Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Adams Elementary School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Samuel Adams
Organization Information
District:Boston (00350000)School type:Elementary School
School:Samuel Adams (00350302)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 71.7, Target = 77.8CPI = 71.7, Target = 77.8CPI = 71.7, Target = 77.8 61.9 73.5 71.7 -1.8 77.8 81.0 1111225No Change
High needsCPI = 69.2, Target = 77.5CPI = 69.2, Target = 77.5CPI = 69.2, Target = 77.5 61.4 72.8 69.2 -3.6 77.5 80.7 22990Declined
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 72.2, Target = 75.6CPI = 72.2, Target = 75.6CPI = 72.2, Target = 75.6 73.4 73.4 72.2 -1.2 75.6 86.7 285325No Change
EL and Former ELCPI = 70.1, Target = 76.6CPI = 70.1, Target = 76.6CPI = 70.1, Target = 76.6 59.9 70.4 70.1 -0.3 76.6 80.0 498125No Change
Students w/ disabilities  46.6---- 73.3-27--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------7--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 68.5, Target = 76.9CPI = 68.5, Target = 76.9CPI = 68.5, Target = 76.9 60.4 72.3 68.5 -3.8 76.9 80.2 32850Declined
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------18--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 75.9, Target = 81.4CPI = 75.9, Target = 81.4CPI = 75.9, Target = 81.4 68.1 78.1 75.9 -2.2 81.4 84.1 1711225No Change
High needsCPI = 74.5, Target = 80.9CPI = 74.5, Target = 80.9CPI = 74.5, Target = 80.9 67.3 76.9 74.5 -2.4 80.9 83.7 449925No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 74.1, Target = 77.8CPI = 74.1, Target = 77.8CPI = 74.1, Target = 77.8 75.8 75.8 74.1 -1.7 77.8 87.9 415325No Change
EL and Former ELCPI = 75.6, Target = 80.9CPI = 75.6, Target = 80.9CPI = 75.6, Target = 80.9 67.2 77.8 75.6 -2.2 80.9 83.6 558125No Change
Students w/ disabilities  52.6---- 76.3-27--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------7--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 73.5, Target = 80.6CPI = 73.5, Target = 80.6CPI = 73.5, Target = 80.6 66.7 75.6 73.5 -2.1 80.6 83.4 488525No Change
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------1--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------18--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 51.7, Target = 71.4CPI = 51.7, Target = 71.4CPI = 51.7, Target = 71.4 51.0 58.7 51.7 -7.0 71.4 75.5 7300Declined
High needs  51.0---- 75.5-28--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------15--
EL and Former EL -------22--
Students w/ disabilities -------6--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino  59.1---- 79.6-21--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------5--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 1.9 3.611225 17.5 17.01120
High needs 1.1 1.0990 18.9 19.2990
Econ. Disadvantaged 1.6 0.0530 17.7 15.15325
EL and Former EL 0.0 1.28125 18.6 18.5810
Students w/ disabilities--27---27-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--7---7-
Hispanic/Latino 1.3 3.58525 18.7 21.2850
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--18---18-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 7.6 8.911225 14.3 19.61120
High needs 7.6 9.19925 14.1 22.2990
Econ. Disadvantaged 3.2 3.85325 12.7 22.6530
EL and Former EL 9.9 11.18125 12.7 19.8810
Students w/ disabilities--27---27-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--7---7-
Hispanic/Latino 7.8 7.1850 16.9 23.5850
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--1---1-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--18---18-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 0.0 0.0300 26.9 33.3300
High needs--28---28-
Econ. Disadvantaged--15---15-
EL and Former EL--22---22-
Students w/ disabilities--6---6-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--21---21-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--5---5-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 68.5 55.0 -13.5 51.0No5975On Target
High needsSGP = 50.5, Target = 51SGP = 50.5, Target = 51 66.5 50.5 -16.0 51.0No5075On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51 66.5 45.5 -21.0 51.0No3050Below Target
EL and Former ELSGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51SGP = 57.5, Target = 51 68.0 57.5 -10.5 51.0No4075On Target
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51SGP = 55, Target = 51 68.5 55.0 -13.5 51.0No4175On Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-13--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51SGP = 66, Target = 51 63.5 66.0 2.5 51.0No60100Above Target
High needsSGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51 58.0 67.0 9.0 51.0No51100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51 53.5 63.0 9.5 51.0Yes30100Above Target
EL and Former ELSGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51 59.0 67.0 8.0 51.0No41100Above Target
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51 57.5 67.0 9.5 51.0No42100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-13--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 68.0 60.012025
High needs 68.0 60.012025
EL and Former EL 68.0 60.012025
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students116116100Yes116116100Yes3030100Yes
High needs103103100Yes103103100Yes2828100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged5656100Yes5656100Yes15---
EL and Former EL8484100Yes8484100Yes2222100Yes
Students w/ disabilities2727100Yes2727100Yes6---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1---1---
Afr. Amer./Black7---7---3---
Hispanic/Latino8888100Yes8888100Yes2121100Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.1---1-------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White19---19---5---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles