Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Eddy Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Eddy Elementary
Organization Information
District:Brewster (00410000)School type:Elementary School
School:Eddy Elementary (00410010)Grades served:03,04,05
Region:SoutheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 2
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 87.1, Target = 94.9CPI = 87.1, Target = 94.9CPI = 87.1, Target = 94.9 91.3 86.5 87.1 0.6 94.9 95.7 5721550Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 71.6, Target = 87.8CPI = 71.6, Target = 87.8CPI = 71.6, Target = 87.8 79.0 71.6 71.6 0.0 87.8 89.5 308125No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 73.1, Target = 79.6CPI = 73.1, Target = 79.6CPI = 73.1, Target = 79.6 77.7 77.7 73.1 -4.6 79.6 88.9 31520Declined
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 64.4, Target = 78.3CPI = 64.4, Target = 78.3CPI = 64.4, Target = 78.3 62.8 60.8 64.4 3.6 78.3 81.4 494750Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 88.1, Target = 95.1CPI = 88.1, Target = 95.1CPI = 88.1, Target = 95.1 91.6 87.9 88.1 0.2 95.1 95.8 5019350Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.5, Target = 95.7CPI = 86.5, Target = 95.7CPI = 86.5, Target = 95.7 92.7 86.4 86.5 0.1 95.7 96.4 5321650Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 70.7, Target = 90.9CPI = 70.7, Target = 90.9CPI = 70.7, Target = 90.9 84.4 72.8 70.7 -2.1 90.9 92.2 288125No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 73.1, Target = 78.7CPI = 73.1, Target = 78.7CPI = 73.1, Target = 78.7 76.8 76.8 73.1 -3.7 78.7 88.4 36520Declined
EL and Former EL -------9--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 58, Target = 86.5CPI = 58, Target = 86.5CPI = 58, Target = 86.5 76.9 57.6 58.0 0.4 86.5 88.5 314750Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------3--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.6, Target = 95.9CPI = 87.6, Target = 95.9CPI = 87.6, Target = 95.9 92.9 87.6 87.6 0.0 95.9 96.5 4819425No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 93.5, Target = 95.9CPI = 93.5, Target = 95.9CPI = 93.5, Target = 95.9 92.9 93.0 93.5 0.5 95.9 96.5 9473100Above Target
High needsCPI = 85, Target = 92.2CPI = 85, Target = 92.2CPI = 85, Target = 92.2 86.7 89.0 85.0 -4.0 92.2 93.4 942575On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------14--
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilities -------16--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------1--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------2--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 93.8, Target = 95.5CPI = 93.8, Target = 95.5CPI = 93.8, Target = 95.5 92.2 94.0 93.8 -0.2 95.5 96.1 9165100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 10.5 10.22150 6.7 2.821525
High needs 5.0 4.9810 17.5 7.48125
Econ. Disadvantaged 7.3 7.7520 14.5 7.75225
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0470 29.5 10.64725
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 10.9 10.91930 6.0 2.619325
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 30.1 31.02160 7.7 6.921625
High needs 10.1 13.68125 19.0 16.08125
Econ. Disadvantaged 14.5 19.25225 18.2 15.45225
EL and Former EL--9---9-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 4.34725 32.6 27.74725
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--3---3-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--4---4-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 31.7 33.01940 6.0 6.21940
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 34.4 39.77325 3.3 1.47325
High needs 20.0 20.0250 8.0 4.02525
Econ. Disadvantaged--14---14-
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities--16---16-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--1---1-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--2---2-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 37.0 41.56525 1.9 1.56525
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 38.0 51.0 13.0 51.0No14475On Target
High needsSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 36.0 49.0 13.0 51.0No5675On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 37.0 54.0 17.0 51.0No38100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51SGP = 44.5, Target = 51 32.0 44.5 12.5 51.0No3475On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 38.0 50.0 12.0 51.0No12775On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 60.5 56.0 -4.5 51.0No14575On Target
High needsSGP = 48.5, Target = 51SGP = 48.5, Target = 51SGP = 48.5, Target = 51 48.5 48.5 0.0 51.0No5650Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 58.5, Target = 51SGP = 58.5, Target = 51SGP = 58.5, Target = 51 55.0 58.5 3.5 51.0No3875On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-3--
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51 38.0 42.5 4.5 51.0No3450Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51 58.0 57.5 -0.5 51.0No12875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.05-
High needs- 60.05-
EL and Former EL- 60.05-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students23022698Yes22822699Yes7676100Yes
High needs949298Yes939198Yes2828100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged626097Yes615997Yes15---
EL and Former EL11---11---1---
Students w/ disabilities5151100Yes5151100Yes18---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian4---4---2---
Afr. Amer./Black11---10---4---
Hispanic/Latino9---9---1---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.4---4---2---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White20219999Yes201200100Yes6767100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles