Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Kennedy Patrick J Elementary School
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Patrick J Kennedy
Organization Information
District:Boston (00350000)School type:Elementary School
School:Patrick J Kennedy (00350264)Grades served:PK,K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:Commissioner's DistrictsTitle I status:Title I School (SW)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 88.5, Target = 85.3CPI = 88.5, Target = 85.3CPI = 88.5, Target = 85.3 74.8 76.9 88.5 11.6 85.3 87.4 64109100Above Target
High needsCPI = 88.1, Target = 85CPI = 88.1, Target = 85CPI = 88.1, Target = 85 74.2 76.2 88.1 11.9 85.0 87.1 96103100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 88.5, Target = 78.3CPI = 88.5, Target = 78.3CPI = 88.5, Target = 78.3 76.3 76.3 88.5 12.2 78.3 88.2 9461100Above Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 87.5, Target = 84.8CPI = 87.5, Target = 84.8CPI = 87.5, Target = 84.8 74.0 76.2 87.5 11.3 84.8 87.0 9288100Above Target
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 88.9, Target = 85.2CPI = 88.9, Target = 85.2CPI = 88.9, Target = 85.2 74.7 75.6 88.9 13.3 85.2 87.4 9697100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------8--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 89.4, Target = 84.3CPI = 89.4, Target = 84.3CPI = 89.4, Target = 84.3 73.0 81.3 89.4 8.1 84.3 86.5 68109100Above Target
High needsCPI = 89.3, Target = 83.9CPI = 89.3, Target = 83.9CPI = 89.3, Target = 83.9 72.4 80.1 89.3 9.2 83.9 86.2 95103100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 87.3, Target = 80.4CPI = 87.3, Target = 80.4CPI = 87.3, Target = 80.4 78.6 78.6 87.3 8.7 80.4 89.3 9161100Above Target
EL and Former ELCPI = 89.2, Target = 84CPI = 89.2, Target = 84CPI = 89.2, Target = 84 72.6 79.3 89.2 9.9 84.0 86.3 8988100Above Target
Students w/ disabilities -------10--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------1--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/LatinoCPI = 89.7, Target = 84.9CPI = 89.7, Target = 84.9CPI = 89.7, Target = 84.9 74.1 80.2 89.7 9.5 84.9 87.1 9697100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------8--
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 67, Target = 76.7CPI = 67, Target = 76.7CPI = 67, Target = 76.7 60.0 63.1 67.0 3.9 76.7 80.0 192550Improved Below Target
High needs  58.8---- 79.4-24--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------15--
EL and Former EL  57.3---- 78.7-20--
Students w/ disabilities -------2--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino  60.5---- 80.3-23--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. ----------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
White -------1--
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 3.2 5.510925 9.7 2.810925
High needs 3.6 5.810325 10.7 2.910325
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 3.36125 8.9 3.36125
EL and Former EL 4.6 5.78825 10.8 3.48825
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino 3.8 5.29725 9.0 2.19725
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--8---8-
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 19.6 26.610925 6.5 0.910925
High needs 20.5 27.210325 7.2 1.010325
Econ. Disadvantaged 19.6 29.56125 8.9 1.66125
EL and Former EL 20.3 25.08825 7.8 1.18825
Students w/ disabilities--10---10-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--1---1-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino 18.2 25.89725 6.5 1.09725
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--8---8-
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 0.0 0.0250 23.8 8.02525
High needs--24---24-
Econ. Disadvantaged--15---15-
EL and Former EL--20---20-
Students w/ disabilities--2---2-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--23---23-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White--1---1-
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51 34.5 63.0 28.5 51.0Yes56100Above Target
High needsSGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51SGP = 63, Target = 51 32.0 63.0 31.0 51.0Yes53100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51SGP = 54.5, Target = 51 41.0 54.5 13.5 51.0Yes3475On Target
EL and Former ELSGP = 64.5, Target = 51SGP = 64.5, Target = 51SGP = 64.5, Target = 51 34.5 64.5 30.0 51.0Yes44100Above Target
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 64.5, Target = 51SGP = 64.5, Target = 51SGP = 64.5, Target = 51 32.0 64.5 32.5 51.0Yes50100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-4--
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 61.5, Target = 51SGP = 61.5, Target = 51SGP = 61.5, Target = 51 30.0 61.5 31.5 51.0Yes56100Above Target
High needsSGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51SGP = 62, Target = 51 29.5 62.0 32.5 51.0Yes53100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51SGP = 58, Target = 51 30.0 58.0 28.0 51.0Yes34100Above Target
EL and Former ELSGP = 68.5, Target = 51SGP = 68.5, Target = 51SGP = 68.5, Target = 51 37.0 68.5 31.5 51.0Yes44100Above Target
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-5--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-1--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-1--
Hispanic/LatinoSGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51SGP = 67, Target = 51 29.5 67.0 37.5 51.0Yes50100Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0----
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
White --- 51.0-4--
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students 49.0 60.01510
High needs 49.0 60.01510
EL and Former EL 49.0 60.01510
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students115115100Yes115115100Yes2626100Yes
High needs109109100Yes109109100Yes2525100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged6262100Yes6262100Yes15---
EL and Former EL9494100Yes9494100Yes2121100Yes
Students w/ disabilities10---10---2---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian1---1-------
Afr. Amer./Black3---3---1---
Hispanic/Latino103103100Yes103103100Yes2424100Yes
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.------------
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White8---8---1---

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles