Massachusetts School and District Profiles

West Parish
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - West Parish
Organization Information
District:Gloucester (01070000)School type:Elementary School
School:West Parish (01070050)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.6, Target = 92.1CPI = 92.6, Target = 92.1 86.4 90.2 92.6 2.4 92.1 93.2 8215375On Target
High needsCPI = 86.2, Target = 85.9CPI = 86.2, Target = 85.9 75.9 81.4 86.2 4.8 85.9 88.0 906575On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 88.8, Target = 86.5CPI = 88.8, Target = 86.5CPI = 88.8, Target = 86.5 85.3 85.3 88.8 3.5 86.5 92.7 9540100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 80.6, Target = 78.8CPI = 80.6, Target = 78.8CPI = 80.6, Target = 78.8 63.7 77.8 80.6 2.8 78.8 81.9 8940100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.2, Target = 92.7CPI = 92.2, Target = 92.7 87.4 90.1 92.2 2.1 92.7 93.7 7413775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.3, Target = 89.3CPI = 90.3, Target = 89.3 81.6 90.9 90.3 -0.6 89.3 90.8 7215275On Target
High needsCPI = 84.8, Target = 81.7CPI = 84.8, Target = 81.7CPI = 84.8, Target = 81.7 68.6 85.7 84.8 -0.9 81.7 84.3 8664100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 87.2, Target = 87.5CPI = 87.2, Target = 87.5 86.4 86.4 87.2 0.8 87.5 93.2 903975On Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 78.2, Target = 72.6CPI = 78.2, Target = 72.6CPI = 78.2, Target = 72.6 53.0 84.0 78.2 -5.8 72.6 76.5 8439100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.4, Target = 89.6CPI = 90.4, Target = 89.6 82.2 91.3 90.4 -0.9 89.6 91.1 6513675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.7, Target = 84.4CPI = 80.7, Target = 84.4CPI = 80.7, Target = 84.4 73.3 80.7 80.7 0.0 84.4 86.7 494825No Change
High needsCPI = 72.8, Target = 76.4CPI = 72.8, Target = 76.4CPI = 72.8, Target = 76.4 59.6 73.3 72.8 -0.5 76.4 79.8 682325No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------11--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------2--
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 82.1, Target = 86.1CPI = 82.1, Target = 86.1CPI = 82.1, Target = 86.1 76.2 83.0 82.1 -0.9 86.1 88.1 363925No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 21.3 20.91530 3.7 0.015325
High needs 10.8 7.7650 8.1 0.06525
Econ. Disadvantaged 23.5 12.5400 8.8 0.04025
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 1.9 0.0400 9.4 0.04025
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 19.7 19.01370 3.5 0.013725
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 32.1 41.415225 2.4 2.015225
High needs 16.0 23.46425 4.0 4.7640
Econ. Disadvantaged 28.6 33.33925 2.9 5.1390
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 5.7 5.1390 5.7 7.7390
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 29.4 41.213625 1.4 2.21360
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 8.2 16.74825 4.9 8.3480
High needs 6.7 8.72325 6.7 13.0230
Econ. Disadvantaged--11---11-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--19---19-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--2---2-
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 9.4 15.43925 3.8 5.1390
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 64.0 43.0 -21.0 51.0Yes10775On Target
High needsSGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51 50.0 44.5 -5.5 51.0No4650Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-25--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 48.0 41.0 -7.0 51.0No3450Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-6--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 66.0 40.0 -26.0 51.0No9325Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 73.0 55.0 -18.0 51.0No10675On Target
High needsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 70.0 49.0 -21.0 51.0No4550Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-24--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 70.0 39.0 -31.0 51.0No3325Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-6--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 73.0 55.0 -18.0 51.0No9275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.02-
High needs- 60.02-
EL and Former EL- 60.02-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students16015698Yes16015597Yes4949100Yes
High needs716794No716695Yes2424100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged464291No464191No12---
EL and Former EL3---3---1---
Students w/ disabilities434094No433994No19---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.3---3---2---
Asian2---2---1---
Afr. Amer./Black6---6---3---
Hispanic/Latino6---6---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.2---2---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White14113898Yes14113797Yes3939100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles