Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Cove Elementary
Districts Schools
Select an Org
View Previous Year
2016
View Next Year
print page

2016 Accountability Data - Cove Elementary
Organization Information
District:Beverly (00300000)School type:Elementary School
School:Cove Elementary (00300015)Grades served:K,01,02,03,04,05
Region:NortheastTitle I status:Title I School (TA)
Accountability and Assistance Level:Level 1
 Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 91.7, Target = 92.8CPI = 91.7, Target = 92.8CPI = 91.7, Target = 92.8 87.6 84.6 91.7 7.1 92.8 93.8 7718975On Target
High needsCPI = 82.6, Target = 84.4CPI = 82.6, Target = 84.4CPI = 82.6, Target = 84.4 73.2 74.4 82.6 8.2 84.4 86.6 807650Improved Below Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 83.3, Target = 76.3CPI = 83.3, Target = 76.3CPI = 83.3, Target = 76.3 74.1 74.1 83.3 9.2 76.3 87.1 8151100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 77.8, Target = 79.7CPI = 77.8, Target = 79.7CPI = 77.8, Target = 79.7 65.2 69.4 77.8 8.4 79.7 82.6 843650Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 92.6, Target = 93.2CPI = 92.6, Target = 93.2 88.4 86.2 92.6 6.4 93.2 94.2 7615575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 90.2, Target = 90.1CPI = 90.2, Target = 90.1 83.0 84.6 90.2 5.6 90.1 91.5 7218975On Target
High needsCPI = 80.9, Target = 81.2CPI = 80.9, Target = 81.2 67.8 75.6 80.9 5.3 81.2 83.9 717675On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedCPI = 81.9, Target = 79.7CPI = 81.9, Target = 79.7CPI = 81.9, Target = 79.7 77.8 77.8 81.9 4.1 79.7 88.9 7451100Above Target
EL and Former EL -------5--
Students w/ disabilitiesCPI = 74.3, Target = 74.4CPI = 74.3, Target = 74.4 56.1 69.9 74.3 4.4 74.4 78.1 763675On Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian -------4--
Afr. Amer./Black -------6--
Hispanic/Latino -------18--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------6--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 91, Target = 90.8CPI = 91, Target = 90.8 84.3 85.2 91.0 5.8 90.8 92.2 6915575On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Baseline CPI 2015 CPI 2016 CPI CPI Change 2016 Target 6 Year Goal CPI Percentile in School Type N PPI Points Rating
All studentsCPI = 79.7, Target = 88.2CPI = 79.7, Target = 88.2CPI = 79.7, Target = 88.2 79.8 70.4 79.7 9.3 88.2 89.9 465850Improved Below Target
High needsCPI = 70.4, Target = 77.8CPI = 70.4, Target = 77.8CPI = 70.4, Target = 77.8 61.9 66.2 70.4 4.2 77.8 81.0 602750Improved Below Target
Econ. Disadvantaged -------18--
EL and Former EL ----------
Students w/ disabilities -------12--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. ----------
Asian ----------
Afr. Amer./Black -------3--
Hispanic/Latino -------9--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. -------3--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. ----------
WhiteCPI = 83.1, Target = 88.3CPI = 83.1, Target = 88.3CPI = 83.1, Target = 88.3 79.9 71.1 83.1 12.0 88.3 90.0 404350Improved Below Target
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 4.9 19.018925 6.3 2.618925
High needs 0.0 5.37625 14.0 6.67625
Econ. Disadvantaged 0.0 7.85125 17.0 7.85125
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 0.0 0.0360 20.0 8.33625
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--18---18-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 5.8 20.015525 4.7 3.215525
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 21.5 38.118925 6.8 4.818925
High needs 8.1 15.87625 14.0 11.87625
Econ. Disadvantaged 9.4 17.65125 11.3 11.8510
EL and Former EL--5---5-
Students w/ disabilities 6.8 8.33625 20.5 19.4360
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--4---4-
Afr. Amer./Black--6---6-
Hispanic/Latino--18---18-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--6---6-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 22.7 41.915525 5.8 3.915525
Summary > 2016
2016 Science Extra Credit
  Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more) Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
2015
% Advanced		 2016
% Advanced		 N PPI Points 2015
% Warning/Failing		 2016
% Warning/Failing		 N PPI Points
All students 3.7 8.65825 12.3 5.25825
High needs 2.9 0.0270 20.6 11.12725
Econ. Disadvantaged--18---18-
EL and Former EL--------
Students w/ disabilities--12---12-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.--------
Asian--------
Afr. Amer./Black--3---3-
Hispanic/Latino--9---9-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.--3---3-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.--------
White 4.2 11.64325 9.9 4.74325
Summary > 2016
2016 English Language Arts Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51 44.0 69.0 25.0 51.0Yes107100Above Target
High needsSGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51SGP = 59, Target = 51 39.5 59.0 19.5 51.0Yes40100Above Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 69.5, Target = 51SGP = 69.5, Target = 51SGP = 69.5, Target = 51 41.0 69.5 28.5 51.0Yes30100Above Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51SGP = 69, Target = 51 44.0 69.0 25.0 51.0Yes88100Above Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Mathematics Growth
  0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2015 SGP 2016 SGP SGP Change 6 Year Goal Met Safe Harbor? N PPI Points Rating
All studentsSGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51SGP = 53, Target = 51 44.0 53.0 9.0 51.0Yes10775On Target
High needsSGP = 43.5, Target = 51SGP = 43.5, Target = 51SGP = 43.5, Target = 51 38.5 43.5 5.0 51.0Yes4075On Target
Econ. DisadvantagedSGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51SGP = 45.5, Target = 51 40.0 45.5 5.5 51.0Yes3075On Target
EL and Former EL --- 51.0----
Students w/ disabilities --- 51.0-14--
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat. --- 51.0----
Asian --- 51.0-2--
Afr. Amer./Black --- 51.0-4--
Hispanic/Latino --- 51.0-8--
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat. --- 51.0-5--
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl. --- 51.0----
WhiteSGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51SGP = 55.5, Target = 51 45.0 55.5 10.5 51.0Yes8875On Target
Summary > 2016
2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth
  2016 SGPA 2016 Target SGPA N Included PPI Points
All students- 60.04-
High needs- 60.04-
EL and Former EL- 60.04-
Summary > 2016
2016 Assessment Participation
  English Language Arts Mathematics Science
Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%) Enrolled Assessed % Met Target (95%)
All students19819498Yes19819498Yes605998Yes
High needs817998Yes817998Yes282796Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged5353100Yes5353100Yes18---
EL and Former EL6---6-------
Students w/ disabilities393795Yes393795Yes13---
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.------------
Asian4---4-------
Afr. Amer./Black6---6---3---
Hispanic/Latino20---20---9---
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.6---6---3---
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.------------
White16215898Yes16215898Yes454498Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

School and District Profiles