Massachusetts School and District Profiles

John F Kennedy
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - John F Kennedy
Organization Information
District:Canton (00500000)School type:Elementary School
School:John F Kennedy (00500017)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.2, Target = 96.1CPI = 91.2, Target = 96.1CPI = 91.2, Target = 96.1 93.3 94.7 91.2 -3.5 96.1 96.7 752430Declined
High needsCPI = 76.7, Target = 88.7CPI = 76.7, Target = 88.7CPI = 76.7, Target = 88.7 80.6 81.7 76.7 -5.0 88.7 90.3 54600Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged -------22--
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 68.2, Target = 87CPI = 68.2, Target = 87CPI = 68.2, Target = 87 77.7 74.2 68.2 -6.0 87.0 88.9 61370Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 93.9, Target = 97.6CPI = 93.9, Target = 97.6CPI = 93.9, Target = 97.6 95.8 92.6 93.9 1.3 97.6 97.9 513375On Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------14--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91, Target = 96.7CPI = 91, Target = 96.7CPI = 91, Target = 96.7 94.3 95.7 91.0 -4.7 96.7 97.2 671810Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 92.9, Target = 96.8CPI = 92.9, Target = 96.8CPI = 92.9, Target = 96.8 94.5 91.1 92.9 1.8 96.8 97.3 8424275On Target
High needsCPI = 79.7, Target = 88.9CPI = 79.7, Target = 88.9CPI = 79.7, Target = 88.9 81.0 74.5 79.7 5.2 88.9 90.5 665950Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------22--
EL and Former EL -------10--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 69.4, Target = 88.2CPI = 69.4, Target = 88.2CPI = 69.4, Target = 88.2 79.7 64.8 69.4 4.6 88.2 89.9 643650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
AsianCPI = 97, Target = 100CPI = 97, Target = 100CPI = 97, Target = 100 100.0 94.4 97.0 2.6 100.0 100.0 6433100Above Target
Afr. Amer./Black -------14--
Hispanic/Latino -------7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.4, Target = 97.3CPI = 92.4, Target = 97.3CPI = 92.4, Target = 97.3 95.3 92.1 92.4 0.3 97.3 97.7 7718075On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.7, Target = 95.3CPI = 87.7, Target = 95.3CPI = 87.7, Target = 95.3 91.9 91.8 87.7 -4.1 95.3 96.0 74830Declined
High needs -------19--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------6--
EL and Former EL -------3--
Students w/ disabilities -------14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------15--
Afr. Amer./Black -------5--
Hispanic/Latino -------2--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.4, Target = 96CPI = 88.4, Target = 96CPI = 88.4, Target = 96 93.2 94.0 88.4 -5.6 96.0 96.6 66560Declined
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 29.8 16.02430 2.4 3.32430
High needs 7.7 5.0600 11.5 10.06025
Econ. Disadvantaged--22---22-
EL and Former EL--10---10-
Students w/ disabilities 3.1 2.7370 15.6 16.2370
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 29.6 33.33325 7.4 3.03325
Afr. Amer./Black--14---14-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 30.1 13.81810 1.0 2.81810
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 47.8 46.72420 4.4 4.12420
High needs 19.2 15.3590 21.2 13.65925
Econ. Disadvantaged--22---22-
EL and Former EL--10---10-
Students w/ disabilities 9.4 8.3360 34.4 22.23625
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian 66.7 69.7330 3.7 3.03325
Afr. Amer./Black--14---14-
Hispanic/Latino--7---7-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 48.5 45.61800 3.1 3.91800
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 40.0 26.5830 2.4 4.8830
High needs--19---19-
Econ. Disadvantaged--6---6-
EL and Former EL--3---3-
Students w/ disabilities--14---14-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--15---15-
Afr. Amer./Black--5---5-
Hispanic/Latino--2---2-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--5---5-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 38.0 28.6560 0.0 3.6560
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 43.5, Target = 51SGP = 43.5, Target = 51SGP = 43.5, Target = 51 54.0 43.5 -10.5 51.0No15650Below Target
High needsSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 45.5 34.0 -11.5 51.0No3725Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-14--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-20--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51SGP = 41, Target = 51 54.0 41.0 -13.0 51.0No11850Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 38.0 39.0 1.0 51.0Yes15875On Target
High needsSGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51SGP = 32, Target = 51 21.0 32.0 11.0 51.0Yes3775On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-14--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-7--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-23--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-20--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-7--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51SGP = 37, Target = 51 36.5 37.0 0.5 51.0No12050Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.010-
High needs- 60.010-
EL and Former EL- 60.010-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students249249100Yes249248100Yes8585100Yes
High needs6464100Yes646398Yes20---
Econ. Disadvantaged25---25---7---
EL and Former EL11---11---3---
Students w/ disabilities3939100Yes393897Yes15---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian3333100Yes3333100Yes15---
Afr. Amer./Black17---17---6---
Hispanic/Latino8---8---2---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.8---8---5---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White183183100Yes18318299Yes5757100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles