Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Frank M Sokolowski Elementary

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Frank M Sokolowski Elementary

Organization Information
District:Chelsea (00570000)School type:Elementary School
School:Frank M Sokolowski Elementary (00570040)Grades served:01,02,03,04
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 3
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 65, Target = 84.7CPI = 65, Target = 84.7CPI = 65, Target = 84.7 73.8 61.1 65.0 3.9 84.7 86.9 529350Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 62.2, Target = 84.4CPI = 62.2, Target = 84.4CPI = 62.2, Target = 84.4 73.3 58.1 62.2 4.1 84.4 86.7 724050Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 65.5, Target = 63.7CPI = 65.5, Target = 63.7CPI = 65.5, Target = 63.7 60.4 60.4 65.5 5.1 63.7 80.2 11198100Above Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 51.2, Target = 74.7CPI = 51.2, Target = 74.7CPI = 51.2, Target = 74.7 56.6 47.6 51.2 3.6 74.7 78.3 410350Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities  66.1---- 83.1-39--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------14--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 63.9, Target = 85.2CPI = 63.9, Target = 85.2CPI = 63.9, Target = 85.2 74.7 60.5 63.9 3.4 85.2 87.4 1724750Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 67.6, Target = 87.5CPI = 67.6, Target = 87.5CPI = 67.6, Target = 87.5 78.6 65.4 67.6 2.2 87.5 89.3 32750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 76.6, Target = 86.6CPI = 76.6, Target = 86.6CPI = 76.6, Target = 86.6 77.1 74.9 76.6 1.7 86.6 88.6 1929450Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 74.4, Target = 86.5CPI = 74.4, Target = 86.5CPI = 74.4, Target = 86.5 76.8 72.8 74.4 1.6 86.5 88.4 4424150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 75.8, Target = 76.2CPI = 75.8, Target = 76.2 74.0 74.0 75.8 1.8 76.2 87.0 4719875On Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 68.5, Target = 81.6CPI = 68.5, Target = 81.6CPI = 68.5, Target = 81.6 68.4 69.3 68.5 -0.8 81.6 84.2 3310425No Change
Students w/ disabilities  69.6---- 84.8-39--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------14--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 75.9, Target = 87.3CPI = 75.9, Target = 87.3CPI = 75.9, Target = 87.3 78.2 75.3 75.9 0.6 87.3 89.1 5924850Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 75.9, Target = 91CPI = 75.9, Target = 91CPI = 75.9, Target = 91 84.5 67.0 75.9 8.9 91.0 92.3 82750Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All students ----------
High needs ----------
Econ. Disadvantaged ----------
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities ----------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino ----------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White ----------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 1.5 2.029325 23.5 21.82930
High needs 1.0 1.724025 26.0 25.42400
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.2 1.519825 21.8 20.71980
EL and Former EL 0.0 1.010325 38.1 38.81030
Students w/ disabilities--39---39-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--14---14-
Hispanic/Latino 1.3 1.22470 23.7 22.72470
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 0.0 7.42725 23.1 25.9270
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 10.0 15.329425 11.8 13.32940
High needs 8.2 14.524125 12.1 15.82410
Econ. Disadvantaged 8.8 13.119825 12.4 13.11980
EL and Former EL 4.8 17.310425 16.7 22.11040
Students w/ disabilities--39---39-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--14---14-
Hispanic/Latino 9.8 15.324825 10.7 13.72480
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 12.0 14.82725 24.0 18.52725
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students--------
High needs--------
Econ. Disadvantaged--------
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--------
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--------
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--------
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 38.5 53.0 14.5 51.0No132100Above Target
High needsSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 35.0 51.0 16.0 51.0No105100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 33.0 52.0 19.0 51.0No92100Above Target
EL and Former ELSGP = 50.5, Target = 51SGP = 50.5, Target = 51 53.5 50.5 -3.0 51.0No4075On Target
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 39.0 53.0 14.0 51.0No11075On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-12--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51 55.0 54.5 -0.5 51.0Yes13275On Target
High needsSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 55.0 55.0 0.0 51.0Yes10575On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 55.0 56.0 1.0 51.0Yes9375On Target
EL and Former ELSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 46.0 37.0 -9.0 51.0No3925Below Target
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-13--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-8--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51 56.0 53.5 -2.5 51.0Yes11075On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-12--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 70.0 60.013625
High needs 70.0 60.013625
EL and Former EL 70.0 60.013625
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students36035498Yes361361100Yes----
High needs30529998Yes306306100Yes----
Econ. Disadvantaged23322998Yes233233100Yes----
EL and Former EL16215696Yes163163100Yes----
Students w/ disabilities424095Yes4242100Yes----
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian3---3-------
Afr. Amer./Black15---15-------
Hispanic/Latino31130799Yes312312100Yes----
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.3---3-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White2828100Yes2828100Yes----

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles