Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Douglas High School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Douglas High School
Organization Information
District:Douglas (00770000)School type:High School
School:Douglas High School (00770505)Grades served:09,10,11,12
Region:CentralTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 96.3, Target = 97.3CPI = 96.3, Target = 97.3 96.8 99.5 96.3 -3.2 97.3 98.4 288875On Target
High needsCPI = 88, Target = 92.5CPI = 88, Target = 92.5CPI = 88, Target = 92.5 91.0- 88.0 -3.0 92.5 95.5 12270Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------12--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 96.3, Target = 97.4CPI = 96.3, Target = 97.4CPI = 96.3, Target = 97.4 96.9 99.5 96.3 -3.2 97.4 98.5 148775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.6, Target = 90.5CPI = 88.6, Target = 90.5CPI = 88.6, Target = 90.5 88.6 88.3 88.6 0.3 90.5 94.3 338850Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 70.4, Target = 81.4CPI = 70.4, Target = 81.4CPI = 70.4, Target = 81.4 77.7- 70.4 -7.3 81.4 88.9 11270Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------12--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------19--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.5, Target = 91CPI = 88.5, Target = 91CPI = 88.5, Target = 91 89.2 87.8 88.5 0.7 91.0 94.6 168750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.7, Target = 90.4CPI = 88.7, Target = 90.4CPI = 88.7, Target = 90.4 88.5 92.8 88.7 -4.1 90.4 94.3 32840Declined
High needs -------24--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------10--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.6, Target = 91.3CPI = 88.6, Target = 91.3CPI = 88.6, Target = 91.3 89.6 92.7 88.6 -4.1 91.3 94.8 15830Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 61.5 45.5880 0.0 1.1880
High needs 8.3 18.52725 2.8 3.7270
Econ. Disadvantaged--12---12-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--19---19-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 61.6 46.0870 0.0 1.1870
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 44.8 46.6880 3.8 4.5880
High needs 8.1 18.52725 10.8 14.8270
Econ. Disadvantaged--12---12-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--19---19-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 46.0 47.1870 4.0 4.6870
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 34.0 17.9840 0.0 4.8840
High needs--24---24-
Econ. Disadvantaged--10---10-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--18---18-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 35.4 16.9830 0.0 4.8830
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 66.0 53.0 -13.0 51.0No8775On Target
High needsSGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51SGP = 36, Target = 51 49.5 36.0 -13.5 51.0No2625Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-11--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 66.0 53.0 -13.0 51.0No8675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 35.5 40.0 4.5 51.0Yes8775On Target
High needsSGP = 40.5, Target = 51SGP = 40.5, Target = 51SGP = 40.5, Target = 51 40.0 40.5 0.5 51.0No2650Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-11--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51SGP = 40, Target = 51 36.0 40.0 4.0 51.0Yes8675On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01-
High needs- 60.01-
EL and Former EL- 60.01-
Summary > 2016
2015 4-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 93.5, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.5, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 93.5, Target = 80 92.9 93.5 0.6 80.0 90.010775On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 87.5, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 87.5, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 87.5, Target = 80 84.8 87.5 2.7 80.0 90.04075On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 80.0 90.0---
EL and Former EL --- 80.0 90.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 80.0 90.020--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 80.0 90.0---
Asian --- 80.0 90.01--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 80.0 90.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 80.0 90.01--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 80.0 90.01--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 80.0 90.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 94.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.2, Target = 80Cohort Graduation Rate = 94.2, Target = 80 92.7 94.2 1.5 80.0 90.010475On Target
Summary > 2016
2014 5-Year Cohort Graduation Rate
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2013 Rate 2014 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCohort Graduation Rate = 92.9, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.9, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.9, Target = 85 87.1 92.9 5.8 85.0 95.012675On Target
High needsCohort Graduation Rate = 84.8, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 84.8, Target = 85 71.9 84.8 12.9 85.0 95.03350Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 85.0 95.0---
EL and Former EL --- 85.0 95.0---
Students w/ disabilities --- 85.0 95.018--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 85.0 95.0---
Asian --- 85.0 95.01--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 85.0 95.0---
Hispanic/Latino --- 85.0 95.0---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 85.0 95.01--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 85.0 95.0---
WhiteCohort Graduation Rate = 92.7, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.7, Target = 85Cohort Graduation Rate = 92.7, Target = 85 87.6 92.7 5.1 85.0 95.012475On Target
Summary > 2016
2015 Annual Dropout Rate
  0  2  4  6  8  10 12  14 16  18 20 Baseline Rate 2014 Rate 2015 Rate Change Annual Target 6 Year Goal Dropout Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsDropout Rate = 0.5, Target = 1.8 2.2 1.3 0.5 0.8 1.8 1.17140975On Target
High needsDropout Rate = 0.9, Target = 4.9 5.9 1.5 0.9 0.6 4.9 3.072110100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------45--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------76--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteDropout Rate = 0.5, Target = 1.8 2.1 1.1 0.5 0.6 1.8 1.16139675On Target
Extra Credit for Reengaging Dropouts (2 or more)
  2015 Number of Dropouts Reengaged PPI Points
All students--
High needs--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students8989100Yes9191100Yes9090100Yes
High needs2828100Yes3030100Yes29---
Econ. Disadvantaged12---12---12---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities20---22---21---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino1---1---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.------------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White8888100Yes9090100Yes8989100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles