Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Centerville Elementary

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Centerville Elementary

Organization Information
District:	Barnstable (00200000)	School type:	Elementary School
School:	Centerville Elementary (00200010)	Grades served:	K,01,02,03
Region:	Southeast	Title I status:	Non-Title I School (NT)
Accountability and Assistance Level:			Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		94.4	91.1	84.1	-7.0	96.7	97.2	34	88	0	Declined
High needs		90.5	84.6	76.6	-8.0	94.5	95.3	61	46	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		84.8	84.8	78.7	-6.1	86.1	92.4	60	34	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		93.9	92.3	84.4	-7.9	96.4	97.0	25	72	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		93.3	91.8	82.4	-9.4	96.1	96.7	16	88	0	Declined
High needs		85.7	87.2	76.1	-11.1	91.7	92.9	29	46	0	Declined
Econ. Disadvantaged		86.6	86.6	77.2	-9.4	87.7	93.3	37	34	0	Declined
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	10	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	18	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		93.9	93.6	84.0	-9.6	96.4	97.0	11	72	0	Declined

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	8.2	10.2	88	25	1.4	5.7	88	0
High needs	5.1	0.0	46	0	2.6	10.9	46	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	7.1	0.0	34	0	3.6	14.7	34	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	9.1	11.1	72	25	1.8	4.2	72	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	30.1	18.2	88	0	4.1	11.4	88	0
High needs	20.5	13.0	46	0	5.1	15.2	46	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	21.4	17.6	34	0	7.1	11.8	34	0
EL and Former EL	-	-	10	-	-	-	10	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	18	-	-	-	18	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	3	-	-	-	3	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	32.7	20.8	72	0	3.6	8.3	72	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
High needs	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
High needs		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
High needs		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	81.0	60.0	31	25
High needs	81.0	60.0	31	25
EL and Former EL	-	60.0	31	-

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	89	89	100	Yes	89	89	100	Yes	-	-	-	-
High needs	47	47	100	Yes	47	47	100	Yes	-	-	-	-
Econ. Disadvantaged	35	35	100	Yes	35	35	100	Yes	-	-	-	-
EL and Former EL	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	19	-	-	-	19	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Asian	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	3	-	-	-	3	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	8	-	-	-	8	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	4	-	-	-	4	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	73	73	100	Yes	73	73	100	Yes	-	-	-	-

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.

Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Centerville Elementary

Centerville Elementary (00200010)

2016 Accountability Data - Centerville Elementary

School and District Profiles