Massachusetts School and District Profiles

J F Kennedy Memorial
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - J F Kennedy Memorial
Organization Information
District:Franklin (01010000)School type:Elementary School
School:J F Kennedy Memorial (01010013)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.2, Target = 96.3CPI = 95.2, Target = 96.3CPI = 95.2, Target = 96.3 93.7 92.7 95.2 2.5 96.3 96.9 95219100Above Target
High needsCPI = 84.3, Target = 88.2CPI = 84.3, Target = 88.2CPI = 84.3, Target = 88.2 79.8 81.4 84.3 2.9 88.2 89.9 854350Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------15--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 79.5, Target = 86.5CPI = 79.5, Target = 86.5CPI = 79.5, Target = 86.5 76.8 74.2 79.5 5.3 86.5 88.4 872850Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 98, Target = 98.5CPI = 98, Target = 98.5 97.8 100.0 98.0 -2.0 98.5 98.9 9125100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.5, Target = 96.3CPI = 94.5, Target = 96.3CPI = 94.5, Target = 96.3 93.6 91.5 94.5 3.0 96.3 96.8 88183100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 95.4, Target = 97.4CPI = 95.4, Target = 97.4CPI = 95.4, Target = 97.4 95.5 94.1 95.4 1.3 97.4 97.8 95219100Above Target
High needsCPI = 81.4, Target = 90.7CPI = 81.4, Target = 90.7CPI = 81.4, Target = 90.7 84.1 82.4 81.4 -1.0 90.7 92.1 734325No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------15--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 77.7, Target = 89CPI = 77.7, Target = 89CPI = 77.7, Target = 89 81.1 73.3 77.7 4.4 89.0 90.6 832850Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 100, Target = 96.4CPI = 100, Target = 96.4CPI = 100, Target = 96.4 94.6 100.0 100.0 0.0 96.4 97.3 9625100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.7, Target = 97.2CPI = 94.7, Target = 97.2CPI = 94.7, Target = 97.2 95.2 93.8 94.7 0.9 97.2 97.6 89183100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.4, Target = 95.9CPI = 93.4, Target = 95.9CPI = 93.4, Target = 95.9 93.0 94.0 93.4 -0.6 95.9 96.5 9483100Above Target
High needs -------15--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------4--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------11--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.5, Target = 95.8CPI = 92.5, Target = 95.8CPI = 92.5, Target = 95.8 92.8 92.9 92.5 -0.4 95.8 96.4 8667100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 18.8 31.121925 2.1 1.821925
High needs 2.1 7.04325 8.5 7.04325
Econ. Disadvantaged--15---15-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 3.62825 13.3 10.72825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 36.0 40.02525 0.0 0.02525
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 17.8 30.618325 2.5 2.218325
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 45.3 63.921925 2.1 1.821925
High needs 19.1 25.64325 10.6 7.04325
Econ. Disadvantaged--15---15-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 10.0 14.32825 16.7 7.12825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 80.0 92.02525 0.0 0.02525
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 42.1 61.218325 2.5 2.218325
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 32.9 48.28325 1.3 1.2830
High needs--15---15-
Econ. Disadvantaged--4---4-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--11---11-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--11---11-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 31.3 43.36725 1.5 1.5670
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51 51.0 68.0 17.0 51.0Yes155100Above Target
High needs --- 51.0-32--
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-11--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-17--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51 48.0 67.0 19.0 51.0Yes129100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51 43.5 69.0 25.5 51.0Yes155100Above Target
High needsSGP = 65.5, Target = 51SGP = 65.5, Target = 51SGP = 65.5, Target = 51 39.5 65.5 26.0 51.0No32100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-11--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-17--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51 44.0 67.0 23.0 51.0Yes129100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.02-
High needs- 60.02-
EL and Former EL- 60.02-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students220220100Yes220220100Yes8484100Yes
High needs4444100Yes4444100Yes16---
Econ. Disadvantaged16---16---5---
EL and Former EL2---2-------
Students w/ disabilities2828100Yes2828100Yes11---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian2525100Yes2525100Yes11---
Afr. Amer./Black2---2-------
Hispanic/Latino5---5---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.4---4---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1---1---
White183183100Yes183183100Yes6767100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles