Massachusetts School and District Profiles

Swanson Road Intermediate School

Districts
Schools

2016

2016 Accountability Data - Swanson Road Intermediate School

Organization Information

District:

Auburn (00170000)

School type:

Elementary School

School:

Swanson Road Intermediate School (00170030)

Grades served:

03,04,05

Region:

Central

Title I status:

Title I School (TA)

Accountability and Assistance Level:

Level 1

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		87.6	87.6	90.3	2.7	88.6	93.8	71	543	100	Above Target
High needs		78.5	78.5	82.3	3.8	80.3	89.3	79	162	100	Above Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		79.7	79.7	83.1	3.4	81.4	89.9	79	117	100	Above Target
EL and Former EL		77.9	77.9	82.2	4.3	79.7	89.0	82	38	100	Above Target
Students w/ disabilities		65.5	65.5	65.7	0.2	68.4	82.8	54	43	50	Improved Below Target
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		80.3	80.3	83.3	3.0	81.9	90.2	88	42	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		88.3	88.3	91.3	3.0	89.3	94.2	69	453	100	Above Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		88.0	88.0	89.2	1.2	89.0	94.0	67	544	75	On Target
High needs		78.7	78.7	80.2	1.5	80.5	89.4	69	162	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		82.0	82.0	82.1	0.1	83.5	91.0	75	117	50	Improved Below Target
EL and Former EL		81.6	81.6	84.2	2.6	83.1	90.8	78	38	75	On Target
Students w/ disabilities		63.0	63.0	62.8	-0.2	66.1	81.5	45	43	25	No Change
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	21	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		81.1	81.1	85.1	4.0	82.7	90.6	87	42	100	Above Target
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	17	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		88.7	88.7	90.0	1.3	89.6	94.4	63	454	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Proficiency Gap Narrowing About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	Baseline CPI	2015 CPI	2016 CPI	CPI Change	2016 Target	6 Year Goal	CPI Percentile in School Type	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		84.5	84.5	85.7	1.2	85.8	92.3	66	196	75	On Target
High needs		77.4	77.4	76.0	-1.4	79.3	88.7	76	51	25	No Change
Econ. Disadvantaged		77.9	77.9	76.9	-1.0	79.7	89.0	86	39	25	No Change
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	9	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	11	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	8	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	13	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	4	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White		86.0	86.0	86.7	0.7	87.2	93.0	58	166	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	16.2	20.6	543	25	3.5	4.4	543	0
High needs	9.0	10.5	162	25	9.7	11.1	162	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	13.1	12.8	117	0	10.3	10.3	117	0
EL and Former EL	5.9	7.9	38	25	8.8	7.9	38	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	0.0	43	0	22.0	30.2	43	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Hispanic/Latino	3.0	9.5	42	25	6.1	4.8	42	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	16.3	21.9	453	25	3.4	4.2	453	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	34.4	43.6	544	25	4.2	5.5	544	0
High needs	15.5	24.1	162	25	11.6	12.3	162	0
Econ. Disadvantaged	20.6	26.5	117	25	8.4	9.4	117	0
EL and Former EL	20.6	31.6	38	25	8.8	5.3	38	25
Students w/ disabilities	0.0	7.0	43	25	26.0	37.2	43	0
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	21	-	-	-	21	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Hispanic/Latino	18.2	26.2	42	25	9.1	4.8	42	25
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	17	-	-	-	17	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	35.5	45.2	454	25	3.8	5.3	454	0

Summary > 2016

2016 Science Extra Credit About the Data
	Extra credit for increasing % Advanced (10% or more)				Extra credit for decreasing % Warning/Failing (10% or more)
	2015 % Advanced	2016 % Advanced	N	PPI Points	2015 % Warning/Failing	2016 % Warning/Failing	N	PPI Points
All students	15.0	25.0	196	25	5.9	2.6	196	25
High needs	11.5	9.8	51	0	13.5	9.8	51	25
Econ. Disadvantaged	17.1	12.8	39	0	14.3	10.3	39	25
EL and Former EL	-	-	9	-	-	-	9	-
Students w/ disabilities	-	-	11	-	-	-	11	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-
Asian	-	-	8	-	-	-	8	-
Afr. Amer./Black	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Hispanic/Latino	-	-	13	-	-	-	13	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	-	-	4	-	-	-	4	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	15.5	25.9	166	25	6.2	1.8	166	25

Summary > 2016

2016 English Language Arts Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		45.5	56.0	10.5	51.0	Yes	359	75	On Target
High needs		46.0	50.0	4.0	51.0	Yes	94	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		43.0	48.0	5.0	51.0	Yes	71	75	On Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	23	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	24	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		44.0	58.0	14.0	51.0	Yes	307	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Mathematics Growth About the Data
	0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100	2015 SGP	2016 SGP	SGP Change	6 Year Goal	Met Safe Harbor?	N	PPI Points	Rating
All students		48.0	52.0	4.0	51.0	Yes	362	75	On Target
High needs		48.0	44.5	-3.5	51.0	Yes	94	75	On Target
Econ. Disadvantaged		44.5	47.0	2.5	51.0	No	71	50	Below Target
EL and Former EL		-	-	-	51.0	-	23	-	-
Students w/ disabilities		-	-	-	51.0	-	18	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	1	-	-
Asian		-	-	-	51.0	-	14	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black		-	-	-	51.0	-	3	-	-
Hispanic/Latino		-	-	-	51.0	-	24	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.		-	-	-	51.0	-	10	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.		-	-	-	51.0	-	-	-	-
White		48.0	51.0	3.0	51.0	Yes	310	75	On Target

Summary > 2016

2016 Extra credit for English language proficiency growth About the Data
	2016 SGPA	2016 Target	SGPA N Included	PPI Points
All students	70.0	60.0	25.00	25
High needs	70.0	60.0	25.00	25
EL and Former EL	70.0	60.0	25.00	25

Summary > 2016

2016 Assessment Participation About the Data
	English Language Arts				Mathematics				Science
	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)	Enrolled	Assessed	%	Met Target (95%)
All students	556	554	100	Yes	556	555	100	Yes	202	201	100	Yes
High needs	169	169	100	Yes	169	169	100	Yes	55	55	100	Yes
Econ. Disadvantaged	124	124	100	Yes	124	124	100	Yes	43	43	100	Yes
EL and Former EL	42	42	100	Yes	42	42	100	Yes	11	-	-	-
Students w/ disabilities	44	44	100	Yes	44	44	100	Yes	12	-	-	-
Amer. Ind. or Alaska Nat.	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-	1	-	-	-
Asian	23	-	-	-	23	-	-	-	9	-	-	-
Afr. Amer./Black	10	-	-	-	10	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Hispanic/Latino	44	44	100	Yes	44	44	100	Yes	14	-	-	-
Multi-race, Non-Hisp./Lat.	18	-	-	-	18	-	-	-	4	-	-	-
Nat. Haw. or Pacif. Isl.	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
White	460	459	100	Yes	460	460	100	Yes	170	169	99	Yes

NOTE: In 2016, assessment participation was calculated two ways: First, the 2016 participation rate for each subgroup in each subject area test was calculated. If the actual 2016 participation rate was lower than 95 percent for any group in any subject, that rate was compared to the average of the most recent two years of assessment participation data for that group and subject. The higher of the two resulting rates was factored into the assignment of the school or district's 2016 accountability and assistance level.