Massachusetts School and District Profiles

North Beverly Elementary

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - North Beverly Elementary

Organization Information

District:

Beverly (00300000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

North Beverly Elementary (00300040)

Grades served:

K,01,02,03,04,05

Region:

Northeast

Title I status:

Non-Title I School (NT)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		83.3	80.8	86.7	5.9	90.3	91.7	55	208	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		68.6	64.7	76.4	11.7	81.7	84.3	53	73	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		70.7	70.7	78.7	8.0	73.1	85.4	58	47	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		59.3	50.6	65.1	14.5	76.3	79.7	52	38	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		83.8	83.2	89.1	5.9	90.6	91.9	56	184	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		78.3	81.4	84.9	3.5	87.3	89.2	48	208	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		59.9	62.2	67.5	5.3	76.6	80.0	19	73	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		64.4	64.4	68.1	3.7	67.4	82.2	19	47	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	2	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		52.3	48.3	53.9	5.6	72.2	76.2	21	38	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		79.4	83.1	87.4	4.3	88.0	89.7	46	184	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		73.7	69.4	80.7	11.3	84.7	86.9	49	70	50	Improved Below Target
High needs		55.6	54.8	65.6	10.8	74.1	77.8	43	24	50	Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	16	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	12	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		75.4	73.7	82.9	9.2	85.7	87.7	38	63	50	Improved Below Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	12.8	14.4	208	25	12.3	3.8	208	25
High needs	3.8	2.7	73	0	28.2	11.0	73	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	5.8	4.3	47	0	25.0	8.5	47	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	38	0	39.5	18.4	38	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	13.7	15.8	184	25	9.3	2.2	184	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	19.8	33.2	208	25	11.8	9.6	208	25
High needs	5.1	13.7	73	25	30.8	24.7	73	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	7.7	14.9	47	25	28.8	25.5	47	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	2	-	-	-	2	-
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	7.9	38	25	46.5	36.8	38	25
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	21.3	34.8	184	25	10.4	7.1	184	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	0.0	15.7	70	25	14.1	10.0	70	25
High needs	0.0	8.3	24	25	30.8	20.8	24	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	16	-	-	-	16	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	12	-	-	-	12	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	0.0	17.5	63	25	8.9	7.9	63	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		45.0	59.0	14.0	51.0	Yes	137	75	On Target
High needs		40.0	53.0	13.0	51.0	Yes	45	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		48.0	52.0	4.0	51.0	Yes	30	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		45.0	59.0	14.0	51.0	Yes	123	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		38.0	52.0	14.0	51.0	Yes	137	75	On Target
High needs		25.0	45.0	20.0	51.0	Yes	45	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		40.0	45.0	5.0	51.0	No	30	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	21	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	2	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	7	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	5	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		37.0	54.0	17.0	51.0	Yes	123	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	-	60.0	1.00	-
High needs	-	60.0	1.00	-
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	1.00	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	214	213	100	Yes	214	213	100	Yes	73	72	99	Yes
High needs	79	78	99	Yes	79	78	99	Yes	27	26	96	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	51	51	100	Yes	51	51	100	Yes	18	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	2	-	-	-	2	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	41	40	98	Yes	41	40	98	Yes	13	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	11	-	-	-	11	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-	3	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	188	187	99	Yes	188	187	99	Yes	65	64	98	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.