Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Brookfield Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Brookfield Elementary
Organization Information
District:Brookfield (00450000)School type:Elementary School
School:Brookfield Elementary (00450005)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05,06
Region:CentralTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.3, Target = 93CPI = 87.3, Target = 93CPI = 87.3, Target = 93 88.0 84.7 87.3 2.6 93.0 94.0 5817150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 77, Target = 88.1CPI = 77, Target = 88.1CPI = 77, Target = 88.1 79.6 71.6 77.0 5.4 88.1 89.8 566150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 82.4, Target = 81.3CPI = 82.4, Target = 81.3CPI = 82.4, Target = 81.3 79.6 79.6 82.4 2.8 81.3 89.8 774475On Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.8, Target = 93.1CPI = 87.8, Target = 93.1CPI = 87.8, Target = 93.1 88.2 85.0 87.8 2.8 93.1 94.1 4815450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.3, Target = 91.1CPI = 88.3, Target = 91.1CPI = 88.3, Target = 91.1 84.8 85.2 88.3 3.1 91.1 92.4 6317150Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 79.9, Target = 86.1CPI = 79.9, Target = 86.1CPI = 79.9, Target = 86.1 76.2 76.5 79.9 3.4 86.1 88.1 686150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 82.4, Target = 84.4CPI = 82.4, Target = 84.4CPI = 82.4, Target = 84.4 83.0 83.0 82.4 -0.6 84.4 91.5 754425No Change
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilities -------24--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------9--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.3, Target = 91.3CPI = 88.3, Target = 91.3CPI = 88.3, Target = 91.3 85.0 86.0 88.3 2.3 91.3 92.5 5215450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.9, Target = 93.8CPI = 85.9, Target = 93.8CPI = 85.9, Target = 93.8 89.3 84.6 85.9 1.3 93.8 94.7 674850Improved Below Target
High needs -------18--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.3, Target = 93.9CPI = 89.3, Target = 93.9CPI = 89.3, Target = 93.9 89.5 84.1 89.3 5.2 93.9 94.8 724275On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 9.8 8.81710 10.4 6.417125
High needs 6.0 3.3610 22.4 14.86125
Econ. Disadvantaged 8.2 4.5440 12.2 11.4440
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--24---24-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 9.5 9.11540 10.1 6.515425
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 26.5 33.317125 6.6 5.817125
High needs 10.8 21.36125 15.4 13.16125
Econ. Disadvantaged 12.8 27.34425 8.5 9.1440
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities--24---24-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--8---8-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--9---9-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 27.7 35.115425 6.6 5.815425
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 21.3 33.34825 4.3 4.2480
High needs--18---18-
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--6---6-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 22.7 35.74225 4.5 0.04225
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 47.0 39.0 -8.0 51.0Yes12975On Target
High needsSGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51SGP = 42, Target = 51 51.0 42.0 -9.0 51.0No4750Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 25, Target = 51SGP = 25, Target = 51SGP = 25, Target = 51 50.0 25.0 -25.0 51.0Yes3375On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51SGP = 39, Target = 51 46.0 39.0 -7.0 51.0Yes11975On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 62.5 65.0 2.5 51.0Yes128100Above Target
High needsSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 55.0 65.0 10.0 51.0No47100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51 58.0 63.0 5.0 51.0No33100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-2--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-18--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0----
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-6--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51SGP = 65, Target = 51 64.0 65.0 1.0 51.0Yes118100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.03-
High needs- 60.03-
EL and Former EL- 60.03-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students17317199Yes17317199Yes4848100Yes
High needs636197Yes636197Yes18---
Econ. Disadvantaged464496Yes464496Yes13---
EL and Former EL2---2---1---
Students w/ disabilities24---24---6---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian------------
Afr. Amer./Black------------
Hispanic/Latino8---8---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.9---9---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White15615499Yes15615499Yes4242100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles