Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Helen Keller Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Helen Keller Elementary
Organization Information
District:Franklin (01010000)School type:Elementary School
School:Helen Keller Elementary (01010012)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.2, Target = 96.2CPI = 92.2, Target = 96.2CPI = 92.2, Target = 96.2 93.4 89.9 92.2 2.3 96.2 96.7 8024775On Target
High needsCPI = 80.6, Target = 89.2CPI = 80.6, Target = 89.2CPI = 80.6, Target = 89.2 81.4 75.4 80.6 5.2 89.2 90.7 726350Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------15--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 77, Target = 88.9CPI = 77, Target = 88.9CPI = 77, Target = 88.9 80.9 68.1 77.0 8.9 88.9 90.5 835150Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------11--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 92, Target = 96.2CPI = 92, Target = 96.2CPI = 92, Target = 96.2 93.5 90.0 92.0 2.0 96.2 96.8 7222950Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.6, Target = 95.7CPI = 92.6, Target = 95.7CPI = 92.6, Target = 95.7 92.6 87.3 92.6 5.3 95.7 96.3 8224775On Target
High needsCPI = 80.6, Target = 86.9CPI = 80.6, Target = 86.9CPI = 80.6, Target = 86.9 77.5 68.8 80.6 11.8 86.9 88.8 706350Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------15--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 77.9, Target = 86.1CPI = 77.9, Target = 86.1CPI = 77.9, Target = 86.1 76.1 62.5 77.9 15.4 86.1 88.1 835150Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------11--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 92.1, Target = 95.9CPI = 92.1, Target = 95.9CPI = 92.1, Target = 95.9 92.9 87.2 92.1 4.9 95.9 96.5 7622975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.3, Target = 93.4CPI = 82.3, Target = 93.4CPI = 82.3, Target = 93.4 88.6 80.7 82.3 1.6 93.4 94.3 549950Improved Below Target
High needs  70.8---- 85.4-24--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------5--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities  69.3---- 84.7-20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 81.5, Target = 93.2CPI = 81.5, Target = 93.2CPI = 81.5, Target = 93.2 88.4 79.9 81.5 1.6 93.2 94.2 339350Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 12.9 25.924725 2.4 2.42470
High needs 1.8 3.26325 10.7 6.36325
Econ. Disadvantaged--15---15-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0510 15.0 7.85125
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--11---11-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 12.2 24.922925 2.6 2.222925
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 31.0 49.024725 3.6 3.224725
High needs 10.7 12.76325 14.3 9.56325
Econ. Disadvantaged--15---15-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 5.0 7.85125 17.5 11.85125
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--11---11-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 30.4 47.622925 3.9 3.522925
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 19.3 19.2990 5.7 9.1990
High needs--24---24-
Econ. Disadvantaged--5---5-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--20---20-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 19.5 18.3930 6.1 9.7930
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51 40.0 55.5 15.5 51.0Yes160100Above Target
High needsSGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51SGP = 35, Target = 51 29.0 35.0 6.0 51.0Yes3375On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-6--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51 27.0 32.0 5.0 51.0Yes2875On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-6--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 40.0 53.0 13.0 51.0Yes14875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 64.5, Target = 51SGP = 64.5, Target = 51SGP = 64.5, Target = 51 33.5 64.5 31.0 51.0Yes160100Above Target
High needsSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 27.5 62.0 34.5 51.0Yes33100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-6--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 58.5, Target = 51SGP = 58.5, Target = 51SGP = 58.5, Target = 51 40.0 58.5 18.5 51.0Yes28100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-6--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 33.0 64.0 31.0 51.0Yes148100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.05-
High needs- 60.05-
EL and Former EL- 60.05-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students250249100Yes250249100Yes10110099Yes
High needs6565100Yes6565100Yes2525100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged17---17---6---
EL and Former EL4---4---1---
Students w/ disabilities5353100Yes5353100Yes2121100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian11---11---4---
Afr. Amer./Black1---1-------
Hispanic/Latino3---3---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1-------
White231230100Yes231230100Yes959499Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles