Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Georgetown Middle School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Georgetown Middle School
Organization Information
District:Georgetown (01050000)School type:Middle School
School:Georgetown Middle School (01050305)Grades served:07,08
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.7, Target = 95.6CPI = 95.7, Target = 95.6 93.4 91.9 95.7 3.8 95.6 96.7 8423875On Target
High needsCPI = 79.9, Target = 85.7CPI = 79.9, Target = 85.7CPI = 79.9, Target = 85.7 78.6 72.5 79.9 7.4 85.7 89.3 453650Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------15--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 74, Target = 79.2CPI = 74, Target = 79.2CPI = 74, Target = 79.2 68.8 65.1 74.0 8.9 79.2 84.4 642550Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 95.7, Target = 95.5CPI = 95.7, Target = 95.5 93.2 92.0 95.7 3.7 95.5 96.6 8122975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.2, Target = 87.9CPI = 82.2, Target = 87.9CPI = 82.2, Target = 87.9 81.8 84.5 82.2 -2.3 87.9 90.9 6023725No Change
High needsCPI = 48.6, Target = 72.2CPI = 48.6, Target = 72.2CPI = 48.6, Target = 72.2 58.3 54.3 48.6 -5.7 72.2 79.2 5360Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------15--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 38, Target = 65.5CPI = 38, Target = 65.5CPI = 38, Target = 65.5 48.2 44.3 38.0 -6.3 65.5 74.1 12250Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 82.1, Target = 87.8CPI = 82.1, Target = 87.8CPI = 82.1, Target = 87.8 81.7 84.6 82.1 -2.5 87.8 90.9 5122825No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 73.8, Target = 86CPI = 73.8, Target = 86CPI = 73.8, Target = 86 79.0 78.0 73.8 -4.2 86.0 89.5 451240Declined
High needsCPI = 58.7, Target = 75.8CPI = 58.7, Target = 75.8CPI = 58.7, Target = 75.8 63.7 59.5 58.7 -0.8 75.8 81.9 382325No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------11--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 73.1, Target = 85.9CPI = 73.1, Target = 85.9CPI = 73.1, Target = 85.9 78.9 78.2 73.1 -5.1 85.9 89.5 281180Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 14.2 19.723825 3.1 2.123825
High needs 1.4 2.83625 14.3 11.13625
Econ. Disadvantaged--15---15-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 2.1 0.0250 20.8 16.02525
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 14.1 18.822925 2.9 2.222925
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 24.9 30.023725 10.6 8.923725
High needs 2.9 2.8360 44.3 47.2360
Econ. Disadvantaged--15---15-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 2.1 0.0250 58.3 60.0250
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 24.8 29.422825 10.3 8.822825
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 0.0 3.212425 5.5 7.31240
High needs 0.0 0.0230 20.7 21.7230
Econ. Disadvantaged--11---11-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 0.0 3.411825 4.6 7.61180
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 61.5, Target = 51SGP = 61.5, Target = 51SGP = 61.5, Target = 51 36.0 61.5 25.5 51.0Yes232100Above Target
High needsSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 35.0 56.0 21.0 51.0Yes35100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-15--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 35.5 57.0 21.5 51.0Yes24100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 36.0 60.0 24.0 51.0Yes223100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 44.0 56.0 12.0 51.0No23175On Target
High needsSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 52.0 47.0 -5.0 51.0No3550Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-15--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 48.0 58.0 10.0 51.0No2475On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 44.0 56.0 12.0 51.0No22275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01-
High needs- 60.01-
EL and Former EL- 60.01-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students239239100Yes239238100Yes12512499Yes
High needs3737100Yes3737100Yes2323100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged16---16---11---
EL and Former EL1---1---1---
Students w/ disabilities2525100Yes2525100Yes16---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian2---2-------
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino2---2---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.6---6---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White229229100Yes229228100Yes11911899Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles