Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Dean S Luce

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Dean S Luce

Organization Information

District:

Canton (00500000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Dean S Luce (00500020)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Greater Boston

Title I status:

Title I School (TA)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 2

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		92.5	85.7	90.0	4.3	95.6	96.3	70	249	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		79.3	72.3	81.8	9.5	87.9	89.7	77	84	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		72.5	72.5	78.8	6.3	74.8	86.3	59	59	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		74.3	62.5	70.8	8.3	85.0	87.2	67	36	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		80.4	72.5	75.0	2.5	86.9	90.2	52	26	50	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		93.5	87.8	92.4	4.6	96.2	96.8	75	174	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		84.7	83.6	88.8	5.2	91.1	92.4	65	247	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		65.9	66.8	76.8	10.0	80.1	83.0	54	82	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		64.7	64.7	73.7	9.0	67.6	82.4	40	58	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		60.3	54.7	63.6	8.9	76.8	80.2	47	35	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	23	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		63.0	68.3	71.2	2.9	75.3	81.5	50	26	50	Improved Below Target
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		86.6	86.1	91.1	5.0	92.2	93.3	70	172	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		86.2	81.6	79.2	-2.4	92.0	93.1	44	90	25	No Change
High needs		70.0	62.9	66.7	3.8	82.5	85.0	46	39	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	26	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	20	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
White		89.3	82.0	81.1	-0.9	93.8	94.7	31	70	25	No Change

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	14.9	19.7	249	25	5.9	3.2	249	25
High needs	4.0	7.1	84	25	15.8	7.1	84	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	2.0	6.8	59	25	15.7	8.5	59	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Students w/ disabilities	1.7	5.6	36	25	24.1	16.7	36	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Afr. Amer./Black	3.3	7.7	26	25	16.7	7.7	26	25
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	15.0	20.1	174	25	3.7	2.3	174	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	29.0	44.1	247	25	8.9	4.5	247	25
High needs	8.9	19.5	82	25	22.8	12.2	82	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	9.8	19.0	58	25	25.5	15.5	58	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Students w/ disabilities	3.4	5.7	35	25	36.2	20.0	35	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	23	-	-	-	23	-
Afr. Amer./Black	20.0	19.2	26	0	20.0	23.1	26	0
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	27.8	45.9	172	25	7.0	2.3	172	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	17.2	15.6	90	0	7.1	6.7	90	0
High needs	3.2	2.6	39	0	22.6	15.4	39	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	26	-	-	-	26	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	20	-	-	-	20	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
White	14.7	17.1	70	25	5.9	4.3	70	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		51.0	52.5	1.5	51.0	Yes	162	75	On Target
High needs		39.0	52.5	13.5	51.0	Yes	60	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		39.0	47.0	8.0	51.0	Yes	42	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		30.0	53.0	23.0	51.0	Yes	29	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	20	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
White		54.0	51.0	-3.0	51.0	Yes	113	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		48.0	55.0	7.0	51.0	Yes	161	75	On Target
High needs		47.0	49.0	2.0	51.0	Yes	59	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		38.0	46.0	8.0	51.0	Yes	42	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	8	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		40.0	56.5	16.5	51.0	Yes	28	100	Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	12	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	20	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	11	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
White		49.0	53.0	4.0	51.0	Yes	112	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	11.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	11.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	11.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	260	256	98	Yes	260	254	98	Yes	95	95	100	Yes
High needs	90	88	98	Yes	90	86	96	Yes	42	42	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	64	62	97	Yes	64	61	95	Yes	28	28	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	14	-	-	-	14	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	38	36	95	Yes	38	35	97	Yes	20	20	100	Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	25	-	-	-	25	-	-	-	6	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	28	27	96	Yes	28	27	96	Yes	9	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	9	-	-	-	9	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	17	-	-	-	17	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
White	180	177	98	Yes	180	175	97	Yes	72	72	100	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.