Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Hemenway
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Hemenway
Organization Information
District:Framingham (01000000)School type:Elementary School
School:Hemenway (01000015)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.1, Target = 95.4CPI = 92.1, Target = 95.4CPI = 92.1, Target = 95.4 92.1 93.4 92.1 -1.3 95.4 96.1 7927125No Change
High needsCPI = 84.1, Target = 89.7CPI = 84.1, Target = 89.7CPI = 84.1, Target = 89.7 82.4 84.6 84.1 -0.5 89.7 91.2 849125No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 84.9, Target = 85.2CPI = 84.9, Target = 85.2 83.9 83.9 84.9 1.0 85.2 92.0 873875On Target
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 80.7, Target = 87.3CPI = 80.7, Target = 87.3CPI = 80.7, Target = 87.3 78.3 81.6 80.7 -0.9 87.3 89.2 906675On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------16--
Afr. Amer./Black -------12--
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.1, Target = 95.7CPI = 92.1, Target = 95.7CPI = 92.1, Target = 95.7 92.7 93.6 92.1 -1.5 95.7 96.4 7322225No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.5, Target = 95.4CPI = 90.5, Target = 95.4CPI = 90.5, Target = 95.4 92.1 88.9 90.5 1.6 95.4 96.1 7327150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 82.1, Target = 90.1CPI = 82.1, Target = 90.1CPI = 82.1, Target = 90.1 83.0 75.6 82.1 6.5 90.1 91.5 769150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 85.5, Target = 81.5CPI = 85.5, Target = 81.5CPI = 85.5, Target = 81.5 79.8 79.8 85.5 5.7 81.5 89.9 8638100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 77.3, Target = 88.4CPI = 77.3, Target = 88.4CPI = 77.3, Target = 88.4 80.1 70.6 77.3 6.7 88.4 90.1 826650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------16--
Afr. Amer./Black -------12--
Hispanic/Latino -------14--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.5, Target = 95.6CPI = 90.5, Target = 95.6CPI = 90.5, Target = 95.6 92.5 89.0 90.5 1.5 95.6 96.3 6522250Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.7, Target = 94.7CPI = 92.7, Target = 94.7CPI = 92.7, Target = 94.7 90.9 91.1 92.7 1.6 94.7 95.5 9289100Above Target
High needsCPI = 85.8, Target = 90.4CPI = 85.8, Target = 90.4CPI = 85.8, Target = 90.4 83.6 81.5 85.8 4.3 90.4 91.8 953075On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------11--
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities  79.8---- 89.9-22--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.4, Target = 94.9CPI = 92.4, Target = 94.9CPI = 92.4, Target = 94.9 91.3 91.0 92.4 1.4 94.9 95.7 8576100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 33.5 21.42710 0.8 1.82710
High needs 12.0 7.7910 2.4 4.4910
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.7 2.6380 6.5 5.33825
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 11.5 9.1660 3.3 6.1660
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--16---16-
Afr. Amer./Black--12---12-
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 31.6 21.62220 0.5 1.82220
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 45.5 41.32710 5.1 3.027125
High needs 16.5 16.5910 10.6 6.69125
Econ. Disadvantaged 22.6 15.8380 6.5 2.63825
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 12.9 15.26625 12.9 9.16625
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--16---16-
Afr. Amer./Black--12---12-
Hispanic/Latino--14---14-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 44.2 40.52220 5.3 2.722225
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 39.1 34.8890 4.6 2.28925
High needs 14.8 16.73025 7.4 3.33025
Econ. Disadvantaged--11---11-
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--22---22-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 37.3 32.9760 4.5 2.67625
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 72.0 48.0 -24.0 51.0No16550Below Target
High needsSGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51SGP = 56.5, Target = 51 62.0 56.5 -5.5 51.0No5275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-20--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 61.0 60.0 -1.0 51.0No39100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-11--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 68.0 48.0 -20.0 51.0No13950Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 69.0 47.0 -22.0 51.0No16550Below Target
High needsSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 63.5 44.0 -19.5 51.0Yes5275On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-20--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 59.5 48.0 -11.5 51.0Yes3975On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-11--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 70.0 47.0 -23.0 51.0Yes13975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.019-
High needs- 60.019-
EL and Former EL- 60.019-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students280280100Yes280280100Yes9292100Yes
High needs9898100Yes9898100Yes3333100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged4444100Yes4444100Yes14---
EL and Former EL9---9---4---
Students w/ disabilities6969100Yes6969100Yes2424100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian17---17---6---
Afr. Amer./Black12---12---3---
Hispanic/Latino17---17---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White227227100Yes227227100Yes7878100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles