Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Winship Elementary School

Districts Schools
Select an Org
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Winship Elementary

Organization Information
District:Boston (00350000)School type:Elementary School
School:Winship Elementary (00350374)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 3
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 73.2, Target = 84.8CPI = 73.2, Target = 84.8CPI = 73.2, Target = 84.8 74.0 63.8 73.2 9.4 84.8 87.0 139750Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 68.8, Target = 84CPI = 68.8, Target = 84CPI = 68.8, Target = 84 72.6 58.2 68.8 10.6 84.0 86.3 208150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 70.6, Target = 63.2CPI = 70.6, Target = 63.2CPI = 70.6, Target = 63.2 59.8 59.8 70.6 10.8 63.2 79.9 2463100Above Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 70, Target = 81.9CPI = 70, Target = 81.9CPI = 70, Target = 81.9 68.9 54.7 70.0 15.3 81.9 84.5 484050Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities -------20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 69, Target = 83.5CPI = 69, Target = 83.5CPI = 69, Target = 83.5 71.7- 69.0 4.3 83.5 85.9 312550Improved Below Target
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 68.2, Target = 80.8CPI = 68.2, Target = 80.8CPI = 68.2, Target = 80.8 67.1 57.6 68.2 10.6 80.8 83.6 303750Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
White -------18--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 78.1, Target = 86.5CPI = 78.1, Target = 86.5CPI = 78.1, Target = 86.5 76.9 68.9 78.1 9.2 86.5 88.5 229850Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 75.3, Target = 86.6CPI = 75.3, Target = 86.6CPI = 75.3, Target = 86.6 77.1 64.4 75.3 10.9 86.6 88.6 488150Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 75, Target = 65.6CPI = 75, Target = 65.6CPI = 75, Target = 65.6 62.5 62.5 75.0 12.5 65.6 81.3 4363100Above Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 75.6, Target = 89.7CPI = 75.6, Target = 89.7CPI = 75.6, Target = 89.7 82.4 67.4 75.6 8.2 89.7 91.2 554050Improved Below Target
Students w/ disabilities -------20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------10--
Afr. Amer./BlackCPI = 71, Target = 77.8CPI = 71, Target = 77.8CPI = 71, Target = 77.8 62.0- 71.0 -1.8 77.8 81.0 472525No Change
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 77, Target = 84.2CPI = 77, Target = 84.2CPI = 77, Target = 84.2 72.9 65.1 77.0 11.9 84.2 86.5 663750Improved Below Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. -------1--
White -------19--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 55.2, Target = 81CPI = 55.2, Target = 81CPI = 55.2, Target = 81 67.5 51.4 55.2 3.8 81.0 83.8 82950Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 48.9, Target = 81CPI = 48.9, Target = 81CPI = 48.9, Target = 81 67.5 50.9 48.9 -2.0 81.0 83.8 102225No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged -------17--
EL and Former EL -------11--
Students w/ disabilities -------3--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------8--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------7--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 2.0 4.19725 24.0 15.59725
High needs 2.5 0.0810 29.1 18.58125
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.3 0.0630 26.2 17.56325
EL and Former EL 3.1 0.0400 34.4 17.54025
Students w/ disabilities--20---20-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black 2.9 0.0250 14.7 24.0250
Hispanic/Latino 0.0 5.43725 30.2 13.53725
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White--18---18-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 16.2 24.59825 24.2 16.39825
High needs 12.8 17.38125 28.2 18.58125
Econ. Disadvantaged 12.1 20.66325 31.0 19.06325
EL and Former EL 18.2 22.54025 18.2 22.5400
Students w/ disabilities--20---20-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--10---10-
Afr. Amer./Black 11.8 16.02525 17.6 20.0250
Hispanic/Latino 7.0 13.53725 25.6 18.93725
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--1---1-
White--19---19-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced
2016
% Advanced
N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing
2016
% Warning/Failing
N PPI Points
All students 0.0 3.42925 36.1 37.9290
High needs 0.0 0.0220 37.0 50.0220
Econ. Disadvantaged--17---17-
EL and Former EL--11---11-
Students w/ disabilities--3---3-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--8---8-
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--7---7-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 62.5, Target = 51SGP = 62.5, Target = 51SGP = 62.5, Target = 51 35.0 62.5 27.5 51.0Yes52100Above Target
High needsSGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51 23.0 55.5 32.5 51.0Yes44100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 21.0 55.0 34.0 51.0Yes35100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-19--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-6--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-15--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51SGP = 56, Target = 51 24.0 56.0 32.0 51.0Yes20100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-7--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 30.0 45.0 15.0 51.0Yes52100Above Target
High needsSGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51SGP = 43, Target = 51 29.0 43.0 14.0 51.0Yes4375On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51SGP = 42.5, Target = 51 27.0 42.5 15.5 51.0Yes34100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-18--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-11--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-6--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-15--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-19--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-4--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-8--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 63.0 60.05125
High needs 63.0 60.05125
EL and Former EL 63.0 60.05125
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students10410399Yes10510499Yes302997Yes
High needs868599Yes868599Yes232296Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged666598Yes666598Yes17---
EL and Former EL4242100Yes4242100Yes12---
Students w/ disabilities21---21---3---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian10---10---4---
Afr. Amer./Black2626100Yes2626100Yes8---
Hispanic/Latino3939100Yes3939100Yes10---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.6---6---1---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.1---1-------
White22---23---7---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles