Massachusetts School and District Profiles

North Beverly Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - North Beverly Elementary
Organization Information
District:Beverly (00300000)School type:Elementary School
School:North Beverly Elementary (00300040)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 86.7, Target = 90.3CPI = 86.7, Target = 90.3CPI = 86.7, Target = 90.3 83.3 80.8 86.7 5.9 90.3 91.7 5520850Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 76.4, Target = 81.7CPI = 76.4, Target = 81.7CPI = 76.4, Target = 81.7 68.6 64.7 76.4 11.7 81.7 84.3 537350Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 78.7, Target = 73.1CPI = 78.7, Target = 73.1CPI = 78.7, Target = 73.1 70.7 70.7 78.7 8.0 73.1 85.4 5847100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 65.1, Target = 76.3CPI = 65.1, Target = 76.3CPI = 65.1, Target = 76.3 59.3 50.6 65.1 14.5 76.3 79.7 523850Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 89.1, Target = 90.6CPI = 89.1, Target = 90.6CPI = 89.1, Target = 90.6 83.8 83.2 89.1 5.9 90.6 91.9 5618450Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 84.9, Target = 87.3CPI = 84.9, Target = 87.3CPI = 84.9, Target = 87.3 78.3 81.4 84.9 3.5 87.3 89.2 4820850Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 67.5, Target = 76.6CPI = 67.5, Target = 76.6CPI = 67.5, Target = 76.6 59.9 62.2 67.5 5.3 76.6 80.0 197350Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 68.1, Target = 67.4CPI = 68.1, Target = 67.4 64.4 64.4 68.1 3.7 67.4 82.2 194775On Target
EL and Former EL -------2--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 53.9, Target = 72.2CPI = 53.9, Target = 72.2CPI = 53.9, Target = 72.2 52.3 48.3 53.9 5.6 72.2 76.2 213850Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------1--
Hispanic/Latino -------11--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------8--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 87.4, Target = 88CPI = 87.4, Target = 88 79.4 83.1 87.4 4.3 88.0 89.7 4618475On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 80.7, Target = 84.7CPI = 80.7, Target = 84.7CPI = 80.7, Target = 84.7 73.7 69.4 80.7 11.3 84.7 86.9 497050Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 65.6, Target = 74.1CPI = 65.6, Target = 74.1CPI = 65.6, Target = 74.1 55.6 54.8 65.6 10.8 74.1 77.8 432450Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------16--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black ----------
Hispanic/Latino -------4--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 82.9, Target = 85.7CPI = 82.9, Target = 85.7CPI = 82.9, Target = 85.7 75.4 73.7 82.9 9.2 85.7 87.7 386350Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 12.8 14.420825 12.3 3.820825
High needs 3.8 2.7730 28.2 11.07325
Econ. Disadvantaged 5.8 4.3470 25.0 8.54725
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0380 39.5 18.43825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 13.7 15.818425 9.3 2.218425
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 19.8 33.220825 11.8 9.620825
High needs 5.1 13.77325 30.8 24.77325
Econ. Disadvantaged 7.7 14.94725 28.8 25.54725
EL and Former EL--2---2-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 7.93825 46.5 36.83825
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--1---1-
Hispanic/Latino--11---11-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--8---8-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 21.3 34.818425 10.4 7.118425
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 0.0 15.77025 14.1 10.07025
High needs 0.0 8.32425 30.8 20.82425
Econ. Disadvantaged--16---16-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--------
Hispanic/Latino--4---4-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 0.0 17.56325 8.9 7.96325
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 45.0 59.0 14.0 51.0Yes13775On Target
High needsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 40.0 53.0 13.0 51.0Yes4575On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 48.0 52.0 4.0 51.0Yes3075On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 45.0 59.0 14.0 51.0Yes12375On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 52, Target = 51SGP = 52, Target = 51 38.0 52.0 14.0 51.0Yes13775On Target
High needsSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 25.0 45.0 20.0 51.0Yes45100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51SGP = 45, Target = 51 40.0 45.0 5.0 51.0No3050Below Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0-1--
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-21--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0----
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-7--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51SGP = 54, Target = 51 37.0 54.0 17.0 51.0Yes123100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.01-
High needs- 60.01-
EL and Former EL- 60.01-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students214213100Yes214213100Yes737299Yes
High needs797899Yes797899Yes272696Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged5151100Yes5151100Yes18---
EL and Former EL2---2-------
Students w/ disabilities414098Yes414098Yes13---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian4---4-------
Afr. Amer./Black3---3---1---
Hispanic/Latino11---11---4---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.8---8---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White18818799Yes18818799Yes656498Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles