Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Carlton M. Viveiros Elementary School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Carlton M. Viveiros Elementary School

Organization Information

District:

Fall River (00950000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Carlton M. Viveiros Elementary School (00950009)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Commissioner's Districts

Title I status:

Title I School (SW)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		64.6	79.7	78.9	-0.8	79.4	82.3	25	289	75	On Target
High needs		62.9	77.6	76.8	-0.8	78.4	81.5	55	225	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		77.7	77.7	78.0	0.3	79.6	88.9	55	208	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		46.4	-	-	-	-	73.2	-	29	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		44.3	61.1	57.1	-4.0	67.5	72.2	29	63	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	22	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		55.8	76.4	79.7	3.3	74.2	77.9	80	69	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		66.3	79.8	82.0	2.2	77.5	83.2	41	32	100	Above Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		68.1	80.9	78.3	-2.6	81.4	84.1	10	159	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		61.5	82.7	84.3	1.6	77.5	80.8	45	286	100	Above Target
High needs		60.7	82.1	82.8	0.7	77.1	80.4	79	222	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		82.6	82.6	83.8	1.2	84.1	91.3	80	205	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		39.3	-	-	-	-	69.7	-	29	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		46.7	71.1	65.1	-6.0	68.9	73.4	52	63	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	22	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		59.0	81.1	84.0	2.9	76.1	79.5	85	67	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		56.3	79.8	82.0	2.2	70.9	78.2	46	32	100	Above Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		63.8	83.4	84.8	1.4	78.9	81.9	32	158	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		53.2	87.5	83.4	-4.1	72.7	76.6	59	74	100	Above Target
High needs		51.6	87.5	80.9	-6.6	71.8	75.8	89	55	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		88.6	88.6	81.3	-7.3	89.6	94.3	93	52	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	7	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		57.7	88.3	83.7	-4.6	75.3	78.9	44	43	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	9.1	6.2	289	0	9.1	11.4	289	0
High needs	7.4	4.9	225	0	10.3	12.9	225	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	8.1	5.3	208	0	10.8	12.0	208	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	29	-	-	-	29	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	63	0	26.9	34.9	63	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	22	-	-	-	22	-
Hispanic/Latino	7.4	7.2	69	0	9.3	10.1	69	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	11.5	6.3	32	0	3.8	12.5	32	0
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	11.0	5.7	159	0	10.3	12.6	159	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	17.5	26.2	286	25	7.1	8.0	286	0
High needs	16.7	27.5	222	25	7.9	9.9	222	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	16.8	28.3	205	25	8.1	9.3	205	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	29	-	-	-	29	-
Students w/ disabilities	3.9	9.5	63	25	17.6	27.0	63	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	22	-	-	-	22	-
Hispanic/Latino	18.9	23.9	67	25	9.4	10.4	67	0
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	15.4	31.3	32	25	15.4	6.3	32	25
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	18.6	25.3	158	25	5.5	7.6	158	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	15.4	9.5	74	0	2.6	1.4	74	25
High needs	14.1	9.1	55	0	3.1	1.8	55	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	13.6	9.6	52	0	1.7	0.0	52	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	7	-	-	-	7	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	11.1	9.3	43	0	0.0	0.0	43	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		60.0	54.0	-6.0	51.0	No	149	75	On Target
High needs		58.5	52.0	-6.5	51.0	No	116	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		58.0	52.0	-6.0	51.0	No	107	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		37.0	48.0	11.0	51.0	No	32	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		68.0	57.0	-11.0	51.0	Yes	35	75	On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		58.0	52.0	-6.0	51.0	No	84	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		70.0	75.0	5.0	51.0	No	147	100	Above Target
High needs		70.0	79.0	9.0	51.0	No	114	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		69.0	80.0	11.0	51.0	No	105	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		61.0	62.0	1.0	51.0	No	31	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		72.0	81.0	9.0	51.0	No	34	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	15	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		69.0	70.0	1.0	51.0	Yes	83	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	48.5	60.0	28.00	0
High needs	48.5	60.0	28.00	0
EL and Former EL	48.5	60.0	28.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	334	332	99	Yes	336	336	100	Yes	88	88	100	Yes
High needs	269	267	99	Yes	270	270	100	Yes	69	69	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	245	243	99	Yes	246	246	100	Yes	64	64	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	42	41	98	Yes	42	42	100	Yes	10	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	73	72	99	Yes	73	73	100	Yes	20	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	11	-	-	-	12	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	23	-	-	-	23	-	-	-	5	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	89	87	98	Yes	89	89	100	Yes	22	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	34	34	100	Yes	34	34	100	Yes	7	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
White	176	176	100	Yes	177	177	100	Yes	49	49	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.