Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Deer Hill
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Deer Hill
Organization Information
District:Cohasset (00650000)School type:Elementary School
School:Deer Hill (00650005)Grades served:03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.4, Target = 94.7CPI = 92.4, Target = 94.7CPI = 92.4, Target = 94.7 90.9 93.4 92.4 -1.0 94.7 95.5 8138575On Target
High needsCPI = 80.4, Target = 83.4CPI = 80.4, Target = 83.4CPI = 80.4, Target = 83.4 71.5 85.3 80.4 -4.9 83.4 85.8 72560Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 90, Target = 94CPI = 90, Target = 94CPI = 90, Target = 94 93.5 93.5 90.0 -3.5 94.0 96.8 962575On Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 73.5, Target = 82.7CPI = 73.5, Target = 82.7CPI = 73.5, Target = 82.7 70.3 78.8 73.5 -5.3 82.7 85.2 74340Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.9, Target = 95.2CPI = 92.9, Target = 95.2CPI = 92.9, Target = 95.2 91.8 93.7 92.9 -0.8 95.2 95.9 7836075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.2, Target = 95.5CPI = 90.2, Target = 95.5CPI = 90.2, Target = 95.5 92.3 90.4 90.2 -0.2 95.5 96.2 7238625No Change
High needsCPI = 76.3, Target = 86.9CPI = 76.3, Target = 86.9CPI = 76.3, Target = 86.9 77.6 76.6 76.3 -0.3 86.9 88.8 525625No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 84, Target = 85.6CPI = 84, Target = 85.6CPI = 84, Target = 85.6 84.3 84.3 84.0 -0.3 85.6 92.2 812525No Change
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 69.9, Target = 86.5CPI = 69.9, Target = 86.5CPI = 69.9, Target = 86.5 76.9 70.5 69.9 -0.6 86.5 88.5 653425No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./Black -------9--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.1, Target = 96CPI = 91.1, Target = 96CPI = 91.1, Target = 96 93.2 91.3 91.1 -0.2 96.0 96.6 7036125No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.4, Target = 95.8CPI = 87.4, Target = 95.8CPI = 87.4, Target = 95.8 92.8 88.7 87.4 -1.3 95.8 96.4 7313925No Change
High needsCPI = 76.3, Target = 75.4CPI = 76.3, Target = 75.4 63.1 82.7 76.3 -6.4 75.4 81.6 782075On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------12--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.9, Target = 96.3CPI = 87.9, Target = 96.3CPI = 87.9, Target = 96.3 93.7 88.6 87.9 -0.7 96.3 96.9 6413025No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 19.8 18.23850 1.8 2.33850
High needs 7.9 7.1560 6.3 10.7560
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.8 12.0250 0.0 4.0250
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 2.6 2.93425 10.3 14.7340
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black--9---9-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 19.7 18.33600 1.9 2.23600
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 40.0 35.83860 4.1 4.13860
High needs 17.5 16.1560 15.9 16.1560
Econ. Disadvantaged 18.5 20.0250 7.4 4.02525
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 15.4 14.7340 23.1 23.5340
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black--9---9-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 41.7 36.63610 3.3 3.33610
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 16.2 28.113925 2.1 3.61390
High needs 7.7 15.02025 7.7 15.0200
Econ. Disadvantaged--12---12-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 16.3 27.713025 1.6 3.81300
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 59.0 60.0 1.0 51.0No247100Above Target
High needsSGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51 46.5 53.5 7.0 51.0No3875On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-16--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-6--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-6--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51SGP = 60, Target = 51 59.0 60.0 1.0 51.0No232100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51 59.0 55.5 -3.5 51.0No24875On Target
High needsSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 44.0 55.0 11.0 51.0No3975On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-17--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-6--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-6--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 60.0 55.0 -5.0 51.0No23375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students39239099Yes395394100Yes14314299Yes
High needs5858100Yes5858100Yes2121100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged2727100Yes2727100Yes13---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities3434100Yes3434100Yes10---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian10---10---4---
Afr. Amer./Black9---9---3---
Hispanic/Latino2---2---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.5---5---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White36636499Yes368367100Yes13413399Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles