Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Alden School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Alden School

Organization Information
District:Duxbury (00820000)School type:Elementary School
School:Alden School (00820004)Grades served:03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.7, Target = 95CPI = 91.7, Target = 95CPI = 91.7, Target = 95 91.5 92.1 91.7 -0.4 95.0 95.8 7768825No Change
High needsCPI = 75.7, Target = 85.5CPI = 75.7, Target = 85.5CPI = 75.7, Target = 85.5 75.2 78.1 75.7 -2.4 85.5 87.6 4915025No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 80.2, Target = 89.3CPI = 80.2, Target = 89.3CPI = 80.2, Target = 89.3 88.3 88.3 80.2 -8.1 89.3 94.2 68530Declined
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 71.8, Target = 84.7CPI = 71.8, Target = 84.7CPI = 71.8, Target = 84.7 73.8 74.0 71.8 -2.2 84.7 86.9 6910325No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------24--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.7, Target = 95.1CPI = 91.7, Target = 95.1CPI = 91.7, Target = 95.1 91.6 92.1 91.7 -0.4 95.1 95.8 7164225No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 94.5, Target = 95CPI = 94.5, Target = 95 91.5 89.7 94.5 4.8 95.0 95.8 92690100Above Target
High needsCPI = 81.2, Target = 86.1CPI = 81.2, Target = 86.1CPI = 81.2, Target = 86.1 76.2 74.4 81.2 6.8 86.1 88.1 7215050Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 87.3, Target = 85.8CPI = 87.3, Target = 85.8CPI = 87.3, Target = 85.8 84.5 84.5 87.3 2.8 85.8 92.3 9153100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------8--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 75.7, Target = 85.7CPI = 75.7, Target = 85.7CPI = 75.7, Target = 85.7 75.5 70.1 75.7 5.6 85.7 87.8 7910350Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. -------1--
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------24--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 94.3, Target = 95CPI = 94.3, Target = 95 91.5 89.5 94.3 4.8 95.0 95.8 87644100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.1, Target = 92.3CPI = 89.1, Target = 92.3CPI = 89.1, Target = 92.3 86.8 87.7 89.1 1.4 92.3 93.4 8024175On Target
High needsCPI = 76.1, Target = 82.1CPI = 76.1, Target = 82.1CPI = 76.1, Target = 82.1 69.3 73.4 76.1 2.7 82.1 84.7 774650Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------16--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 72.6, Target = 80.7CPI = 72.6, Target = 80.7CPI = 72.6, Target = 80.7 66.9 72.2 72.6 0.4 80.7 83.5 813150Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.6, Target = 92.4CPI = 88.6, Target = 92.4CPI = 88.6, Target = 92.4 86.9 87.8 88.6 0.8 92.4 93.5 6822950Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 22.5 13.16880 2.2 2.66880
High needs 9.6 2.71500 8.9 10.01500
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.3 5.7530 2.0 7.5530
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities 5.2 1.01030 12.4 13.61030
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--24---24-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.2 12.36420 2.3 2.56420
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 32.2 46.269025 3.2 1.769025
High needs 11.0 18.715025 11.0 7.315025
Econ. Disadvantaged 22.0 30.25325 6.0 5.7530
EL and Former EL--8---8-
Students w/ disabilities 3.1 9.710325 13.4 9.710325
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--1---1-
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--24---24-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 30.9 45.864425 3.3 1.964425
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 17.1 23.224125 1.3 2.92410
High needs 6.5 13.04625 4.3 15.2460
Econ. Disadvantaged--16---16-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities 5.6 12.93125 2.8 16.1310
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 16.2 22.722925 0.9 3.12290
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51SGP = 47, Target = 51 58.0 47.0 -11.0 51.0No43850Below Target
High needsSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 50.5 39.0 -11.5 51.0No9525Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-32--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51SGP = 38, Target = 51 47.0 38.0 -9.0 51.0No6625Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-7--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 58.0 46.0 -12.0 51.0No40750Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51SGP = 68, Target = 51 61.0 68.0 7.0 51.0Yes441100Above Target
High needsSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 53.0 62.0 9.0 51.0Yes97100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-34--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 53.0 58.0 5.0 51.0Yes6775On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-7--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-18--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 66.5, Target = 51SGP = 66.5, Target = 51SGP = 66.5, Target = 51 61.0 66.5 5.5 51.0Yes410100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.02-
High needs- 60.02-
EL and Former EL- 60.02-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students71169598Yes71169798Yes24524399Yes
High needs15615197Yes15615197Yes484798Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged555498Yes555498Yes17---
EL and Former EL8---8---4---
Students w/ disabilities10710396Yes10710396Yes323197Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.1---1-------
Asian10---10---2---
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino11---11---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.24---24---8---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White66564998Yes66565198Yes232231100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles