Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Carlisle School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Carlisle School

Organization Information

District:

Carlisle (00510000)

School type:

Elementary-Middle School

School:

Carlisle School (00510025)

Grades served:

PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Title I School (TA)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		95.3	95.9	96.7	0.8	97.3	97.7	98	400	100	Above Target
High needs		84.5	84.6	85.4	0.8	91.0	92.3	88	77	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		84.1	80.6	80.9	0.3	90.7	92.1	91	59	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		98.8	99.0	98.9	-0.1	99.3	99.4	91	47	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		97.9	98.0	93.4	-4.6	98.6	99.0	43	38	75	On Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		95.3	95.4	96.9	1.5	97.3	97.7	93	300	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		93.3	94.7	96.9	2.2	96.1	96.7	98	398	100	Above Target
High needs		74.4	81.6	88.0	6.4	85.1	87.2	95	77	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		71.3	77.1	84.3	7.2	83.3	85.7	99	59	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		99.4	98.5	99.5	1.0	99.7	99.7	94	47	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	5	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		100.0	98.7	99.3	0.6	100.0	100.0	92	38	100	Above Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		92.9	93.9	96.3	2.4	95.9	96.5	94	298	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		88.6	95.1	94.0	-1.1	93.4	94.3	98	153	100	Above Target
High needs		66.4	87.1	79.0	-8.1	80.4	83.2	90	31	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	6	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		63.8	86.5	72.7	-13.8	78.9	81.9	93	22	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		95.7	-	-	-	-	97.9	-	24	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		87.9	94.0	93.4	-0.6	92.9	94.0	93	113	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	34.3	41.0	400	25	1.8	1.3	400	25
High needs	9.0	19.5	77	25	9.0	6.5	77	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Students w/ disabilities	7.0	6.8	59	0	11.3	8.5	59	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	46.0	48.9	47	0	0.0	0.0	47	25
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	36.8	36.8	38	0	0.0	2.6	38	0
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	31.5	39.3	300	25	2.4	1.3	300	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	57.7	67.6	398	25	2.7	1.0	398	25
High needs	29.7	32.5	77	0	11.0	5.2	77	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Students w/ disabilities	23.3	20.3	59	0	13.7	6.8	59	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	78.0	89.4	47	25	0.0	0.0	47	25
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	5	-	-	-	5	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	74.4	76.3	38	0	0.0	0.0	38	25
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	52.6	63.1	298	25	3.3	1.3	298	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	27.8	35.9	153	25	1.9	1.3	153	25
High needs	9.7	12.9	31	25	3.2	6.5	31	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	6	-	-	-	6	-
Students w/ disabilities	11.5	4.5	22	0	3.8	9.1	22	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	24	-	-	-	24	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	24.2	32.7	113	25	2.4	0.9	113	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		65.0	60.0	-5.0	51.0	Yes	323	100	Above Target
High needs		58.0	59.0	1.0	51.0	No	59	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		54.0	53.0	-1.0	51.0	No	46	75	On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		67.5	59.0	-8.5	51.0	No	39	75	On Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	31	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		65.0	60.0	-5.0	51.0	Yes	241	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		64.0	72.0	8.0	51.0	Yes	320	100	Above Target
High needs		65.5	64.0	-1.5	51.0	Yes	59	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	9	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		62.5	69.0	6.5	51.0	Yes	46	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		70.0	79.0	9.0	51.0	Yes	39	100	Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		60.0	66.0	6.0	51.0	No	31	100	Above Target
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		64.0	72.0	8.0	51.0	Yes	238	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	6.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	6.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	6.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	421	401	95	Yes	421	399	95	Yes	154	153	99	Yes
High needs	83	78	96	Yes	83	78	97	Yes	32	31	97	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	14	-	-	-	14	-	-	-	7	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	64	59	94	No	64	59	96	Yes	23	22	96	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	47	47	100	Yes	47	47	100	Yes	24	24	100	Yes
Afr. Amer./Black	5	-	-	-	5	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	11	-	-	-	11	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	39	38	97	Yes	39	38	97	Yes	10	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	319	301	95	Yes	319	299	95	Yes	114	113	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.