Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Greenmont Avenue

District not selectedDistricts School selectedSchools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Greenmont Avenue

Organization Information
District:Dracut (00790000)School type:Elementary School
School:Greenmont Avenue (00790030)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.8, Target = 91 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 84.8, Target = 91 75 or Higher All Students 84.6 87.1 84.8 -2.3 91.0 92.3 4612725No Change
High needsCPI = 76.2, Target = 83.7 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 76.2, Target = 83.7 75 or Higher High needs 72.1 76.9 76.2 -0.7 83.7 86.1 526325No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 79.5, Target = 82.3 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 79.5, Target = 82.3 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 80.7 80.7 79.5 -1.2 82.3 90.4 634425No Change
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilities  66.7---- 83.4-26--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.8, Target = 91.6 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 83.8, Target = 91.6 75 or Higher White 85.6 88.1 83.8 -4.3 91.6 92.8 271020Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 81.9, Target = 91.5 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 81.9, Target = 91.5 75 or Higher All Students 85.4 84.6 81.9 -2.7 91.5 92.7 331260Declined
High needsCPI = 73, Target = 80.2 - High needs75 or Higher High needsHigh needs CPI = 73, Target = 80.2 75 or Higher High needs 66.0 72.7 73.0 0.3 80.2 83.0 376250Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 75, Target = 80.3 - Econ. Disadvantaged75 or Higher Econ. DisadvantagedEcon. Disadvantaged CPI = 75, Target = 80.3 75 or Higher Econ. Disadvantaged 78.5 78.5 75.0 -3.5 80.3 89.3 43440Declined
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilities  64.3---- 82.2-25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------8--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 81.9, Target = 91.4 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 81.9, Target = 91.4 75 or Higher White 85.3 85.8 81.9 -3.9 91.4 92.7 201010Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.3, Target = 86.7 - All Students75 or Higher All StudentsAll Students CPI = 85.3, Target = 86.7 75 or Higher All Students 85.5 85.5 85.3 -0.2 86.7 92.8 653925No Change
High needs -------18--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------14--
EL and Former EL -------4--
Students w/ disabilities -------5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 86.7, Target = 90.7 - White75 or Higher WhiteWhite CPI = 86.7, Target = 90.7 75 or Higher White 89.8 89.8 86.7 -3.1 90.7 94.9 58320Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 13.6 10.21270 5.3 7.11270
High needs 7.5 3.2630 9.4 14.3630
Econ. Disadvantaged 8.6 4.5440 5.7 11.4440
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities--26---26-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 15.2 10.81020 4.8 7.81020
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 24.1 25.41260 8.3 11.91260
High needs 18.5 16.1620 20.4 22.6620
Econ. Disadvantaged 25.0 13.6440 16.7 15.9440
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities--25---25-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--8---8-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--10---10-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 25.5 26.71010 8.5 11.91010
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 8.8 23.13925 5.3 0.03925
High needs--18---18-
Econ. Disadvantaged--14---14-
EL and Former EL--4---4-
Students w/ disabilities--5---5-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--3---3-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 9.1 28.13225 2.3 0.03225
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53.5, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 50.0 53.5 3.5 51.0No7675On Target
High needsSGP = 51, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 51, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 41.0 51.0 10.0 51.0Yes3675On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-25--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-3--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 55.5, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 5175 or Higher White 50.5 55.5 5.0 51.0No6475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 75, Target = 51 - All StudentsAll Students-SGP = 75, Target = 51SGP = 75, Target = 5175 or Higher All Students 66.0 75.0 9.0 51.0No77100Above Target
High needsSGP = 67, Target = 51 - High needsHigh needs-SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 5175 or Higher High needs 52.0 67.0 15.0 51.0No37100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-25--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-4--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-17--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-4--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 75, Target = 51 - WhiteWhite-SGP = 75, Target = 51SGP = 75, Target = 5175 or Higher White 68.5 75.0 6.5 51.0No64100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.05.00-
High needs- 60.05.00-
EL and Former EL- 60.05.00-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students130130100Yes13012999Yes4040100Yes
High needs6666100Yes666598Yes19---
Econ. Disadvantaged4747100Yes4747100Yes15---
EL and Former EL7---7---4---
Students w/ disabilities2828100Yes282796Yes5---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian8---8---3---
Afr. Amer./Black4---4-------
Hispanic/Latino10---10---3---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White105105100Yes10510499Yes3333100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.


School and District Profiles