Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Leroy Wood
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Leroy Wood
Organization Information
District:Fairhaven (00940000)School type:Elementary School
School:Leroy Wood (00940030)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.8, Target = 96.8CPI = 87.8, Target = 96.8CPI = 87.8, Target = 96.8 94.5 81.2 87.8 6.6 96.8 97.3 6026150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 79.1, Target = 96.7CPI = 79.1, Target = 96.7CPI = 79.1, Target = 96.7 94.4 69.8 79.1 9.3 96.7 97.2 669150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 82.5, Target = 75CPI = 82.5, Target = 75CPI = 82.5, Target = 75 72.7 72.7 82.5 9.8 75.0 86.4 7767100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 64.8, Target = 80.8CPI = 64.8, Target = 80.8CPI = 64.8, Target = 80.8 76.9 57.1 64.8 7.7 80.8 88.5 513250Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.4, Target = 96.8CPI = 88.4, Target = 96.8CPI = 88.4, Target = 96.8 94.5 81.9 88.4 6.5 96.8 97.3 5123050Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 82.8, Target = 96CPI = 82.8, Target = 96CPI = 82.8, Target = 96 93.2 76.1 82.8 6.7 96.0 96.6 3726250Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 73.4, Target = 96.7CPI = 73.4, Target = 96.7CPI = 73.4, Target = 96.7 94.4 65.8 73.4 7.6 96.7 97.2 399150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 78.7, Target = 70.1CPI = 78.7, Target = 70.1CPI = 78.7, Target = 70.1 67.4 67.4 78.7 11.3 70.1 83.7 6167100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 51.6, Target = 85.8CPI = 51.6, Target = 85.8CPI = 51.6, Target = 85.8 83.0 51.3 51.6 0.3 85.8 91.5 163250Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.3, Target = 95.8CPI = 84.3, Target = 95.8CPI = 84.3, Target = 95.8 92.8 77.0 84.3 7.3 95.8 96.4 3023150Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 63.6, Target = 96.7CPI = 63.6, Target = 96.7CPI = 63.6, Target = 96.7 94.3 69.5 63.6 -5.9 96.7 97.2 16900Declined
High needsCPI = 52.9, Target = 79.9CPI = 52.9, Target = 79.9CPI = 52.9, Target = 79.9 75.9 55.3 52.9 -2.4 79.9 88.0 152625No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 63.5, Target = 96.7CPI = 63.5, Target = 96.7CPI = 63.5, Target = 96.7 94.4 70.6 63.5 -7.1 96.7 97.2 4780Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 5.4 14.226125 7.9 4.226125
High needs 0.0 6.69125 16.8 11.09125
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 7.56725 13.2 6.06725
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 3.13225 28.2 25.03225
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 5.7 14.823025 7.6 3.923025
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 14.1 27.526225 11.6 11.82620
High needs 7.9 17.69125 21.8 19.8910
Econ. Disadvantaged 7.9 19.46725 19.7 11.96725
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities 2.6 6.33225 38.5 43.8320
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--12---12-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 13.8 28.623125 11.4 10.82310
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 9.6 5.6900 17.8 17.8900
High needs 0.0 0.0260 36.4 34.6260
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 10.3 6.4780 17.6 19.2780
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51SGP = 64, Target = 51 25.5 64.0 38.5 51.0Yes171100Above Target
High needsSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 21.0 55.0 34.0 51.0Yes59100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51 22.0 55.5 33.5 51.0Yes42100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 64.5, Target = 51SGP = 64.5, Target = 51SGP = 64.5, Target = 51 26.0 64.5 38.5 51.0Yes146100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 16.0 58.0 42.0 51.0Yes173100Above Target
High needsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 12.0 50.0 38.0 51.0Yes59100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 51.5, Target = 51SGP = 51.5, Target = 51 22.0 51.5 29.5 51.0Yes42100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0-1--
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 16.0 59.0 43.0 51.0Yes148100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.06-
High needs- 60.06-
EL and Former EL- 60.06-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students26726499Yes26726599Yes919099Yes
High needs9494100Yes9494100Yes2626100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged7070100Yes7070100Yes18---
EL and Former EL11---11---4---
Students w/ disabilities3232100Yes3232100Yes10---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1---1---
Asian8---8---3---
Afr. Amer./Black3---3---2---
Hispanic/Latino12---12---5---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White23623399Yes23623499Yes797899Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles