Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Parker
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Parker
Organization Information
District:Billerica (00310000)School type:Elementary School
School:Parker (00310015)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.1, Target = 91.1CPI = 84.1, Target = 91.1CPI = 84.1, Target = 91.1 84.8 85.9 84.1 -1.8 91.1 92.4 4321125No Change
High needsCPI = 72, Target = 81.6CPI = 72, Target = 81.6CPI = 72, Target = 81.6 68.5 73.6 72.0 -1.6 81.6 84.3 327525No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 75.6, Target = 76.4CPI = 75.6, Target = 76.4 74.3 74.3 75.6 1.3 76.4 87.2 444275On Target
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 64.8, Target = 79.6CPI = 64.8, Target = 79.6CPI = 64.8, Target = 79.6 65.1 66.8 64.8 -2.0 79.6 82.6 514925No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------14--
Afr. Amer./Black -------10--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.9, Target = 91.1CPI = 83.9, Target = 91.1CPI = 83.9, Target = 91.1 84.8 85.7 83.9 -1.8 91.1 92.4 2716825No Change
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 85.7, Target = 86.8CPI = 85.7, Target = 86.8CPI = 85.7, Target = 86.8 77.4 85.1 85.7 0.6 86.8 88.7 5121175On Target
High needsCPI = 72.3, Target = 76.6CPI = 72.3, Target = 76.6CPI = 72.3, Target = 76.6 59.9 72.9 72.3 -0.6 76.6 80.0 337525No Change
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 73.2, Target = 72.1CPI = 73.2, Target = 72.1CPI = 73.2, Target = 72.1 69.6 69.6 73.2 3.6 72.1 84.8 374275On Target
EL and Former EL -------1--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 65.8, Target = 74.4CPI = 65.8, Target = 74.4CPI = 65.8, Target = 74.4 56.1 69.2 65.8 -3.4 74.4 78.1 54490Declined
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------14--
Afr. Amer./Black -------10--
Hispanic/Latino -------13--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 85.3, Target = 87.1CPI = 85.3, Target = 87.1CPI = 85.3, Target = 87.1 77.9 84.6 85.3 0.7 87.1 89.0 3516850Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 69.7, Target = 81.6CPI = 69.7, Target = 81.6CPI = 69.7, Target = 81.6 68.4 69.4 69.7 0.3 81.6 84.2 237150Improved Below Target
High needs  50.0---- 75.0-26--
Econ. Disadvantaged -------13--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities  50.0---- 75.0-20--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------2--
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 70.8, Target = 82.1CPI = 70.8, Target = 82.1CPI = 70.8, Target = 82.1 69.3 69.0 70.8 1.8 82.1 84.7 105950Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 12.2 6.62110 4.9 5.72110
High needs 2.7 5.37525 11.0 13.3750
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.4 4.8420 10.8 11.9420
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 4.14925 15.4 20.4490
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--14---14-
Afr. Amer./Black--10---10-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 12.4 6.51680 5.3 6.01680
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 31.1 28.02110 5.8 6.62110
High needs 11.0 17.37525 15.1 17.3750
Econ. Disadvantaged 10.8 19.04225 18.9 19.0420
EL and Former EL--1---1-
Students w/ disabilities 7.7 10.24925 21.2 24.5490
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--14---14-
Afr. Amer./Black--10---10-
Hispanic/Latino--13---13-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 27.6 27.41680 5.9 7.11680
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 9.0 11.37125 11.9 16.9710
High needs--26---26-
Econ. Disadvantaged--13---13-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--20---20-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--2---2-
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 9.3 11.95925 11.1 15.3590
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 51, Target = 51SGP = 51, Target = 51 65.0 51.0 -14.0 51.0No13075On Target
High needsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 56.5 50.0 -6.5 51.0No4350Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-21--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 48.5, Target = 51SGP = 48.5, Target = 51SGP = 48.5, Target = 51 55.0 48.5 -6.5 51.0No3250Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-11--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51SGP = 53.5, Target = 51 65.5 53.5 -12.0 51.0No10475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 50, Target = 51SGP = 50, Target = 51 74.0 50.0 -24.0 51.0No13150Below Target
High needsSGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51SGP = 44, Target = 51 62.0 44.0 -18.0 51.0No4350Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged --- 51.0-21--
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilitiesSGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51SGP = 34, Target = 51 62.0 34.0 -28.0 51.0No3225Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-11--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-5--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51SGP = 49, Target = 51 73.5 49.0 -24.5 51.0No10550Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.0--
High needs- 60.0--
EL and Former EL- 60.0--
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students215215100Yes215215100Yes7272100Yes
High needs7878100Yes7878100Yes2626100Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged4343100Yes4343100Yes13---
EL and Former EL2---2-------
Students w/ disabilities5050100Yes5050100Yes2020100Yes
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian14---14---2---
Afr. Amer./Black10---10---3---
Hispanic/Latino15---15---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.6---6---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White170170100Yes170170100Yes6060100Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles