Massachusetts School and District Profiles

East Fairhaven
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - East Fairhaven
Organization Information
District:Fairhaven (00940000)School type:Elementary School
School:East Fairhaven (00940010)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 78.8, Target = 93.7CPI = 78.8, Target = 93.7CPI = 78.8, Target = 93.7 89.2 79.7 78.8 -0.9 93.7 94.6 2518925No Change
High needsCPI = 67.9, Target = 91CPI = 67.9, Target = 91CPI = 67.9, Target = 91 84.6 68.1 67.9 -0.2 91.0 92.3 188525No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 69, Target = 75.3CPI = 69, Target = 75.3CPI = 69, Target = 75.3 73.0 73.0 69.0 -4.0 75.3 86.5 20630Declined
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 53.2, Target = 83.4CPI = 53.2, Target = 83.4CPI = 53.2, Target = 83.4 71.5 53.4 53.2 -0.2 83.4 85.8 203925No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 78.8, Target = 93.5CPI = 78.8, Target = 93.5CPI = 78.8, Target = 93.5 88.8 78.3 78.8 0.5 93.5 94.4 1217050Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 75, Target = 90.1CPI = 75, Target = 90.1CPI = 75, Target = 90.1 83.1 78.6 75.0 -3.6 90.1 91.6 151880Declined
High needsCPI = 65.8, Target = 86.3CPI = 65.8, Target = 86.3CPI = 65.8, Target = 86.3 76.5 71.2 65.8 -5.4 86.3 88.3 14840Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 63.3, Target = 77.5CPI = 63.3, Target = 77.5CPI = 63.3, Target = 77.5 75.5 75.5 63.3 -12.2 77.5 87.8 9620Declined
EL and Former EL -------6--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 58.3, Target = 78.9CPI = 58.3, Target = 78.9CPI = 58.3, Target = 78.9 63.9 62.1 58.3 -3.8 78.9 82.0 32390Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 74.7, Target = 90CPI = 74.7, Target = 90CPI = 74.7, Target = 90 82.9 78.2 74.7 -3.5 90.0 91.5 71690Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 60.8, Target = 90.1CPI = 60.8, Target = 90.1CPI = 60.8, Target = 90.1 83.1 73.6 60.8 -12.8 90.1 91.6 14670Declined
High needsCPI = 53.6, Target = 85.9CPI = 53.6, Target = 85.9CPI = 53.6, Target = 85.9 75.9- 53.6 -11.7 85.9 88.0 16280Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------24--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------2--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 60.7, Target = 90.4CPI = 60.7, Target = 90.4CPI = 60.7, Target = 90.4 83.6 75.8 60.7 -15.1 90.4 91.8 3610Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 6.9 6.91890 9.6 12.21890
High needs 2.8 4.78525 19.4 20.0850
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.9 4.86325 9.8 20.6630
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0390 41.4 30.83925
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 7.0 7.11700 10.5 11.81700
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 14.9 12.21880 7.4 13.31880
High needs 12.5 10.7840 15.3 21.4840
Econ. Disadvantaged 11.8 9.7620 11.8 22.6620
EL and Former EL--6---6-
Students w/ disabilities 6.9 2.6390 24.1 23.1390
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 14.0 11.81690 7.6 13.01690
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 2.9 1.5670 13.0 19.4670
High needs 0.0 0.0280 12.9 32.1280
Econ. Disadvantaged--24---24-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--2---2-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 1.7 1.6610 10.2 18.0610
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51 26.0 33.0 7.0 51.0No11950Below Target
High needsSGP = 27.5, Target = 51SGP = 27.5, Target = 51SGP = 27.5, Target = 51 25.0 27.5 2.5 51.0No4850Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 27, Target = 51SGP = 27, Target = 51SGP = 27, Target = 51 24.0 27.0 3.0 51.0No3950Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51 26.0 33.0 7.0 51.0No11150Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 30.5 39.0 8.5 51.0No11850Below Target
High needsSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 35.0 45.0 10.0 51.0No4775On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 33.0 42.0 9.0 51.0No3850Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 32.0 39.0 7.0 51.0No11050Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.08-
High needs- 60.08-
EL and Former EL- 60.08-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students19519198Yes19519097Yes6969100Yes
High needs898798Yes898697Yes3030100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged676597Yes676496Yes26---
EL and Former EL6---6---3---
Students w/ disabilities4040100Yes4040100Yes11---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian2---2-------
Afr. Amer./Black4---4---2---
Hispanic/Latino8---8---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.4---4---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White17617298Yes17617197Yes6363100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles