Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Douglas Middle School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Douglas Middle School

Organization Information
District:Douglas (00770000)School type:Middle School
School:Douglas Middle School (00770305)Grades served:06,07,08
Region:CentralTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.7, Target = 91.6CPI = 90.7, Target = 91.6 88.8 87.4 90.7 3.3 91.6 94.4 5239775On Target
High needsCPI = 80.2, Target = 81.3CPI = 80.2, Target = 81.3CPI = 80.2, Target = 81.3 75.0 70.0 80.2 10.2 81.3 87.5 4810575On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 85.4, Target = 82CPI = 85.4, Target = 82CPI = 85.4, Target = 82 80.4 80.4 85.4 5.0 82.0 90.2 5860100Above Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 70.1, Target = 76.5CPI = 70.1, Target = 76.5CPI = 70.1, Target = 76.5 68.6 59.6 70.1 10.5 76.5 84.3 526150Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------3--
WhiteCPI = 90.9, Target = 91.7CPI = 90.9, Target = 91.7 88.9 87.5 90.9 3.4 91.7 94.5 4137075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.6, Target = 84.8CPI = 80.6, Target = 84.8CPI = 80.6, Target = 84.8 79.7 74.9 80.6 5.7 84.8 89.9 5439750Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 63, Target = 70.4CPI = 63, Target = 70.4CPI = 63, Target = 70.4 60.5 55.7 63.0 7.3 70.4 80.3 5010650Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 68.9, Target = 70CPI = 68.9, Target = 70CPI = 68.9, Target = 70 67.3 67.3 68.9 1.6 70.0 83.7 536175On Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 51.2, Target = 62.5CPI = 51.2, Target = 62.5CPI = 51.2, Target = 62.5 50.0 42.9 51.2 8.3 62.5 75.0 536150Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------5--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------3--
WhiteCPI = 80.6, Target = 84.8CPI = 80.6, Target = 84.8CPI = 80.6, Target = 84.8 79.7 75.1 80.6 5.5 84.8 89.9 4537050Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 74.3, Target = 79.3CPI = 74.3, Target = 79.3CPI = 74.3, Target = 79.3 77.4 77.4 74.3 -3.1 79.3 88.7 461440Declined
High needsCPI = 64.5, Target = 63.2CPI = 64.5, Target = 63.2CPI = 64.5, Target = 63.2 59.8 59.8 64.5 4.7 63.2 79.9 6938100Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------19--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 74.6, Target = 79.1CPI = 74.6, Target = 79.1CPI = 74.6, Target = 79.1 77.2 77.2 74.6 -2.6 79.1 88.6 331340Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 10.0 16.939725 5.5 4.839725
High needs 0.9 7.610525 17.9 11.410525
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.8 10.06025 10.7 10.0600
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 3.36125 25.0 18.06125
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--3---3-
White 9.4 15.937025 5.5 4.937025
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 10.7 19.639725 17.7 13.439725
High needs 4.8 7.510625 40.0 32.110625
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.5 9.86125 25.5 23.0610
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 3.3 3.3610 56.7 47.56125
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--5---5-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--3---3-
White 11.0 19.237025 17.0 12.737025
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 2.4 4.214425 12.1 12.51440
High needs 3.6 0.0380 35.7 23.73825
Econ. Disadvantaged--19---19-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 2.4 3.713425 12.2 11.21340
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 45.0 51.0 6.0 51.0Yes38475On Target
High needsSGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51SGP = 57, Target = 51 38.5 57.0 18.5 51.0Yes97100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 38.5 51.0 12.5 51.0Yes5775On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51SGP = 61, Target = 51 35.5 61.0 25.5 51.0Yes53100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-3--
WhiteSGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51SGP = 49.5, Target = 51 45.0 49.5 4.5 51.0Yes35875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 42.0 58.0 16.0 51.0Yes383100Above Target
High needsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 44.0 49.0 5.0 51.0Yes9875On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51 42.0 53.5 11.5 51.0No5875On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 50.5 45.0 -5.5 51.0No5350Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-5--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-3--
WhiteSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 42.5 58.0 15.5 51.0Yes358100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students406404100Yes406404100Yes14814799Yes
High needs10710699Yes107107100Yes3939100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged616098Yes6161100Yes19---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities6262100Yes6262100Yes2222100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian7---7---3---
Afr. Amer./Black3---3-------
Hispanic/Latino8---8---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.8---8---4---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.3---3---1---
White37737599Yes37737599Yes13813799Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles