.0 0.51950
High needs 27.9 25.0360 0.0 2.8360
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--16---16-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 60.4 65.91700 0.0 0.61700
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 63.6 70.219125 4.3 2.119125
High needs 22.2 21.2330 13.3 12.1330
Econ. Disadvantaged--15---15-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--19---19-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--16---16-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 63.4 68.91670 3.1 1.816725
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 40.2 39.91930 0.6 1.01930
High needs 9.3 8.3360 2.3 5.6360
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--16---16-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 39.1 38.71680 0.6 0.61680
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 57.0 50.0 -7.0 51.0No18450Below Target
High needsSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 56.0 45.0 -11.0 51.0No3150Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-15--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-16--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 57.5 50.0 -7.5 51.0No16050Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 41.0 40.0 -1.0 51.0Yes18275On Target
High needsSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 38.5 44.0 5.5 51.0No3050Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-14--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-16--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 39.5, Target = 51SGP = 39.5, Target = 51SGP = 39.5, Target = 51 42.0 39.5 -2.5 51.0Yes15875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01-
High needs- 60.01-
EL and Former EL- 60.01-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 89.9, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 89.9, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 89.9, Target = 80 90.3 89.9 -0.4 80.0 90.016975On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 72.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 72.7, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 72.7, Target = 80 67.4 72.7 5.3 80.0 90.05550Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.01--
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.026--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.01--
Asian --- 80.0 90.07--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.04--
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.08--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.05--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 91, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 91, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 91, Target = 80 90.8 91.0 0.2 80.0 90.014475On Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 92, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 92, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 92, Target = 85 95.2 92.0 -3.2 85.0 95.017675On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 72.1, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 72.1, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 72.1, Target = 85 85.4 72.1 -13.3 85.0 95.0430Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.019--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.012--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.04--
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.06--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.01--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 92.8, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.8, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.8, Target = 85 94.3 92.8 -1.5 85.0 95.015375On Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 1.1, Target = 1.4 2.4 1.1 1.1 0.0 1.4 1.24878775On Target
High needsDropout Rate = 4.1, Target = 2.9 4.9 4.2 4.1 0.1 2.9 2.52614725No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------64--
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilities -------92--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian -------44--
Afr. Amer./Black -------10--
Hispanic/Latino -------29--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 1.3, Target = 1.1 1.9 1.1 1.3 -0.2 1.1 1.03468425No Change
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students201201100Yes19919799Yes201201100Yes
High needs4040100Yes393795Yes4040100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged20---20---20---
EL and Former EL5---5---5---
Students w/ disabilities22---21---22---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian16---16---16---
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino6---6---6---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.4---4---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White175175100Yes17317299Yes175175100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles