Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Bowie
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Bowie
Organization Information
District:Chicopee (00610000)School type:Elementary School
School:Bowie (00610020)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Berkshires +Title I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.3, Target = 89.7CPI = 87.3, Target = 89.7CPI = 87.3, Target = 89.7 82.4 88.6 87.3 -1.3 89.7 91.2 5817125No Change
High needsCPI = 80.9, Target = 86.5CPI = 80.9, Target = 86.5CPI = 80.9, Target = 86.5 76.9 84.0 80.9 -3.1 86.5 88.5 73720Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 82.7, Target = 87.2CPI = 82.7, Target = 87.2CPI = 82.7, Target = 87.2 86.0 86.0 82.7 -3.3 87.2 93.0 78620Declined
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 83.9, Target = 75.7CPI = 83.9, Target = 75.7CPI = 83.9, Target = 75.7 63.5 90.2 83.9 -6.3 75.7 81.8 8931100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.6, Target = 90.6CPI = 88.6, Target = 90.6CPI = 88.6, Target = 90.6 83.8 88.6 88.6 0.0 90.6 91.9 5212925No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 83.9, Target = 83.6CPI = 83.9, Target = 83.6 71.9 80.6 83.9 3.3 83.6 86.0 4317175On Target
High needsCPI = 75.3, Target = 79.3CPI = 75.3, Target = 79.3CPI = 75.3, Target = 79.3 64.5 71.5 75.3 3.8 79.3 82.3 487250Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 77.4, Target = 76.4CPI = 77.4, Target = 76.4 74.3 74.3 77.4 3.1 76.4 87.2 536275On Target
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 83.1, Target = 67.3CPI = 83.1, Target = 67.3CPI = 83.1, Target = 67.3 51.0 81.8 83.1 1.3 67.3 75.5 8231100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------7--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 84.9, Target = 84.6CPI = 84.9, Target = 84.6 73.6 80.4 84.9 4.5 84.6 86.8 3312975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 81, Target = 83.8CPI = 81, Target = 83.8CPI = 81, Target = 83.8 72.3 80.8 81.0 0.2 83.8 86.2 505450Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 69, Target = 85.4CPI = 69, Target = 85.4CPI = 69, Target = 85.4 75.0- 69.0 1.0 85.4 87.5 542550Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------23--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85, Target = 84.8CPI = 85, Target = 84.8 74.0 80.0 85.0 5.0 84.8 87.0 514075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 7.9 11.717125 3.0 4.11710
High needs 3.8 5.67225 6.4 6.9720
Econ. Disadvantaged 4.4 6.56225 5.9 4.86225
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino 6.1 9.73125 3.0 3.2310
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 9.1 13.212925 3.3 4.71290
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 23.0 29.217125 11.5 10.51710
High needs 10.3 16.77225 21.8 19.47225
Econ. Disadvantaged 10.3 19.46225 19.1 16.16225
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--21---21-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino 12.1 16.13125 9.1 16.1310
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--7---7-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 27.3 32.612925 12.4 9.312925
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 7.7 14.85425 7.7 9.3540
High needs 7.0 8.02525 16.3 20.0250
Econ. Disadvantaged--23---23-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 8.9 20.04025 8.9 7.54025
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 47.5 44.0 -3.5 51.0No10550Below Target
High needsSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 52.5 34.0 -18.5 51.0No4525Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51SGP = 34.5, Target = 51 56.0 34.5 -21.5 51.0No4025Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-22--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 47.0 49.0 2.0 51.0No7550Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 49.0 55.0 6.0 51.0Yes10675On Target
High needsSGP = 52.5, Target = 51SGP = 52.5, Target = 51SGP = 52.5, Target = 51 39.0 52.5 13.5 51.0Yes4675On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 38.0 52.0 14.0 51.0Yes4175On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-3--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-23--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 47.5 55.0 7.5 51.0Yes7575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01-
High needs- 60.01-
EL and Former EL- 60.01-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students174174100Yes174174100Yes5555100Yes
High needs7575100Yes7575100Yes2626100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged6565100Yes6565100Yes24---
EL and Former EL------------
Students w/ disabilities21---21---10---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1-------
Afr. Amer./Black3---3---1---
Hispanic/Latino3131100Yes3131100Yes11---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.7---7---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White132132100Yes132132100Yes4141100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles