Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Mountain View
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Mountain View
Organization Information
District:East Longmeadow (00870000)School type:Elementary School
School:Mountain View (00870015)Grades served:03,04,05
Region:Pioneer ValleyTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.3, Target = 95CPI = 89.3, Target = 95CPI = 89.3, Target = 95 91.5 91.1 89.3 -1.8 95.0 95.8 6729725No Change
High needsCPI = 79.9, Target = 88CPI = 79.9, Target = 88CPI = 79.9, Target = 88 79.5 81.5 79.9 -1.6 88.0 89.8 708725No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 86.3, Target = 88.3CPI = 86.3, Target = 88.3CPI = 86.3, Target = 88.3 87.2 87.2 86.3 -0.9 88.3 93.6 894225No Change
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 72.4, Target = 84.7CPI = 72.4, Target = 84.7CPI = 72.4, Target = 84.7 73.8 75.0 72.4 -2.6 84.7 86.9 71570Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.7, Target = 94.9CPI = 89.7, Target = 94.9CPI = 89.7, Target = 94.9 91.3 91.0 89.7 -1.3 94.9 95.7 6026525No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89, Target = 92.7CPI = 89, Target = 92.7CPI = 89, Target = 92.7 87.4 87.2 89.0 1.8 92.7 93.7 6629750Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 78.4, Target = 87.2CPI = 78.4, Target = 87.2CPI = 78.4, Target = 87.2 78.1 75.0 78.4 3.4 87.2 89.1 608750Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 82.7, Target = 85.4CPI = 82.7, Target = 85.4CPI = 82.7, Target = 85.4 84.1 84.1 82.7 -1.4 85.4 92.1 774225No Change
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 72.4, Target = 83.7CPI = 72.4, Target = 83.7CPI = 72.4, Target = 83.7 72.1 66.2 72.4 6.2 83.7 86.1 715750Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90, Target = 92.4CPI = 90, Target = 92.4CPI = 90, Target = 92.4 86.9 87.3 90.0 2.7 92.4 93.5 6326550Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.6, Target = 90.3CPI = 84.6, Target = 90.3CPI = 84.6, Target = 90.3 83.3 85.8 84.6 -1.2 90.3 91.7 6310725No Change
High needsCPI = 75, Target = 84CPI = 75, Target = 84CPI = 75, Target = 84 72.5 78.7 75.0 -3.7 84.0 86.3 74300Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.7, Target = 90.2CPI = 84.7, Target = 90.2CPI = 84.7, Target = 90.2 83.2 86.7 84.7 -2.0 90.2 91.6 499525No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 21.2 16.22970 2.4 3.02970
High needs 12.0 5.7870 7.6 8.0870
Econ. Disadvantaged 22.0 9.5420 4.9 4.8420
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 3.5 0.0570 12.3 12.3570
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.8 17.42650 2.3 3.02650
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 29.4 35.029725 6.2 4.029725
High needs 13.0 14.98725 16.3 11.58725
Econ. Disadvantaged 24.4 19.0420 9.8 7.14225
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities 5.3 8.85725 24.6 15.85725
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 29.3 37.026525 6.1 3.826525
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 17.8 17.81070 2.2 4.71070
High needs 11.1 0.0300 3.7 13.3300
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--18---18-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 18.5 17.9950 1.2 4.2950
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 71.0 52.0 -19.0 51.0No19575On Target
High needsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 52.5 50.0 -2.5 51.0No5550Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51SGP = 48, Target = 51 68.0 48.0 -20.0 51.0No3050Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-33--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 71.0 51.0 -20.0 51.0No17775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 75.5 57.0 -18.5 51.0No19675On Target
High needsSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 64.0 59.0 -5.0 51.0Yes5575On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 64.0 57.0 -7.0 51.0No3075On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 67.5 59.0 -8.5 51.0Yes3375On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-2--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 75.0 59.0 -16.0 51.0Yes17875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01-
High needs- 60.01-
EL and Former EL- 60.01-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students30730298Yes30730298Yes10910899Yes
High needs949197Yes949197Yes323197Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged464598Yes464598Yes17---
EL and Former EL4---4---2---
Students w/ disabilities615895Yes615895Yes20---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian8---8---3---
Afr. Amer./Black5---5---1---
Hispanic/Latino16---16---5---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.8---8---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White27026799Yes27026799Yes979699Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles