Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Streiber Memorial School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Streiber Memorial School
Organization Information
District:Chicopee (00610000)School type:Elementary School
School:Streiber Memorial School (00610065)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Berkshires +Title I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.2, Target = 86.8CPI = 88.2, Target = 86.8CPI = 88.2, Target = 86.8 77.4 84.0 88.2 4.2 86.8 88.7 62133100Above Target
High needsCPI = 80, Target = 84.1CPI = 80, Target = 84.1CPI = 80, Target = 84.1 72.7 72.3 80.0 7.7 84.1 86.4 706550Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 80.5, Target = 79.4CPI = 80.5, Target = 79.4CPI = 80.5, Target = 79.4 77.5 77.5 80.5 3.0 79.4 88.8 695075On Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 71, Target = 77.1CPI = 71, Target = 77.1CPI = 71, Target = 77.1 60.7 50.0 71.0 21.0 77.1 80.4 673150Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------24--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 90.5, Target = 88.2CPI = 90.5, Target = 88.2CPI = 90.5, Target = 88.2 79.8 86.7 90.5 3.8 88.2 89.9 6497100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90, Target = 88.6CPI = 90, Target = 88.6CPI = 90, Target = 88.6 80.5 83.5 90.0 6.5 88.6 90.3 70132100Above Target
High needsCPI = 82, Target = 84.5CPI = 82, Target = 84.5CPI = 82, Target = 84.5 73.4 72.3 82.0 9.7 84.5 86.7 756450Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83.7, Target = 78CPI = 83.7, Target = 78CPI = 83.7, Target = 78 76.0 76.0 83.7 7.7 78.0 88.0 8049100Above Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 72.5, Target = 70.8CPI = 72.5, Target = 70.8CPI = 72.5, Target = 70.8 50.0 55.2 72.5 17.3 70.8 75.0 7130100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------4--
Hispanic/Latino -------23--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91.5, Target = 91.6CPI = 91.5, Target = 91.6 85.6 86.0 91.5 5.5 91.6 92.8 729775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.4, Target = 85.4CPI = 80.4, Target = 85.4CPI = 80.4, Target = 85.4 75.0 75.6 80.4 4.8 85.4 87.5 484650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 72.9, Target = 81.3CPI = 72.9, Target = 81.3CPI = 72.9, Target = 81.3 68.0 63.5 72.9 9.4 81.3 84.0 682450Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------20--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.2, Target = 86.3CPI = 84.2, Target = 86.3CPI = 84.2, Target = 86.3 76.5 77.3 84.2 6.9 86.3 88.3 463850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 10.0 9.01330 10.8 5.313325
High needs 3.1 3.1650 21.5 10.86525
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.0 2.0500 16.0 10.05025
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 3.23125 48.3 22.63125
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--24---24-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 11.2 8.2970 6.1 2.19725
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 26.2 37.113225 10.0 6.113225
High needs 13.8 23.46425 18.5 12.56425
Econ. Disadvantaged 18.0 22.44925 20.0 10.24925
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 16.73025 34.5 26.73025
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--4---4-
Hispanic/Latino--23---23-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 24.5 36.19725 7.1 3.19725
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 4.4 15.24625 13.3 8.74625
High needs 0.0 12.52425 23.1 16.72425
Econ. Disadvantaged--20---20-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--6---6-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 6.1 13.23825 9.1 2.63825
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51 61.5 44.5 -17.0 51.0Yes8075On Target
High needsSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 51.0 44.0 -7.0 51.0Yes3875On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 58.5 41.0 -17.5 51.0No3050Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 62.0 45.0 -17.0 51.0No6150Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51SGP = 46.5, Target = 51 70.0 46.5 -23.5 51.0Yes8075On Target
High needsSGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51 69.5 42.5 -27.0 51.0Yes3875On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 41.5, Target = 51SGP = 41.5, Target = 51SGP = 41.5, Target = 51 68.0 41.5 -26.5 51.0Yes3075On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-12--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 69.5 43.0 -26.5 51.0Yes6175On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students14214099Yes14213998Yes5050100Yes
High needs7070100Yes706999Yes2727100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged5454100Yes545398Yes22---
EL and Former EL1---1---1---
Students w/ disabilities3434100Yes343397Yes12---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian4---4---1---
Afr. Amer./Black5---5-------
Hispanic/Latino26---26---7---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.4---4---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White10310198Yes10310198Yes4141100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles