Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Peabody

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Peabody

Organization Information
District:Cambridge (00490000)School type:Elementary School
School:Peabody (00490050)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Greater BostonTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.7, Target = 86.5CPI = 89.7, Target = 86.5CPI = 89.7, Target = 86.5 79.8 91.3 89.7 -1.6 86.5 89.9 68131100Above Target
High needsCPI = 82.6, Target = 81CPI = 82.6, Target = 81CPI = 82.6, Target = 81 71.5 84.0 82.6 -1.4 81.0 85.8 8069100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 85.6, Target = 86CPI = 85.6, Target = 86 84.7 84.7 85.6 0.9 86.0 92.4 884575On Target
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 73, Target = 70.9CPI = 73, Target = 70.9CPI = 73, Target = 70.9 56.4 69.8 73.0 3.2 70.9 78.2 7238100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------9--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 91.3, Target = 80.8CPI = 91.3, Target = 80.8CPI = 91.3, Target = 80.8 71.2 85.3 91.3 6.0 80.8 85.6 9843100Above Target
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 93.1, Target = 93.3CPI = 93.1, Target = 93.3 89.9 95.9 93.1 -2.8 93.3 95.0 805475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.3, Target = 85.4CPI = 91.3, Target = 85.4CPI = 91.3, Target = 85.4 78.1 90.1 91.3 1.2 85.4 89.1 77130100Above Target
High needsCPI = 85.3, Target = 79.8CPI = 85.3, Target = 79.8CPI = 85.3, Target = 79.8 69.7 83.2 85.3 2.1 79.8 84.9 8768100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 84.4, Target = 83.6CPI = 84.4, Target = 83.6 82.1 82.1 84.4 2.3 83.6 91.1 824575On Target
EL and Former EL -------7--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 78.4, Target = 70.5CPI = 78.4, Target = 70.5CPI = 78.4, Target = 70.5 55.8 72.4 78.4 6.0 70.5 77.9 8537100Above Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------9--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 87.2, Target = 78.3CPI = 87.2, Target = 78.3CPI = 87.2, Target = 78.3 67.5 80.1 87.2 7.1 78.3 83.8 9643100Above Target
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------11--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
WhiteCPI = 96.7, Target = 93.3CPI = 96.7, Target = 93.3CPI = 96.7, Target = 93.3 89.9 97.7 96.7 -1.0 93.3 95.0 9753100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 79.1, Target = 73.5CPI = 79.1, Target = 73.5CPI = 79.1, Target = 73.5 60.3 73.2 79.1 5.9 73.5 80.2 4443100Above Target
High needs -------18--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------14--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------8--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------14--
Hispanic/Latino -------5--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
White -------18--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 25.6 27.51310 3.1 4.61310
High needs 15.6 13.0690 6.3 8.7690
Econ. Disadvantaged 20.4 15.6450 6.1 4.44525
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 5.33825 13.8 15.8380
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--9---9-
Afr. Amer./Black 20.5 14.0430 7.7 0.04325
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 30.9 44.45425 1.8 1.9540
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 43.4 46.21300 7.0 3.813025
High needs 29.7 27.9680 14.1 5.96825
Econ. Disadvantaged 32.7 33.3450 14.3 6.74525
EL and Former EL--7---7-
Students w/ disabilities 17.2 10.8370 31.0 10.83725
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--9---9-
Afr. Amer./Black 23.1 30.24325 17.9 7.04325
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--11---11-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White 58.2 64.25325 0.0 0.05325
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 14.6 11.6430 14.6 9.34325
High needs--18---18-
Econ. Disadvantaged--14---14-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--8---8-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--14---14-
Hispanic/Latino--5---5-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White--18---18-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 48.5, Target = 51SGP = 48.5, Target = 51SGP = 48.5, Target = 51 48.5 48.5 0.0 51.0No9050Below Target
High needsSGP = 33.5, Target = 51SGP = 33.5, Target = 51SGP = 33.5, Target = 51 35.0 33.5 -1.5 51.0No4425Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 30.0 43.0 13.0 51.0No2875On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-25--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-8--
Afr. Amer./BlackSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 32.5 34.0 1.5 51.0No2450Below Target
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 65.0 52.0 -13.0 51.0No3875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 67.5 44.0 -23.5 51.0No8950Below Target
High needsSGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51SGP = 33, Target = 51 55.0 33.0 -22.0 51.0No4325Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 35.5, Target = 51SGP = 35.5, Target = 51SGP = 35.5, Target = 51 55.0 35.5 -19.5 51.0No2825Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-8--
Afr. Amer./BlackSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 54.5 34.0 -20.5 51.0No2425Below Target
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-10--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0-1--
WhiteSGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51SGP = 46, Target = 51 69.0 46.0 -23.0 51.0No3750Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.010-
High needs- 60.010-
EL and Former EL- 60.010-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students132132100Yes13213199Yes4444100Yes
High needs6969100Yes696899Yes18---
Econ. Disadvantaged4545100Yes4545100Yes14---
EL and Former EL7---7---1---
Students w/ disabilities3838100Yes383797Yes8---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian9---9---3---
Afr. Amer./Black4343100Yes4343100Yes14---
Hispanic/Latino13---13---5---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.11---11---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1---1---
White5555100Yes555498Yes19---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles