Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Beeman Memorial
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Beeman Memorial
Organization Information
District:Gloucester (01070000)School type:Elementary School
School:Beeman Memorial (01070010)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.1, Target = 87.5CPI = 88.1, Target = 87.5 78.6 90.7 88.1 -2.6 87.5 89.3 6215475On Target
High needsCPI = 83, Target = 83.3CPI = 83, Target = 83.3 71.4 87.4 83.0 -4.4 83.3 85.7 818775On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83.6, Target = 88.3CPI = 83.6, Target = 88.3CPI = 83.6, Target = 88.3 87.2 87.2 83.6 -3.6 88.3 93.6 82760Declined
EL and Former EL -------12--
Students w/ disabilities -------23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.4, Target = 87.9CPI = 89.4, Target = 87.9CPI = 89.4, Target = 87.9 79.3 91.7 89.4 -2.3 87.9 89.7 58120100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.1, Target = 80.9CPI = 85.1, Target = 80.9CPI = 85.1, Target = 80.9 67.2 83.9 85.1 1.2 80.9 83.6 49154100Above Target
High needsCPI = 77.6, Target = 76.3CPI = 77.6, Target = 76.3CPI = 77.6, Target = 76.3 59.3 79.7 77.6 -2.1 76.3 79.7 5787100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 76.6, Target = 80.8CPI = 76.6, Target = 80.8CPI = 76.6, Target = 80.8 79.1 79.1 76.6 -2.5 80.8 89.6 507625No Change
EL and Former EL -------12--
Students w/ disabilities -------23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------7--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.3, Target = 82CPI = 87.3, Target = 82CPI = 87.3, Target = 82 69.2 84.8 87.3 2.5 82.0 84.6 46120100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 63.2, Target = 87.1CPI = 63.2, Target = 87.1CPI = 63.2, Target = 87.1 77.9 71.1 63.2 -7.9 87.1 89.0 15510Declined
High needsCPI = 50, Target = 83.7CPI = 50, Target = 83.7CPI = 50, Target = 83.7 72.1 68.6 50.0 -18.6 83.7 86.1 11310Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 49.1, Target = 72CPI = 49.1, Target = 72CPI = 49.1, Target = 72 69.4 69.4 49.1 -20.3 72.0 84.7 16280Declined
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 65.5, Target = 87.3CPI = 65.5, Target = 87.3CPI = 65.5, Target = 87.3 78.2 73.5 65.5 -8.0 87.3 89.1 5370Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 9.3 11.015425 1.2 2.61540
High needs 5.9 5.7870 2.0 4.6870
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.8 5.3760 2.3 5.3760
EL and Former EL--12---12-
Students w/ disabilities--23---23-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 8.7 11.712025 1.6 1.71200
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 14.9 21.415425 5.0 4.515425
High needs 9.9 6.9870 6.9 6.9870
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.6 6.6760 7.0 7.9760
EL and Former EL--12---12-
Students w/ disabilities--23---23-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--7---7-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 14.2 22.512025 5.5 4.212025
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 1.8 0.0510 10.5 19.6510
High needs 0.0 0.0310 14.3 32.3310
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0280 14.8 32.1280
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 2.0 0.0370 8.2 13.5370
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 69.0 42.0 -27.0 51.0No10350Below Target
High needsSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 70.0 39.0 -31.0 51.0No6125Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 70.0 37.0 -33.0 51.0No5225Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-9--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 70.5 41.0 -29.5 51.0No7750Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 66.5 48.0 -18.5 51.0No10350Below Target
High needsSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 69.0 40.0 -29.0 51.0No6125Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 40.5, Target = 51SGP = 40.5, Target = 51SGP = 40.5, Target = 51 67.0 40.5 -26.5 51.0No5250Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-9--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-10--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 65.5 46.0 -19.5 51.0Yes7775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.017-
High needs- 60.017-
EL and Former EL- 60.017-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students16816699Yes16816699Yes545398Yes
High needs9696100Yes9696100Yes333297Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged8585100Yes8585100Yes302997Yes
EL and Former EL15---15---3---
Students w/ disabilities23---23---12---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian7---7---1---
Afr. Amer./Black2---2---1---
Hispanic/Latino20---20---5---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.11---11---8---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White12712598Yes12712598Yes393897Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles