Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Oliver Ames High

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Oliver Ames High

Organization Information

District:

Easton (00880000)

School type:

High School

School:

Oliver Ames High (00880505)

Grades served:

09,10,11,12

Region:

Southeast

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		98.2	99.4	99.6	0.2	99.0	99.1	87	313	100	Above Target
High needs		94.1	96.8	98.1	1.3	96.6	97.1	83	66	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	32	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		92.1	95.5	97.6	2.1	95.4	96.1	83	42	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		98.5	99.6	99.8	0.2	99.1	99.3	87	260	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		96.3	94.3	96.6	2.3	97.8	98.2	79	313	75	On Target
High needs		86.4	79.4	88.3	8.9	92.1	93.2	75	66	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		90.0	-	-	-	-	95.0	-	32	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		83.8	75.0	85.1	10.1	90.6	91.9	79	42	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	15	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		96.9	96.0	97.4	1.4	98.2	98.5	78	260	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		91.0	89.5	93.1	3.6	94.8	95.5	55	302	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		76.9	75.9	81.6	5.7	86.5	88.5	43	61	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	33	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		70.9	73.0	77.0	4.0	83.0	85.5	52	38	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	14	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		92.0	90.9	93.1	2.2	95.3	96.0	42	254	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	53.2	62.0	313	25	0.0	0.0	313	25
High needs	23.6	28.8	66	25	0.0	0.0	66	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	32	-	-	-	32	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Students w/ disabilities	5.1	21.4	42	25	0.0	0.0	42	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	56.2	62.3	260	25	0.0	0.0	260	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	59.9	67.1	313	25	2.1	0.3	313	25
High needs	24.6	30.3	66	25	8.8	1.5	66	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	32	-	-	-	32	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Students w/ disabilities	12.2	19.0	42	25	9.8	0.0	42	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	15	-	-	-	15	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	62.1	70.0	260	25	0.4	0.0	260	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	19.9	32.8	302	25	0.4	0.7	302	0
High needs	9.4	8.2	61	0	1.9	1.6	61	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	33	-	-	-	33	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Students w/ disabilities	5.3	5.3	38	0	2.6	2.6	38	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	14	-	-	-	14	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	21.0	33.5	254	25	0.0	0.8	254	0

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		34.0	51.5	17.5	51.0	Yes	300	100	Above Target
High needs		40.0	51.0	11.0	51.0	Yes	59	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	29	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		37.5	53.0	15.5	51.0	Yes	37	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		34.0	51.0	17.0	51.0	Yes	252	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		33.0	38.0	5.0	51.0	Yes	301	75	On Target
High needs		30.0	39.0	9.0	51.0	Yes	59	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	29	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		30.0	45.0	15.0	51.0	Yes	37	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		35.0	40.0	5.0	51.0	Yes	253	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	6.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	6.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	6.00	-

Summary > 2016

2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		97.0	97.6	0.6	80.0	90.0	289	100	Above Target
High needs		91.5	90.9	-0.6	80.0	90.0	77	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		89.8	94.6	4.8	80.0	90.0	37	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	9	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	17	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	12	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	80.0	90.0	2	-	-
White		97.2	98.3	1.1	80.0	90.0	240	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2013 Rate	2014 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		95.3	97.3	2.0	85.0	95.0	300	100	Above Target
High needs		86.6	91.5	4.9	85.0	95.0	82	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	5	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		88.9	89.8	0.9	85.0	95.0	49	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	13	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	13	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	14	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	9	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	85.0	95.0	-	-	-
White		96.0	97.6	1.6	85.0	95.0	251	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2015 Annual Dropout Rate About the Data
	0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20	Baseline Rate	2014 Rate	2015 Rate	Change	Annual Target	6 Year Goal	Dropout Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		0.8	0.3	0.4	-0.1	0.5	0.4	76	1176	75	On Target
High needs		0.9	1.2	1.4	-0.2	0.5	0.5	59	212	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		1.4	-	-	-	-	0.7	-	73	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		0.0	0.0	1.3	-1.3	0.0	0.0	64	153	0	Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	38	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	62	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	45	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	35	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
White		0.6	0.3	0.4	-0.1	0.4	0.3	67	993	75	On Target

Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more) About the Data
	2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged	PPI Points
All students	-	-
High needs	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	317	317	100	Yes	317	317	100	Yes	317	317	100	Yes
High needs	69	69	100	Yes	69	69	100	Yes	69	69	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	35	35	100	Yes	35	35	100	Yes	35	35	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	43	43	100	Yes	43	43	100	Yes	43	43	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	13	-	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	13	-	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	17	-	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	12	-	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	261	261	100	Yes	261	261	100	Yes	261	261	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.